A few days ago, the Pingxiang Intermediate People's Court of Jiangxi Province concluded a fraud case at the second instance and sentenced the defendant Rong Mou and six others to fixed-term imprisonment for fraud with prison terms ranging from fourteen years to one year and two months suspended for two years, and fines .
In 2018, the defendants Rong and Wang established Xiaozhima Company to engage in online loans. Rong and Wang organized personnel to commit telecommunications network fraud on the pretext that Xiaozhima Company provided loan intermediary services. Wang provided customers with phone numbers and speaking skills, recruited operators and technicians, and organized the operators into teams for management. The defendant Huang and others were successively hired as technicians to provide online loan platform to customers, and the defendant Tang was appointed as the chief technical teacher. The operator pretended to be the customer service staff of Ant Quick Loan, Sesame Quick Loan and other companies to call customers, fictitious company names and addresses, fictitious loans with no collateral, no guarantees, low interest rates, no credit checks, quick loans, asking borrowers for personal information and making A false screenshot of the loan limit was sent to the borrower, and the borrower was defrauded of 299 yuan or 398 yuan on the grounds that a deposit and cash withdrawal fees were required before the loan. After collecting the above fees, technicians such as Huang Moumou pushed the link to the online loan platform searched online to the borrower, falsely claiming that management was required after the loan was made, and again defrauded the borrower of a handling fee of 10% to 20% of the loan amount. The salesperson transferred the money to Wang after receiving the payment. Due to investigations by the public security organs, Xiaozhima Company ceased operations in May 2019. As of the incident, the criminal group headed by Rong and Wang defrauded more than 17,000 people out of a total of more than 90 million yuan in property.
After trial, the court held that the defendant Rong and other six people fabricated facts, concealed the truth, and used telecommunications networks to defraud others for the purpose of illegal possession. Among them, Rong and Wang defrauded a particularly huge amount, and Tang and four others defrauded others. Huge, all constitute the crime of fraud. After comprehensively considering the criminal facts, circumstances and other factors of the case, the court made the above judgment in accordance with the law.
Source: China Court Network
Author: Liu Hao
Editor: Tian Xuan
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-