text︱ Zhang Youhua
There is a funny king in Taipei's political arena, and he made a lot of jokes because of him again and again. After losing this time, he went to , Chiayi twice to help Li Junqiu choose Chiayi Mayor . The voting time in Chiayi City was December 18, and this burden fell on Chen Chimai, the acting chairman of the Democratic Progressive Party. Li Junqi was born in the "English clan". Chen Chimai hoped that Zheng Yunpeng, Lin Youchang, Chen Shizhong, Lin Jialong and others could go south to assist. When Chen Shizhong was electing at Chiayi, he said that if you support Ah Zhong’s grievances, vote for Li Junqi and let him be elected mayor of Chiayi. He went to Chiayi twice and swept the streets. Recently, he made a comeback in Taipei. When he made a comeback, he talked about three reasons for losing.
The first is because the Soviet Cabinet is promoting the "Digital Intermediary Law" to regulate online platforms, so in the past these Internet celebrities supported the DPP, and now it is because the "Digital Intermediary Law" wants to regulate them, so they do not support the DPP this time, so I will lose the election. The second thing he said is that the failure of the "anti-China and Taiwan card" is not well discussed. The Democratic Progressive Party, including Tsai Ing-wen, regards "anti-China" as a goal, and then "protecting Taiwan" becomes a means, putting the cart before the horse, so there is no way to make a very accurate discussion. In addition, there is a reason for the extension of the service period, which greatly affects the young people's willingness to vote. The third reason is that except for the loss of votes by these young people, DPP supporters did not come out to vote, which made him lose so badly.
In fact, the reasons for the DPP's defeat were very clear, and none of these three were the reasons. These youth votes were not left to KMT . You still lost nearly 3 million votes, that is, the entire Taiwan, DPP lost nearly 3 million votes, but he did not flow to the Kuomintang. Then how could you lose more than 3 million votes? In other words, how did Tsai Ing-wen's "817" come from this point, we can see that they don't review the essence of the real problem . Now Chen Shizhong suddenly becomes a military expert, just talking suddenly. Chen Shizhong talked about the relationship between Taiwan and mainland China. If mainland China wants to "reunify the military", he has three obstacles. The first obstacle is a natural obstacle. Taiwan is not Ukraine. It depends on how mainland China crosses the sea. The second is that the United States sent two aircraft carriers, , to see if mainland China dares to sink these two aircraft carriers. He said that mainland China would definitely not dare. Third, as long as the United States supports it, China will not dare to "reunify the military." This is his three-paragraph.
Chen Shizhong is a dentist. Is he overestimating the issue of "national defense" now? What he said is not true at all. Taiwan Strait is certainly a natural danger, but it is also a sea expressway . The so-called sea expressway means that any strait combat, especially in narrow waters, control of air and sea is the sky and the sea, and the water surface and underwater must be integrated. As long as you can grasp this opportunity, it becomes a free highway. From the past wars, we can all know that the strait is a natural danger on the one hand, and on the other hand, but on the other hand, it also restricts Taiwan's movements. So in this case, what place in the world is a natural danger? As long as you control the advantages of the water surface and underwater battlefield, the ocean is a highway. The second US sent two aircraft carriers. You might as well say that he can send B-1, B-2 and B21 or B52 bombers , because the United States now has the ability to strike outside the defense zone. In fact, as of now, only the United States has the strength in the world, that is, it does not have to enter your defense zone, and it can strike on your coastal targets. The United States sends two aircraft carriers. I once asked my friend, the Indo-Pacific Tsar of the United States, , the Tempo of the United States, and he told me directly, how much does it cost to launch an aircraft carrier a day? He said whether the money is paid by Taiwan or the United States? The sentence
has already represented a lot of meaning.Secondly, whether from Yokosuka or Guam or Hawaii, you have to mobilize two aircraft carriers . At least if he is at sea, it will be about 3 days. If he berths by his home port, I'm sorry, it will take at least one week to reach Taiwan. Therefore, the United States should be in the future. If a war breaks out in the Taiwan Strait, his aircraft carrier will not be able to fight in narrow waters. This is the second one. The third "military unification" even the US senator said by himself. When he passed the " National Defense Authorization Act ", he said that there are probably only three lines of defense for Taiwan. The first is Taiwan to strengthen self-defense, and the second is the United States to make good use of military scheduling, that is, to avoid the so-called sea and air decisive battle. The third is the United States to think about how to impose sanctions. That is to say, these three are compared with the Ukrainian model. The United States has already said so clearly. Chen Shizhong actually said that as long as the United States sends two aircraft carriers, it can stop China's "military unification". This is called lack of knowledge and lack of common sense. Why is it called lack of knowledge and lack of common sense
The reason is very simple, it is exactly the same as what Tempo said. If it is really sent, who will pay the money, which is the focus of the problem. In other words, Chen Shizhong has always believed that the United States will defend Taiwan. Of course, the United States has also expressed this position, but there are many ways to defend. Once China has made up its mind, will the United States' defense be effective? I am asking a question mark?
Copyright Statement: This article is an original article from the author, and the pictures and materials are from the Internet. Illegal reproduction of the text content in this article is strictly prohibited without authorization. If reprinting or citing is required, the author's consent must be obtained and the source must be indicated.
