text | Zhang Youhua
As of now, a series of "paper gate" incidents have erupted in Taiwan's political arena, and two of them are "hottest": One is the "Crown Prince of the East Palace" Zheng Wencan, whose degree has been cancelled. This is before he ran for the Democratic Progressive Party chairman. He already knew that his graduation thesis would be revoked and his master's degree would be cancelled. He also made a face-to-face report to Tsai Ing-wen, but Tsai Ing-wen still tolerated and appointed Zheng Wencan to run for the party chairman. The other is the candidate for the mayor of Keelung , Cai Shiying, whose graduation thesis was removed from the shelves and his doctorate degree was revoked by Taipei University. We can only wait and see whether Cai Shiying should resign from the current "legislator". Before this, under the relentless pursuit of the DPP, the paper of Cai Biru, the favorite general of the People's Party, was also cancelled and his master's degree was recovered. Afterwards, Cai Biru simply announced that he would resign and resign to revenge the people to make grievances.
In Taiwan’s political arena, the DPP has always demanded its opponents with high standards and high morality. For example, before 2020, Kaohsiung mayor candidate Li Meizhen , her paper on Sun Yat-sen University was considered plagiarism. The DPP held on to it and forced Li Meizhen to withdraw from the election or resign from the city council member, and pursued her relentlessly for a month. That time, Li Meizhen's vote rate was only 25%, and she eventually lost to Chen Chimai, which was the worst defeat by the Kuomintang in Kaohsiung.
In the process of the "nine-in-one" election in Taiwan in November 2022, whether it is the Kuomintang Kaohsiung Mayor candidate Ke Zhien, the People's Party Hsinchu City candidate Gao Hongan, the Kuomintang Nantou County candidate Xu Shuhua, and the Kuomintang Taoyuan City candidate Zhang Shanzheng , their papers or research reports were tested one by one, and even the Democratic Progressive Party launched public opinion attacks to force them to withdraw from the election. If judged by the DPP's standards, what does Zheng Wencan, the " East Palace Prince" who is now determined to run for the DPP chairman, have a feeling of what does it mean to the outside world? Let a person with academic loyalty and personality problems serve as the party chairman. As long as the DPP can accept him and is not afraid of losing, the outside world has nothing to say, that is the DPP's housework after all. However, Tsai Shiying is the current "legislator" of Keelung City and the candidate for Keelung mayor who Tsai Ing-wen has appointed. His paper was deemed to be plagiarized and removed from the shelves, and his doctoral degree was revoked. If we follow the consistent standards of the DPP, Tsai Shiying should resign from the "legislator". However, Cai Shiying issued five statements, claiming that he wanted to appeal and repent, but he refused to resign from the "legislator". It’s true that Ko Wen-je angrily retorted that the DPP is a “double-standard party”. Does the People’s Party “legislator” Cai Biru, who wants to deal with it in accordance with the model Tsai Shi adapted? Therefore, we can see the DPP’s shamelessness and shamelessness without a lower limit.
Why does the DPP use high standards to demand others? Use the "paper gate" incident to attack opponents? However, the DPP dares not use its own standards to deal with its own problems. If the DPP is a strong political party and insists on using high morality and high standards, then the DPP's Tsai Shiying must resign from the "legislator", so that there will be an explanation for the majority of voters. The DPP announced this matter after the election, and did not deal with Tsai Shiying like he did when he dealt with Li Meizhen, which made Li Meizhen unable to continue to choose.
From this example, we can see that the DPP's "double standards" behavior has a very bad impact on the political atmosphere in Taiwan's political arena. Since your doctorate’s thesis was removed from the shelves and your doctorate degree was revoked, then should the party ask if he wants to step down? Besides, it’s after the election, not during the election process. During the election process, Gao Hongan had been asking her to withdraw from the election, but Gao Hongan was elected.民进党说柯志恩论文抄袭，柯志恩是拿了40%的选票。 The DPP said that Xu Shuhua's paper had flaws and asked him to retire from the Nantou County Mayor and resign from the "legislator", but Xu Shuhua still chose it. On the contrary, the DPP believes that the paper has no problem with all its own people have been removed from the shelves, and the degree will be revoked, and it will be announced.
Therefore, it is not difficult to see: The problem that Tsai Shi adapted has now become an unexploded bomb within the DPP. Should he quit? How thick should his skin be? Then let the bomb fly for a while.
Copyright Statement: This article is an original article from the author, and the image information is from the Internet. Unauthorized reproduction of the text content in this article is strictly prohibited. If reprinting or citing is required, the author's consent must be obtained and the source must be indicated.
