We all know that when the new crown epidemic just broke out, the unknown pneumonia patients were first discovered in Wuhan, Hubei, my country. In the early stage of the epidemic, many people believed that this virus first appeared in Wuhan, but with the evolution of the epidemic, people gradually discovered that Wuhan is by no means the first place in the world to have a new crown virus.
Because before the outbreak in Wuhan, the United States had "e-cigarette pneumonia" of unknown reasons, and there were quite a few infected people. The earliest time was July 2019, with the largest number of in Wisconsin and Virginia in the United States, with thousands of cases recorded. Moreover, in the fall and winter of 2019, there were also a nationwide outbreak of "influenza" in the United States, with tens of millions of people infected and the deaths were unknown. Since general influenza usually does not undergo virus type testing, it has not been found out whether it is the influenza virus or the new coronavirus.
is not only in the United States, but many other countries in the world discovered that the occurrence of new coronavirus pneumonia was earlier than that of our country. For example, Italy's traceable occurrence time was roughly July and August 2019, and the occurrence of the United Kingdom was almost the same, which shows that our country is not the originator of the new coronavirus at all.
The reason why the new coronavirus appears in my country is that the traceability is related to a batch of frozen American lobster shipped from the United States to my country in November 2019, and another transmission route is believed to be related to the American athletes at the World Military Games held in Wuhan in October that year. The reason why we are the first country in the world to discover the new coronavirus is related to the fact that our country established a rapid and complete infectious disease warning mechanism after the SARS epidemic in 2003, which is a capability that most other countries do not have.
swer 0swer when the US delegation appeared at the 2019 Wuhan Military Games
But some people with ulterior motives always want to splash dirty water on us. Many Western media also followed suit and slandered that they were born in Wuhan without any reason, but fairness is in the hearts of the people. In the face of a large number of facts and evidence, slander and lies are untenable.
In May this year, the chairman of the Lancet's COVID-19 Committee and professor of Columbia University in the United States, Jeffrey Sax , and Neil Harrison, who is also a professor at Columbia University in the United States, published an article in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, hinted that the new coronavirus was made in the laboratory.
Jeffrey Sax
Early, media published articles saying that some scholars discovered that there are more than 30 gene sequences on the new coronavirus, in fact, they were patented by a certain American company a few years ago.
By early July this year, Jeffrey Sachs publicly stated that the source of the new coronavirus was in laboratories in the United States. He made this statement at a meeting held by the think tank GATE Center in Spain, and reiterated that "in my opinion, this is a mistake in biotechnology, not a natural overflow accident."
On September 15, the Lancet magazine published another important report of the COVID-19 Committee. The report is 57 pages long, clearly mentioning that the war between humans and COVID-19 was failed, and also gave the reasons for the failure of humans to deal with the COVID-19 epidemic. It is mainly due to the lack of international cooperation and the poor fight against the epidemic in many countries. It also pointed out that the number of human deaths caused since the outbreak of the COVID-19 epidemic is not the more than 7 million reported by the official report, but believes that the actual death toll exceeds 17 million (including the unreported deaths), which is 10 million more than the total number of official figures in various countries. It also summarized that "this astonishing death toll is both a profound tragedy and a huge global failure on multiple levels."
The above picture shows the overseas epidemic data of the headline anti-epidemic page on September 18, 2022. Statistics show that the global cumulative death toll caused by the epidemic is less than 7 million
Through a detailed analysis of a large amount of evidence and facts, the report concluded that "the fatal pathogen (the new coronavirus) may have leaked from a US laboratory." The article was written by an academic group with more than 40 members. Saxophone is also one of the authors, and the famous virologist Angela Rasmussen is also one of the authors.
The COVID-19 Epidemic Committee is composed of 173 experts from all over the world in medicine, physiology and virology . Before publication, all members read it. Although there are many opponents, the article was published smoothly, indicating that most experts agree with it.
However, after the report was issued, the issue of the origin of the new crown caused an uproar. The key point was that the report said that the origin of the new crown was in a US laboratory. Some so-called experts in the United States said that it could not accept it. Some people said that the publication of the report was a "shameless moment" of the Lancet. Experts with global reputation in the field discussed the facts and concluded through scientific tracing of the origin. Why are they "shameless"? Is it normal to say that the source is other countries, and it is shameless to say that it appears in the United States? What logic? The Spanish flu, which was more than a hundred years ago, is now considered to be the first to appear in the United States. What should I say?
"The Lancet" The report given by the COVID-19 epidemic committee not only explains the source of the COVID-19 outbreak comes from American laboratories, but also gives the initial reasons for the leakage transmission, believing that "the hypothesis about nature and laboratory overflow is working." Natural spillover events in two possible spillover pathways mean that the virus spreads from animals to humans in natural events that are not related to research; while laboratory spillover is the release related to laboratory operations, such as laboratory waste disposal and sewage discharge, or that people and animals are infected during research and brought out of the laboratory.
"The Lancet" is a world-recognized authoritative medical journal. The Lancet COVID-19 Committee has gathered authoritative experts in global medicine and related fields. The report it jointly wrote is of course very authoritative. So should there be an answer to the source of the new coronavirus? Should the debate on the origin be concluded? Although there may still be many people in the world who do not agree with this conclusion, justice is in the hearts of the people!
Reference:
"Observer Network" September 18 article "The Lancet Report: The WHO and most governments are slow to deal with the new coronavirus, and millions of deaths can be avoided"
"China News Network" July 2 article "Foreign media: Lancet scholars say that the new coronavirus may originate from the American biological laboratory"
