Taiwan’s “nine-in-one” county and city elections reached the end. Taipei mayor’s first TV debate was decided on November 5. The blue, green and white camps will meet for the third time next week to confirm the final debate format. Huang Shanshan, a non-party candidate for Taipei mayor, is full of confidence in the debate and often says that she has been preparing for more than 20 years. According to Taiwanese media reports, Huang Shanshan often writes articles to criticize Taipei City Ke Wenzhe and Wu Kunyu, who was once the "literary courage" of the People First Party Chairman Song Chuyu, participated in the "defense".
It is understood that Huang Shanshan's camp has started to discuss and debate details in mid-October. In addition to some experts and scholars, recently, Wu Kunyu, chairman of the People First Party, was also invited to formerly "literary courage" and often wrote editorials to criticize Ko Wenzhe. In fact, Wu Kunyu and Huang Shanshan have personal relationships. When Huang Shanshan resigned in 2019, when he resigned from the People's First Party Director of the Cultural and Propaganda Department, Wu Kunyu also resigned from the Deputy Director of the Cultural and Propaganda Department. The two had a close personal relationship. When the staff suggested that Wu Kunyu be the "comparison group", the other party also expressed his willingness to assist.
People who are close to Huang analyzed that Huang Shanshan’s strength is municipal familiarity. When the date reaches November 5, Huang Shanshan will hold 10 political press conferences. His political outline is quite complete, and urban planning has always been Huang Shanshan’s main strength.
people recently mentioned that Huang Shanshan's weakness is that she has no sparks on political issues. In several links of the debate, including telling the public's vision and concepts during the essay, it needs to be strengthened more, so that the public can know the quality of the issue in a short time and clearly explain the political views and content to the public.
people in recent years pointed out that cross-questioning focuses on blocks for the staff, including how to throw issues to opponents and how to deal with opponents. For example, questions such as the Big Dome, Shezidao , internal medicine transportation, etc. may be asked, and it may be difficult to prevent them at that time. (Lin Jingxian/editor)
