All along, the editor thinks that the Invincible Destruction King in 2012 is a nearly perfect work created by Disney. It cleverly combines the characters and animations of the red and white machine game in our childhood. Recently, the sequel to this work, "Invincible Destruction King 2: The Internet" has finally been released nationwide to meet everyone. Today, the editor will analyze this movie for you.
This video has no storyline connection with the first one. For the steering wheel of Sugar Rush, the two protagonists entered the Internet. After ebay placed an order, they found that they actually needed to pay. In desperation, they had to make money through various means. After making enough money, Yun Ni awakened the risky genes in her body and did not want to return to the boring life in the game hall. In order to win back friends, Ralph has some extreme choices to destroy other people's games, which eventually lead to paralysis of the entire network. Finally, the virus was affected (yes, it was affected), and everything was back together. Yunni stayed in the racing game on the Internet. Ralph returned to the game hall and chatted with videos every day. Although she was not around, her relationship was as always.
First of all, let’s talk about the standard of a good movie in my mind. The editor believes that a good movie lies in telling a good story. Of course, as a comprehensive art, a story is not the only factor, but being able to tell a good story is the most important thing, followed by other modifications and beautifications.
This work still strictly follows the narrative line according to the Hollywood standard routine model. Every plot is a breakthrough and is linked together. Yunni was naughty while running karts and broke the steering wheel of the game console. So she went to the Internet world to buy a new replacement, otherwise the game console boss would treat him as scrap. There seems to be no problem with such a narrative line, but the failure of this work is also here.
There are a large number of Internet company logos in the video. The editor has seen Tmall, Weibo, JD.com, Tencent, and even Maoyan... Is this animated movie or an advertising movie? This work is simply an animated film born for Easter eggs and advertisements. I have to sigh that having copyright means you can do whatever you want, making this film a large-scale show of wealth at Disney.
Let us review the works of the same type. " Zootopia " also has various easter egg details advertisements, but if you remove these easter egg advertisements, it is still an excellent animated movie. I still remember when the movie was first released, many people were still discussing what the CP of the fox and rabbit can give birth. For Ralph and Yunni, who are unstoppable, the long-term friendship confession in the movie makes people feel that it is not new, and the two can even rely on their mouths to kill the villain...
still remember the touching and stunning when watching the first part, the conflicts between the characters, and the foreshadowing of the plot make the editor look forward to the subsequent plot. The second part always feels like a dime. Apart from the advertisements and easter eggs, there is no impressive point at all. does not mean that the issues it discusses are not profound, nor does it mean that it is a misunderstanding, but that all of these have not served a unified theme well, nor has they formed a unified attitude.
Overall, while this sequel presents joy to us, the plot is slightly weak, the narrative is relatively dull, the contradictions and conflicts are not enough, and there is a lack of a villain who can promote the plot or a grand scene. , especially in the last paragraph, the editor hopes that Disney can play some roles to these characters, such as Iron Man, the Star Wars soldier, and a princess with magical powers, who can all contribute to the fight against the villain, which may be more exciting.
