Recently, netizens have been quarreling, is it "Therefore, the heaven will give great responsibilities to the 'this' man" or "Therefore, the heaven will give great responsibilities to the 'this' man"? Even this topic has become a hot search. It seems that the question of "is a person" or "a person" is not a small number of people, but the vast majority of people are in chaos.
Writer first talk about his own opinions, or my own experience on this issue.
At the beginning, I almost undoubtedly said it was "this person" and said firmly that this is how I read it when I was studying! When saying this, Yizhi was very firm and unquestionable. Whoever doubted me would definitely be confused. But later, the writer himself became confused.
Because after reading several versions of Chinese textbooks, including the Siku Quanshu engraved book "Mencius Collection Notes", the Hiren written in it is "a man". If there is a probability of mistaken printing in Chinese textbooks, there may be an ancient book, but the original author of Mencius 2 also wrote "a man", then there is no mistake.
On October 26, a staff member of the Chinese editorial department of the People's Education Press Middle School said that since the middle school textbooks published by People's Education Press included the article "Born in distress, die in peace" in 1961, the textbooks that have been collected in succession have been "human" versions. They have also read many ancient books, and the result of the search is also "Heaven will give great responsibilities to man."
After seeing this truth, the writer-in-law was in a bad mood at that time and was a little broken. Is it really because my memory is confused? I remember when I was studying, I was clearly reading “this person”, but why did I suddenly become “this person”?
In fact, among the groups that firmly believe that they are "this person", most of them are born in the 1970s and 1980s, while those born in the 1990s and 2000s basically think that they are "humans". This is a relatively interesting phenomenon. Why do the four generations of people have two clearly divided memories?
This matter looks quite mysterious, so some people say that this is Mandela effect .
Mandela effect is a psychological word, which is related to former South African president Mandela . In 2013, Nelson Mandela passed away. However, as soon as the news of Mandela's death came out, netizens began to wonder, isn't he already dead? Didn’t he die in 1980 when he was imprisoned? Some people even said with confidence that he had seen news about Mandela's funeral at that time, saw the deep condolences of Mandela's family on TV, etc.
At this time, the problem arose. Mandela was not dead yet. Why do people collectively think that he had died long ago, and even there is a scene of him holding a funeral in their minds?
At that time, due to the collective misrememberment of many netizens, the idea that time and space might have been confused. Later, this phenomenon was named "Mandela Effect" by Fiona Broome, a researcher of paranormal phenomenon, which means that it has a wrong impression of things, which may lead to the public's collective memory of history inconsistent with historical facts.
Let’s go back to the issue of “is a person” or “a person”. If it is a memory error of someone else, it may be just a personal problem. Now there is a collective debate about “a person” or “a person”. This matter is quite intriguing. So is this incident considered a Mandela effect?
writer believes that objectively speaking, it should be considered the Mandela effect. If it can be regarded as the Mandela effect, then a new problem arises again. Why does this effect occur?
can actually be explained by an idiom, that is, "transmitting rumors through rumors".
is essentially the same as when the news of Mandela's death was announced. The reason for this misunderstanding is that we see fake news, or that it is easier for us to believe what others say.
When chatting in life, we often keep the individual content of chatting with someone in mind, but in fact the information conveyed to you by that person is also wrong. However, under the rumors, many people think it is true, so collective errors occur, especially in today's relatively developed Internet and in the era of self-media, the emergence of wrong information may cause a large number of people to have collective errors in their understanding.
The problem of "is a person" or "a person" may not be simply attributed to the Internet or self-media. Writer believes that TV series, screenwriters, and writers also make an indelible contribution.
In many TV series, ancient Chinese texts come out at once, but some are obviously wrong. Of course, for this kind of mistake, some are deliberately made mistakes or modified ancient Chinese texts by screenwriters or writers, in order to be more appropriate to the collaborative works, while others are ignorant.
For example, "Ask the world, what love is, it makes people agree to life and death." Many people will think that this sentence is correct because it is too deeply rooted in people's hearts, but in fact it is wrong. The correct one should be: ask the world, what love is, it teaches life and death to agree to life and death. What’s scary is that if you read too many wrong sentences and read them smoothly, you will feel a little awkward when you read the correct original text. Many people even think that “directly teaching people to live and die together” is wrong, and the correct one should be “directly teaching people to live and die together”. Why does this happen to
? Because the works of Jin Yong and Qiong Yao are so deeply rooted in people's hearts, this is not because they make mistakes unconsciously, but because they make mistakes consciously. Perhaps the author was just thinking about it at that time, but he didn't think about it so much about the others.
There is also "The mountains have no edges, and the heaven and earth are in harmony, so I dare to be separated from you", which is easy to understand and catchy. This is also a method used by Qiong Yao to transform ancient poems for himself. The original sentence should be, "The mountains have no tombs, and the rivers are exhausted, and Winter thunder and tremors, and the summer rain and snow, and the heaven and earth are in harmony, so I dare to be separated from you!"
It should be noted that Qiong Yao not only simplified the original poem, but "The mountains have no tombs" have been changed to "The mountains have no edges". If you don't pay attention, you may not find the changes next to you. If you are not careful, you will be confused. In fact, the difference between words and the meaning of the original sentence will also change. The original sentence means "the mountains are razed to the ground", and when you arrive at Qiong Yao, the meaning becomes "the mountains have no edges".
and the popular drama "The Most Taste of the World is Qingyou", which will make many people think it is the original sentence of poetry. In fact, the original sentence of Su Shi is "The taste of the world is Qingyou", which means: what is really delicious is the light joy. Or it expresses an attitude towards life, and being plain is the truth.
This is how the confusion between "this person" and "is human". Of course, such things have always existed, not just "this person" and "being a person". For example, many erroneous words are now considered to be and erroneous . In fact, it becomes true when it is wrong, and it has even been absorbed by modern Chinese dictionaries. For example, the word "tattoo" is used now, and the meaning is the same and the pronunciation is similar. The same is true for "s" and "yes". The expressions are the same, both of which are "this" or "this".
In addition, there is a very interesting phenomenon between the two words "S" and "Yes". You might as well share it with you. The word "S" is full of ancient meaning at first glance, but "Yes" is too common, too ordinary, and is a character that is only used in modern languages. However, "S" is not very common in modern languages, so we can draw this conclusion that the word "S" is more suitable for ancient languages. Some people may think that the person who is about to give great tasks must be "this person".
