There is always someone in the following picture to prove that the employee has not paid the fees, so is it reasonable for the employee’s pension to be unreasonable?
I think this understanding is wrong. You can go to the Social Security Bureau to ask, your picture proves that from the 51st year of liberation to the implementation of social security payments, the company paid the labor insurance blond retirement wages to employees in the past 40 years. Moreover, at that time, wage payments were relatively low, and enterprises only paid 3% of the total wages that the enterprise should pay, and the enterprise would pay the retirement wages after employees retired. The following figure shows the legal provisions for paying fees and receiving retirement wages at the time of " Labor Insurance Regulations of the People's Republic of China". At that time, the labor insurance fund had only a collective unified account for employees, and employees did not pay fees, so they did not have a personal account.
In fact, since the 51st year of liberation, the state has required enterprises to pay labor insurance pension wages (pension subsidy) to employees in accordance with the Labor Insurance Regulations of the People's Republic of China.
After the social security reform, the state requires that pension insurance payment be implemented in accordance with the two parts of the payment of enterprises and individuals. In the past, labor insurance payment only had the overall payment part of the enterprise, and without the personal payment of employees, there would be no personal account part. This is a big difference between the two pensions calculated based on the deemed payment period and the pensions that are not fair for the previous period of pensions. If you only calculate the pensions based on the amount of payment, it is completely unfair. The results of the two pensions that pay the labor insurance premium and the pensions that pay the social insurance premium are very different. It is unfair for the pensions for old workers who have the deemed payment period. The state has formulated a policy to calculate pensions based on the payment period, not only to consider the amount of payment. More importantly, the payment period must be viewed fairly, which is the objective reason for the implementation of the payment period policy.
is aimed at employees who used to pay only the company's payment part, but not the personal payment part. The state bears the personal payment part, which is why Article 13 of the Social Security Law stipulates that the individual payments deemed to be paid by the state during the payment period.
After the implementation of social security payment, the labor insurance fund part of the enterprise paid was actually handed over to the Social Security Bureau's unified account to pay employee pensions. Therefore, the current pension calculation for the period of deemed payment should not only be calculated based on the actual period of payment, but also the transitional pension for the period of deemed payment should be added to the employees according to the part of the personal account that the state bears.
These legal provisions and historical facts fully prove that the enterprise pays the labor insurance premium retirement wage for employees in accordance with national laws, which is reasonable and more legal. If the rural people's commune also paid the retirement wage for members for more than 15 years, and the labor insurance payments were transferred to the Social Security Bureau after the social security payments. Of course, farmers can receive pensions like employees based on the deemed payment period.
To sum up, based on that picture and Article 13 of Social Security denied that employees have paid their fees and received their pensions for nearly 40 years. They thought that by saying "The individual payments are borne by the state during the period of payment", it can be said that employees did not pay the fees, and the pensions are free and they are eaten for nothing, which is completely unreasonable and will not be recognized by the National Social Security Law. I thought that if I smeared the workers' pensions, I could (including the people's commune and individuals) not paying the fees, and I would receive the same amount of pensions as deemed to be paid for the years of payment, which is unreasonable and even more illegal.
