Musk talked about Taiwan in an interview with the Financial Times, and put forward his very systematic view and appeal. He responded positively to this point, and how do you think about this matter?
Mr. Musk, the founder of Tesla , was interviewed by the Financial Times on October 8. He accepted a few things about what you think about Taiwan.
First, he said that the current situation in the Taiwan Strait is too tense and too dangerous. Once a conflict occurs, it may cause about 30% of the global economic output to be lost, which is called risk; second, he suggested that Taiwan become a reasonable and feasible special administrative region of China, similar to Hong Kong but different from Hong Kong.
And Mr. Musk also said, "Although I proposed this plan, everyone will not be satisfied, and everyone may feel that it is not satisfied, it doesn't matter. As long as you can achieve peace in this way, you can finally coordinate with each other through an agreement. The final result of coordination will make Taiwan achieve a more relaxed condition than Hong Kong. " One Country, Two Systems " has different plans, and the Hong Kong plan, and the Macau plan will of course have Taiwan plans in the future.
The next day, early morning on the 9th, our ambassador of the People's Republic of China to the United States tweets . The first one said that he thanked Mr. Musk for his appeal for the peace situation across the Taiwan Strait, and especially like Mr. Musk mentioned some suggestions from very specific special administrative regions, he believed that these ideas were valuable. Moreover, Mr. Qin Gang said that this is a basic policy of our Chinese government, "peaceful reunification" and "one country, two systems" and this is also the best way for China to move towards national reunification. In particular, Mr. Musk's opinions were sublimated a little and made a high evaluation.
Second, he said that as long as the sovereignty and security of the whole of China and the development interests of development, the unified Taiwan will become a highly autonomous, which is the so-called reasonable and feasible special administrative region, and enjoy a very wide development space, and talk about the future of Taiwan.
Third, the rights, interests and rights of these residents in Taiwan will be fully protected. This is the consistent policy of the Chinese government, and the direction of future efforts will be the same. This will not only help our brothers on both sides of the Taiwan Strait to enjoy such interests and glory of the national rejuvenation of , but also help the peaceful development of the entire Asia-Pacific region and the entire world. This is a positive response made by Mr. Qin Gang.
Mr. Musk is not studying international relations, nor is he studying the Taiwan issue, but why does he pay so much attention to the Taiwan issue? Publicly and high-profile publication of such a possibility will cause some people to be unhappy. I think it first shows that countries around the world, especially social elites from all walks of life, hope that the entire world will move towards a future of peaceful development, people are paying attention to Sino-US relations, especially the Taiwan issue, and even to a certain extent, they pay attention to the prospects of the Taiwan issue. Such a focus is more important than Ukraine, because the Taiwan issue may involve China and the United States. Whether to develop cooperation in peace and develop cooperation or move towards conflict and war in the future is a crucial and important issue for all mankind.
Second, when everyone in the whole world is paying attention to the Taiwan issue, there are more friends like Mr. Musk who insist on a pragmatic attitude, more friends who insist on the demands of peace, and more friends who are kind-hearted.
Third, for all such friends, who are more realistic and pragmatic, no matter what their political stance is, no matter what their values are, no matter which country, what national interests are, or what personal character they are from, as long as they seek truth from facts, from the perspective of peaceful development and goodwill, the conclusions they have made are generally highly similar to the basic policy of "peaceful reunification" and "one country, two systems" of the Chinese government, as well as the basic ways for cross-strait relations to move from peaceful development to peaceful reunification.
The difference is that some specific methods and means are slightly different, or some, such as the prospects after unification, everyone's assessments are slightly different. This is all without problems and can be gradually adjusted. This further explains that for the world, for all peaceful mankind, especially the elites among our peaceful mankind, "one China" is a consensus and a basic fact recognized by everyone. It is not only our common understanding, but also a basic fact, and a basic principle of the international community.
also shows that everyone has realized that if the "one China" principle is negated, if we deviate from it, or even destroy it, the harm caused and the negative impact we suffer together will be unbearable to us. The basic principle of
cannot be changed by anyone. It is impossible for anyone to change it if they say a few strange words. And it is not to say that a few people can change it by using conspiracies or sow discord, provoking, or even creating some conflicts and frictions of force. They must also respect this basic fact.
