A few days ago, Russian President Putin clearly stated in an interview with reporters that mainland China can achieve cross-strait reunification without force and rely solely on economic strength. This remark quickly caused heated discussion on Taiwan's island, and Su Zhenchang, as the head of a Taiwan administrative agency, publicly expressed his objections.
In Su Zhenchang's view, Putin's remarks have two questions: first, he believes that Putin confuses the concept that armed conflict is only a kind of war. If mainland China uses economic means to achieve political goals, it can be classified as the category of "war"; second, Su Zhenchang believes that Putin's statement has obvious tendencies without understanding the facts between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait. For a long time, the relationship between mainland China and Russia has been very good, and the two countries have "very close personal relationship". From this perspective, when Putin answers such questions, he will definitely help mainland China. The implication is that Putin's view is not convincing enough.
From Su Zhenchang's rebuttal, we can clearly feel the paleness of his language, especially the first point of view, which is completely playing the "word game". Indeed, in the scope of war, there is economic war . But Putin's words and what Su Zhenchang understood were incompatible with the meaning. According to Putin's view, as one of the best economies in the world, mainland China will continue to improve its economic strength, and will allow Taiwan to actively approach and cooperate with the mainland to achieve cross-strait unification. Su Zhenchang means that mainland China will implement economic means, such as the previously hyped "poor Taiwan strategy" and economic blockade.
As for the second point mentioned by Su Zhenchang, it is used to describe it as a common saying, which is "talking lies with open eyes". Take 2021 as an example. The DPP authorities not only call on the international community to support its participation in the UN , UN , but also sell the "two-state theory" in various public occasions, striving to win the mercy and support of some countries with unknown circumstances. But the fact is that there are very few people who speak for the DPP authorities. On the contrary, there are fewer and fewer so-called "diplomatic countries" in Taiwan. This shows that everyone knows what kind of role Taiwan is now. Su Zhenchang accused Putin of not understanding the facts and speaking with tendencies. So why didn’t Su Zhenchang refute the US government’s public commitment to support the one-China principle?
Moreover, after expressing his opposition, Su Zhenchang responded to the issue of "the probability of war between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait". In his statement, he did not answer the question positively, but emphasized that in order to prevent the war from happening, the Taiwan authorities have worked hard to prepare for war and to "stop war with war." In addition, Su Zhenchang also proposed that the Taiwan authorities will not provoke mainland China and try to use this to illustrate the Taiwan authorities' concept of "seeking peace."
Su Zhenchang's statement can be said to have elevated the Taiwan authorities to a moral commanding heights. While raising itself, it also smeared mainland China. This behavior of pushing responsibility to mainland China can be regarded as a model of "both responsibility and establishment".
Everyone on earth knows that since ancient times, Taiwan has been an inalienable part of China's territory. However, since the DPP came to power, it has worked hard to create a tense confrontation between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait for its own selfish interests, and accelerated the public opinion propaganda of "de-Sinicization" from all aspects.
Not only that, the DPP authorities also smear mainland China in the international community, advocate the threat theory of mainland China, and sell the "two-state theory". When we see that using international public opinion cannot achieve the goal of "Taiwan independence", we put our hopes on the United States, trying to use the support of the United States to achieve the goal of "resisting unification with force". In order to gain support from the United States, the Taiwan authorities are willing to sell their local interests. Behind the name "improving military strength" is the Taiwan authorities who use white money to help the United States clear the "inventory" of weapons. In addition, as one of the world's top semiconductor manufacturing companies, TSMC has also become a victim of the Taiwan authorities' "paying tribute" to the United States.
I thought that in this way, the United States could support itself "wholeheartedly". What the Taiwan authorities did not expect was that at this time point, China and the United States held a new round of high-level meetings and sent positive signals to the outside world.
In view of this, the retired lieutenant general on the island pointed out incisively that for the United States, Taiwan is just a cheap pawn that restrains mainland China. What kind of situation is most beneficial to the United States? It means "not only" and "unconstrained", so that the United States can gain political benefits while gaining economic benefits through arms sales to Taiwan. Once the Taiwan authorities are disobedient and seek "independence", mainland China has no choice but to "attack Taiwan by force", the United States will throw away the pawn and find the next "agent".
Finally, we want to emphasize that the DPP authorities Tsai Ing-wen and others have done their best to forget their ancestors. Such behavior will not be allowed in any country. The DPP authorities are delusional in seeking "Taiwan independence". If they do not want to make mainland China "famous in their masters", they should not do things that will be despised by compatriots on both sides of the Taiwan Strait.
