In early April, hundreds of civilian bodies were found in the northern town of Kiev, Ukraine. Ukraine accused the Russian army of killing these civilians, while Russia refuted that this was a smear against the Russian army by the Kiev regime. Although the truth of the relevant incident is still unknown, whether the real murderer of the tragedy is the Russian army or the Ukrainian neo-Nazi remains to be investigated, but Western countries blame all the blame on the Russian army without any independent investigation by any third party, and used this as an excuse to impose a series of sanctions on Russia and forced the UN Human Rights Council to suspend the qualifications of Russia's member states. This incident directly led to the stagnation of the Russian-Ukrainian peace negotiations, which had already made preliminary progress, and had serious consequences. On May 13, the United Nations Human Rights Council once again proposed a relevant proposal on the "Bucha Incident", which once again caused heated discussions on the "Bucha Incident", which had been silent for nearly a month.
According to TASS , the UN Human Rights Council proposed a proposal on May 13 that required Human Rights Council to organize an investigation team to investigate Russia, fully investigate the "human rights violations committed by Russia in the town of Boucha and other parts of Ukraine, and punish relevant personnel. This proposal has an obvious preset position and presumption of guilt . Without clear evidence, it is determined that Russia is the murderer of the "Bucha Incident" and uses this as the guiding ideology to find "evidence". This is a typical "shooting arrows first and then drawing the target". It is impossible for an investigation team established under the premise of a clear preset position to find out the truth of the incident. China and Eritrea believed that the resolution was "deficient in objectivity", so they voted against it, while twelve countries including Kazakhstan and Armenia voted abstentions. However, the United States and Britain gathered thirty-three countries to vote for it, and finally let the obviously unreasonable resolution pass.
Russia had expected the current situation. As early as May 10, the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs made it clear that it would not send representatives to attend all meetings held by the Human Rights Council related to the Ukrainian issue. On May 12, Gennady Gatilov, permanent representative of the Russian Federation to United Nations , pointed out that the current goal of the Human Rights Council is not to investigate the truth clearly, but to help the West demonize Russia. Ukrainian extremists and neo-Nazis have been ignored by the Western world over the past years in human rights violations against their citizens, especially Russians. The obviously unreasonable resolution such as
will cause great damage to the authority of the United Nations mechanism. An investigation team established under the presumption of guilt and preset position is obviously impossible to investigate the truth of the incident. The investigation results will only become an excuse for the West to slander and attack Russia and launch a new round of sanctions against Russia. This has actually made the United Nations mechanism a soundtrack for the West and a tool for the United States and the West to beautify its hegemonic behavior. And although thirty-three countries followed the United States and voted in favor, it is questionable whether there is a phenomenon of coercive diplomacy behind this.
In early April, the UN Human Rights Council announced a suspension of Russia's membership, and Serbia voted in favor of the proposal. Just when the world was shocked, Serbian President Vucic explained that EU threatened Serbia. If the United States and the West voted in favor, it would impose sanctions on Serbian oil companies. How many countries that voted in favor this time really recognized this proposal, and how many countries had to do it under the coercion of the United States and the West? In short, the impact of this resolution adopted by the UN Human Rights Council was extremely bad. It not only did not help to find out the truth, but also seriously damaged the authority of the United Nations and also encouraged the unhealthy trend of Western hegemony in coercive diplomacy.
Since the "Bucha Incident", the Human Rights Council has held many meetings in succession, and a large number of human rights organizations have also condemned Russia in the absence of substantive evidence. But looking back on the past few decades, the US military sprayed chemical weapons in Vietnam, which not only poisoned countless Vietnamese military and civilians, but also caused the rapid increase in infant deformity in many places, and the impact has not been eliminated so far; NATO launched a large-scale air strike on Yugoslavia , causing the death of countless civilians; Afghanistan , the US military accidentally killed or deliberately killed tens of thousands of Afghan civilians in 20 years; Iraq , some US soldiers enjoyed the abuse of captured Iraqi soldiers... It can be said that the human rights crimes committed by the United States are numerous, and each one has a mountain of ironclad evidence, but where were these hypocritical human rights organizations at that time? Where are these politicians who are rushing to call for civilians who are killed and injured in Ukraine? Where are these national governments who are yelling to sanction Russia? It can be seen from this that human rights issues have become a tool for the Western camp to fight against differences. Only by adhering to the true multilateralism can the international human rights cause develop healthily.
returned to the battlefield of Russia and Ukraine. With the so-called "Bucha Incident", Ukraine and the black hands behind it have recently received an unprecedentedly favorable diplomatic environment, and almost all Western countries have expressed public support for Ukraine. However, behind a seemingly smooth situation, there is a huge hidden danger, that is, there is no direct evidence to point out that the Russian army is the initiator of the "Bucha Incident", and there is no direct video or image evidence to prove that the Russian army killed more than 400 civilians. Russia has repeatedly stated that the Russian army has never killed local civilians, and the so-called "Bucha incident" was forged by the Kiev authorities in order to provoke Russia. Some of the "evidence" presented by Ukraine are also full of loopholes, such as some "corpses" are constantly moving, and the Russian side pointed out that this was a photograph by the actor.
, and from the perspective of decisive victory on the battlefield, Ukraine currently continues to support the international public opinion field, thereby obtaining more substantive assistance. But judging from the incident itself, although Ukraine has always insisted that it was the Russian army that caused the tragedy, it has never produced credible evidence. So far, there are no pictures or videos that prove that the civilians died were killed by the Russian army. On the contrary, the evidence submitted by Ukraine is full of loopholes, whether it is moving "corpses" or the streets that are still very clean on April 2 and are covered with civilian corpses on April 3. It is really difficult for these loopholes to convince people of the Ukrainian government's rhetoric. Moreover, the Ukrainian government forces and neo-Nazis armed forces have killed countless civilians in the Donbas area in the past eight years, and have a "crime of killing civilians".
. In response to the "Bucha incident", China's resolute vote against it has actually explained many problems! Previously, China's Permanent Representative to the United Nations Zhang Jun pointed out that the international community should remain rational rather than doing such things that fuel the fire and intensify contradictions. In the view of the Aerospace Lord, no one wants to see the death and injury of innocent civilians in the war; no matter which side takes violent activities against civilians, it will never be tolerated. But because of this, we need to conduct a detailed and objective investigation of these violent activities against civilians to ensure that good people are not wrongly accused and bad people are not let go. The Bucha incident at this stage is in the " Rashomon " period with full of doubts and fog. The rash accusations against Russia will only make the situation more complicated! At present, the most urgent task is to give full play to the role of the United Nations and organize various neutral countries to establish a joint investigation team to conduct an objective, impartial and comprehensive investigation into this tragedy, which is enough to comfort the deceased. If hegemonic countries are allowed to make trouble, perhaps the truth may become further and further away from us as time goes by!
