(This article is original by Sir movie: dushetv)
When everyone is making the same sound, you should be especially alert.
Sir is increasingly agreeing with this sentence.
A few days ago, Xu Zhiyuan and his " Thirteen Invitation " were pushed to the opposite of popular culture because of the two episodes of Ma Dong and Yu Feihong.
Does Xu Zhiyuan have an elite consciousness? There is no doubt.
Does Xu Zhiyuan look vulgar? It depends on one's opinion.
But in terms of the value of the interview program, Xu Zhiyuan and his "Thirteen Invitations" are far higher than the general level in China.
In Sir's view, "Thirteen Invitations" is precisely one of the few "real" programs in China. What is reality? Reality means "confusion". It must not be the exquisiteness and perfection under the implementation of a certain will. It may be embarrassing, confused, or even wrong.
For example, when Xu Zhiyuan talks about Ma Dong, we are all impressed by the former's "impatient" and the latter's "leisure and contentment", and think that the two of them can't talk together.
Is it really a waste of your time?
Then Sir asked, how many programs can "force" Ma Dong to say "My background is sad."
isn't this more meaningful than those routine interviews that are eloquent and answered in a sensible way?
Xu Zhiyuan talked about Yu Feihong's issue. I wonder how many people who forwarded the explosive article have actually read it. In fact, most of the attitude Yu Feihong showed is more bored than enjoying it.
Yu Feihong also said this -
Really
In fact, life itself is a meaningless thing
When you raise the stone in your hand and throw it out, you should read his work in full (expression).
Today's author @小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小小�
She watched all the interview programs of "Thirteen Invitations" and she also didn't say anything but couldn't speak up -
It's not a sin to create embarrassment.
is the same as Xu Zhiyuan, which may be an inappropriate voice.
But we still need to listen.
said proudly that Sir is quite proud of readers who have such countercurrents.
article | Mi Shisi
Sir movie exclusive article. Reprinting without permission is not allowed
Xu Zhiyuan was ridiculed by the group again.
White shirt, jeans, slippers or board shoes, an untreated hair, a blackhead, acne-bearded face, completely satisfying the public's imagination of an old literary youth, and has become the hottest topic this month.
Xu Zhiyuan talks about Yu Feihong's episode, as the control group of "beauty and wild beasts", concentrated the maximum firepower.
Maybe because Yu Feihong is so beautiful, even as a woman, I still can’t help but admire her frequently.
found that in this episode, no matter which moment you choose to pause, no matter whether Yu Feihong is smiling, laughing, talking, turning his head or dazed, her beauty is flawless, and the principle of "frozen face effect" has completely failed in the face of her all-round beauty.
Xu Zhiyuan's always embarrassment was magnified by a thousand times in front of Yu Feihong.
But this embarrassment is by no means the embarrassment and greasiness that some public accounts deliberately piece together many incoherent screenshots of time points, but highlighted.
In a beautiful woman, love itself is a beautiful enough topic.
Xu Zhiyuan always said abruptly during the interview: You are really beautiful.
You are really good-looking... It's really good-looking
Is this awkward?
This state made me laugh, thinking of the group of male classmates who were very unsatisfied when they were in love in middle school.
Xu Zhiyuan actually asked very restrainedly.
He said: What expands certain boundaries of your life?
Bingxue's smart Yu Feihong obviously understood the implication: Many people may think it is love, but it is actually the whole experience.
Experience is to go to life.
She denied the absolute factor of love for her growth, and Xu Zhiyuan was a little surprised and asked:
"Is there really no such love?"
Yu Feihong denied it again.
Xu Zhiyuan's incompatible relationship is here.
He always chooses to keep asking questions when he can't get the answer he wants.
For example, he thought that love must be very important to Yu Feihong.
However, to be fair, Xu Zhiyuan's state is not only true when facing his goddess. Whether it is Luo Pang in the first episode of the conversation or Ma Dong in the latest episode, including the middle Yao Chen and Feng Xiaogang, everyone -
He sat opposite anyone and had such "embarrassing chat" moments.
How hideous I am
This cannot be said to be
Just like Xu Zai faced Ma Dong, he also asked countless times: "Do you really think that watching " Talk of Strange " is the same as watching " Talk of Strange " and "Takes of Strange " are the same?"
Ma Dong is a thorough cultural equality theorist (at least from the perspective of performance) - he believes that after the years of precipitation, Shakespeare and "Takes of Strange tide" are essentially similar, and Andy Lau and Jay Chou and Anita Mui and Cheng Yanqiu are also roughly similar.
Xu Zhiyuan still constantly expressed his attitude in the form of inquiry: "Do you really think that there is no difference between our era and all previous eras?"
And what Ma Dong answered him was a sure "yes".
Xu Zhiyuan continued to ask Ma Dong: "How did you do it (this way)?"
Ma Dong said: "I'm not that narcissistic."
Xu Zhiyuan laughed and touched his head embarrassedly.
, and Yu Feihong, when facing the same type of questioning, expressed more tactfully:
I don’t stand at the same level to evaluate
I never want to label myself
or fix it in a framework
, because others like
, so Xu Zhiyuan was embarrassed again.
Xu Zhiyuan's interview is the only one that can be considered harmonious. In my opinion, it is the issue of Chen Jiaying .
Teacher Chen is a well-known name when I was studying in the Department of Philosophy. He is a standard scholar-oriented literati. In short, he should be the most popular guest in the "Thirteen Invitations" launched so far.
But Xu Zhiyuan is full of admiration for philosophers like Chen.
When he interviewed Chen, Xu, as the host, was like a restless child in front of Chen for the first time. It was an interview with Xu, who was supposed to be Xu's question and answer, but it turned out that Xu raised his hand to ask a question.
He collapsed on the sofa in frustration and asked Chen: "I think I have too much self, I really hate me."
Chen showed a smile like a person who has experienced it, like comforting, and like sighing: "Do you really think this is not good?"
Later, when Xu reviewed this issue, he sent unprecedented praise:
In an era where almost all the criteria are determined, refined and even quantified, philosophy seems to be destined to be difficult to escape the embarrassing situation, even when everyone laughed and said "there is philosophy everywhere in life."
If Chen Jiaying is Xu Zhiyuan's male god, then Yu Feihong is Xu Zhiyuan's goddess.
Xu Zhiyuan revealed his fan's identity without reservation from the beginning: "She is the person I hope to appear in life."
mentioned many times in the middle that he loved Yu Feihong in "Xi Fu Club". He even invited Yu Feihong to watch this movie he loved again when recording the program.
"Ji Fu Club" is a Chinese female story produced by Hollywood in 1993, and the director is a Chinese American.
movie multi-threaded narrative, Yu Feihong actually doesn't have many scenes, but Xu Zhiyuan pointed to a look inside and kept exclaiming: "I'm really good at acting."
He also repeatedly savored another movie from Yu Feihong, " Love has a Next Life ", the art film that made Yu Feihong devote many years of hard work but suffered a box office Waterloo. What contrasts
is another question he asked: "Why do you want to act in " Little Husband "?"
is undeniable. He wants to ask Yu Feihong many questions, and even he has his own presets for all the questions.
I even guessed that his preset is the worst: is because of lack of money.
How many people noticed that at the end of the show, Yu Feihong asked Xu Zhiyuan back: "Why do you want to do this show?"
Xu Zhiyuan said himself: "Because I have built a bookstore that is not profitable, I have to do some other things to make money."
But everyone else gave him an almost identical answer: because different cultures are equal.
In Luo Pang's view, this equality is a fragmented output;
In Ma Dong's view, this equality is an unknown before the precipitation of the times;
In Feng Xiaogang's view, this equality means that the market is as important as aesthetics;
In Yu Feihong's view, this equality is a rebellious deconstruction of self-positioning.
Only Chen Jiaying gave him the answer he wanted.
awakens those sleeping people
Xu Zhiyuan's attitude is undoubtedly uncomfortable.
In this era when everything goes well (everything is fine), once you claim to be 5%, you will inevitably be backfired.
Because Xu Zhiyuan believed from the bottom of his heart that has something higher than others.
Although he did not express this directly, , this condescending built-in attitude cannot be hidden.
Because as long as a person chooses a certain superior vision, he will inevitably separate the world.
As long as a person chooses some standard of good and bad, he will inevitably put himself aside.
When a person chooses to put another part of his or her disadvantage, his pride will inevitably hinder the pride of the opposite side, and this pride will inevitably become an unbearable arrogance.
What is rare is that Xu Zhiyuan knows this kind of pride.
So he asked Chen in frustration "Is there a little bit of my self?" so he wrote "Xu Zhiyuan's prejudice" on the poster of the show, so he kept asking all the guests the same question.
He may not want to admit that this is an era of democracy.
The meaning of democracy is not political democracy, but ethical democracy. We are accustomed to putting everything in the same line of judgment and believe that this is a kind of plural and open rationality.
Today, we look at all the previous interview programs, Shui Junyi, Luyu , and even Dou Wentao . No one has ever dared to declare his prejudice so unrestrainedly, and no program will choose a host who will not speak according to his face like Xu.
Xu Zhiyuan was a person who was incompatible with the times from beginning to end.
So his anger that cannot be cured by growth, his middle-aged second-year who cannot be improved by the midlife crisis, his pedantic fusion of commercialized breaths—but it is these traits that have led him to successfully participate in a new media marketing he hates—even if it may be forced.
He tried hard to draw a clear line with the times, but he didn't expect that what the audience loved to watch the most was his painful struggle to draw a clear line with the times.
What a black humor.
This reminds me of a teacher who taught Chinese philosophy in the undergraduate degree. He was still the most ordinary lecturer until he retired.
of course it was not because of his academic ability. He was famous in his family and had a high academic reputation, but he still chose to reject the school's advice to promote him from lecturer to professor in an extraordinary way.
Someone asked him why, and he said, "I don't want to accept the benefits of anyone because I don't want to be interfered with my academic freedom. But if I take the benefits and I say something like bad things like before, my conscience will be dissatisfied."
He has never saved enough money to buy a house. The house he rented does not have a water heater. In winter, he took his employee card to take a bath in the student bathhouse. After retirement, he spent all his savings to buy a small bungalow in the countryside, and devoted himself to books.
He was very happy because he had not received any extra benefits except for his meager salary in his life, so his conscience was very stable.
Xu Zhiyuan If he knew that there were such people in this world, he would definitely be admired.
But Xu Zhiyuan is entangled.
He was confused that he could not be satisfied with this hermit-like way of leaving, and he still wanted to do something that could be recognized in this secular world.
He opened a bookstore and made "Thirteen Invitations", trying to provide some glimmer that he thought could help people get out of the cave.
It’s a pity that all his efforts now seem to be full of unspeakable absurdity.
The terrible thing about the commercial machine is that even the act of escapes commercialization itself will become the most ornamental commercialization trigger .
, finally, let’s talk about a private bias.
can also be regarded as the reason why I don’t want to easily mock "Xu Zhiyuan (people)":
I didn’t know why Bodhisattva could not become a Buddha -
is the magic power not strong enough or the practice is not horizontal enough?
Until one day, I went to a temple of Ksitigarbha, and wrote four big words on each side: Hell is not empty, and I will never become a Buddha.
I suddenly understood that Bodhisattvas are not unable to become Buddhas, but they are unwilling to become Buddhas.
Because the Buddha is not moved, his heart is not moved, and his four elements are already empty. His short-sightedness and ignorance towards mortals are as free as the existence of heaven and earth. But Bodhisattvas cannot do it, they cannot let go of sentient beings, so they are sentient beings; they want to save all sentient beings, so they are compassionate.
Many intellectuals, don’t they understand that as long as they let go of the so-called dialectics of the truth, their lives will be very happy. As long as they let go of their obsession with others and themselves, they can live a worldly life of self-interest. As long as they give up filling the gap in their hearts, they will have the most precious and rare mediocre perfection.
I may not be able to do it, but I am glad to see that they just don't want to.
This article's pictures are from the Internet
Sir movie original, WeChat ID: dushetv
WeChat search and follow: SirMovie
