At 6:30 am on December 10, Beijing time, Nicaragua announced that it had severed "diplomatic relations" with Taiwan. More than three hours later, Joint Communiqué of the People's Republic of China and the Republic of Nicaragua on the restoration of diplomatic relations was released.
The political arena on the island issued a grief of a "defeat" and demanded that the DPP authorities be held accountable for their foreign affairs policies and foreign affairs departments. The Tsai Ing-wen authorities condemned "friendly countries" and "bending their faith", but it is not new to them to lose "diplomatic diplomatic countries". During her tenure, she expressed "regrets" and "sadness" about "breaking diplomatic relations" by 8 times. During her tenure, Wu Zhaoxie alone, six countries "breaking diplomatic relations" were "breaking diplomatic relations", so Wu was called "minister of breaking diplomatic relations."
"Minister of Disconnection" is not Wu Zhaoxie's patent. During the eight years Chen Shui-bian's administration, there were 9 "breaks of diplomatic relations" and were allocated by four foreign affairs departments. In October 2005, Senegal's "breaking diplomatic relations", and the Kuomintang's representative of public opinion Jiang Xiao severely denounced Taiwan's foreign affairs department for "neither knows how to 'establish diplomatic relations' nor how to 'severe diplomatic relations'." When Jiang Xiaoyan was still called Zhang Xiaoyan, he served as the head of the foreign affairs department and knew the foreign affairs situation and origin of the Taiwan authorities. Since the People's Republic of China restored the legal seat of the United Nations in 1971, it has become an unstoppable trend to restore and establish diplomatic relations with the People's Republic of China under the one-China principle.
The Taiwan authorities' journey of losing the "diplomatic diplomatic state" is inevitable. However, as a fig leaf for external and internal, maintaining "diplomatic diplomatic countries" has become a heart-wrenching problem that they cannot let go. They are entangled in the increase or decrease of the number of "diplomatic diplomatic countries". After each "break of diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic bureaucracy diplomatic bureaucratic diplomatic bureaucratic diplomatic bureaucratic diplomatic bureaucratic diplomatic bureaucratic diplomatic bureaucratic diplomatic bureaucratic diplomatic bureaucratic diplomatic bureaucratic diplomatic bureaucratic diplomatic bureaucratic diplomatic bureaucratic diplomatic bureaucratic diploma After 2000, Chen Shui-bian's term was still produced despite four "ministers of severance of diplomatic relations". However, the extreme "Taiwan independence" elements made some ridiculous rhetoric, such as "breaking diplomatic relations" were broken from the "Republic of China". It would be better to simply cut off all of them and become "zero diplomatic relations". After establishing the "Taiwan State", they would "establish diplomatic relations" one by one. In Shiguanjun's opinion, this is a dream. Of course, the Taiwan authorities, especially the foreign affairs department, cannot bear the consequences of "zero diplomatic relations" and try their best to struggle. The means to maintain and expand "diplomatic diplomacy" are nothing more than "gold and Yuan diplomacy". Due to the rush to seek medical treatment, there was also a scandal of "being cheated".
Before Chen Shui-bian stepped down in 2008, the "Banjikin aid case" that shocked the political arena was revealed. The cause was that in 2006, Qiu Yiren, the then head of the security agency, and Huang Zhifang, the head of the foreign affairs department, remitted 29.8 million US dollars (about 1 billion NT$1) to the so-called "diplomacy brokers" in order to plan to "establish diplomatic relations" with Papua New Guinea . However, the money was cheated and the "diplomatic diplomatic relations" was not completed at all. The society on the island has always questioned whether the person in charge was simply deceived or had a conspiracy.
The period when Taiwan authorities were under relatively light pressure on foreign affairs situation was during the period after 2008 when Ma Ying-jeou took office. The two sides of the Taiwan Strait have resumed institutional consultations on the basis of the "1992 Consensus " that embodies the one-China principle. Ma Ying-jeou advocated a "diplomatic cession" on the island. In an atmosphere of goodwill, public opinion on the island often made suggestions that "the two sides of the Taiwan Strait are one family, and outsiders should not take advantage of the opportunity." However, in 2013, the "break of diplomatic relations" of Gambia also occurred, indicating that the reality of the international community generally agreeing with the "one China" principle has never changed.
After 2016, the Tsai Ing-wen administration refused to recognize the "1992 Consensus", and various provocations and actions of colliding with the red line put cross-strait relations in a dilemma. Maintaining a "diplomatic diplomatic state" has become an impossible task for the Taiwan authorities. After Trump was elected President of the United States, when Tsai Ing-wen was proud of being able to speak with him on the phone, the news of "breaking diplomatic relations" fell. In December 2016, Sao Tome and Principe "breaking diplomatic relations" with Taiwan, kicking off the first scene of "breaking diplomatic relations" during Tsai's tenure. At that time, some public opinion on the island pointed out that the United States always plays a strange role in Taiwan's external environment and often uses threats, harshness and other means to help maintain "diplomatic diplomatic countries". However, the United States itself "breaks off diplomatic relations" with Taiwan as early as 1978, which was full of hypocrisy and self-contradictory.
data photo US White House Xinhua News Agency posted
but "people who pretend to be sleep can never wake up", the DPP authorities' posture of being willing to be a chess piece on the American chariot has never changed. By 2021, the US president has been replaced. The Tsai administration relied on the US's narration and colluded with some US politicians, but the fantasy of "expanding international space" continues to ferment. Recently, people were sent to attend the so-called "Democracy Summit" to be complacent for the opportunity to show off under the guise of "democracy". Before, they were jumping up and down with small Eastern European countries, and there was a shadow of the United States behind them. Nicaragua's "break of diplomatic relations" once again brought back the true face of things - the result of "relying on the United States to seek independence" is to fall into a dilemma again and again, and it also proves that when joining the unreliable "alliers" and walking on the wrong path, the end will be a desperate situation.
Where will the only 14 "diplomatic countries" left by the Taiwan authorities go in the future? Taiwan Affairs Office spokesman Ma Xiaoguang said on December 10 that he welcomes the few so-called "diplomatic countries" in Taiwan to recognize the general trend and stand on the right side of history as soon as possible.
Whether it is the loss of Taiwan's so-called "diplomatic diplomatic state"
or the narrow
presents both the international community recognizes the reality of one China
and the principles and morals that should be held in international relations
On a global scale, the space of "two Chinas" and "one China and one Taiwan" is zero
In this regard, the momentum repeats the old saying of
the world trend, the vast
that follows it and prosper, and those who go against it die
(Original title: Stop dreaming about it! "Zero diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diplomatic diploma
