"The Civilization Roots and Discourse Communication of the Chinese Road"
——The First High-end Forum on Cultural Power of the Central Party School (National School of Administration) was held in Beijing
On September 24, the First High-end Forum on Cultural Power of the Chinese Civilization and China Road Research Center, International Communication Research Center, and the Department of Literature and History Teaching and Research was held in Beijing. The forum announced the official establishment of the "Center of Chinese Civilization and China Road Research" and the "Center of International Communication Research" of the Central Party School (National School of Administration). With the theme of "Civilization Roots and Discourse Communication of the Chinese Road", it deeply explores the civilized roots of the Chinese road, and deepens the academic construction of the Chinese road based on Chinese civilization, builds a Chinese discourse and Chinese narrative system that integrates China and foreign countries, and improves international communication capabilities.
Xie Chuntao, the vice president of the Central Party School (National School of Administration), who is in charge of daily work in the Central Party School (National School of Administration), attended the meeting and delivered a speech. Gao Xiang, deputy director of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, deputy secretary of the Party Group (ministerial level), president of the Chinese Academy of History and secretary of the Party Committee, was invited to attend and delivered a speech. Li Yi, vice president of the Central Party School (National School of Administration), Qu Yingpu, president and editor-in-chief of the China Daily, Yan Wenbin, former vice president of Xinhua News Agency, and Wang Xuedian, member of the Standing Committee of the 13th National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference, executive director of the Institute of Confucianism of Shandong University and editor-in-chief of the magazine "Literature, History and Philosophy". Director of Education and Director of the Department of Literature and History of the Central Party School (National School of Administration) Li Wentang presided over the first unit of the forum and made a summary. The scholars attending the meeting conducted in-depth exchanges and discussions on issues such as the sinicization of Marxism, the path of Chinese civilization and the Chinese, the comparison of civilizations and the new forms of human civilization, exchanges and mutual learning of civilizations and discourse innovation, international communication and the construction of China's narrative system.
Some leaders, experts, scholars from the Central Propaganda Department, the Central Party School (National School of Administration), the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Xinhua News Agency, China Daily, China Foreign Languages Bureau , Peking University , Tsinghua University , Renmin University of China , Shandong University , Communication University of China, East China University of Political Science and Law, East China Normal University, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, the University of Texas, Henan Provincial Department of Culture and Tourism, Oriental Publishing House and other units attended the meeting. "Literature, History, Philosophy", "Research on Historical Theory", "Chinese Political Science", " Modern Communication ", "Foreign Social Sciences", "Journal of the Central Party School of the Communist Party of China (National School of Administration), " Administrative Management Reform ", as well as media reporters from China Daily, Guangming Network , China Net, Pengpai News , Observer Network , China Social Science Network and other publications were invited to attend the meeting. More than 100 people attended the meeting online and offline.
Unit 1: Speech and Keynote Speech
Xie Chuntao
In his speech, Xie Chuntao, the vice-school (dean), who is in charge of daily work in the Central Party School (National School of Administration), first introduced the background of establishing two research centers and holding the Forum on the Cultural Power. He pointed out that in order to study and implement General Secretary Xi Jinping’s series of important speeches on the “two combinations” of the sinicization of Marxism, the Chinese civilization and the Chinese road, and strengthen and improve international communication work, the Central Party School (National School of Administration) (College) Committee decided not long ago to establish the Chinese Civilization and China Road Research Center and the International Communication Research Center, which is affiliated with the Department of Literature and History Teaching and Research, and organizes the school’s cross-departmental forces to strengthen research, and at the same time strengthen academic exchanges with domestic and foreign countries. In combination with the theme of this forum, he put forward specific requirements for the work of the two "centers": First, we must take Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era as our guide, adhere to the "two combinations" of the sinicization of Marxism, deepen the academic research on the Chinese path based on Chinese civilization, and accelerate the construction of Chinese discourse and Chinese narrative system; Second, we must accelerate the construction of a discourse system that disseminates the outside world, integrate "Tao" into the stories, tell Chinese stories well, and enhance international discourse power; Third, we must temper a group of ideological and academic generals to form a talent team with interdisciplinary and cross-civilized communication capabilities.
Gao Xiang
Vice President and Deputy Secretary of the Party Group of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, President and Party Secretary of the Chinese Academy of History, On behalf of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, the establishment of the two "centers", expressed that they will fully support the construction and development of the two centers, work together to provide intellectual support for the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation. He believes that the Chinese path has emerged from the long-standing civilization of the Chinese nation for more than 5,000 years, and has a profound historical origin and realistic foundation. General Secretary Xi Jinping's series of important speeches profoundly reveal the inner connection between Chinese civilization and the Chinese path. He talked about his three understandings: First, the inheritance and deep accumulation are the distinctive characteristics of Chinese civilization. The excellent traditional Chinese culture is the spiritual root of the Chinese nation, forging unique ideological concepts and cultural genes, and the confidence of our historical confidence; Second, the Chinese path has been accumulated in the history of Chinese civilization, and what kind of historical path a country takes is determined by the historical traditions and social forms of this country; Third, creating the future in inheriting history, the Communist Party of China is the loyal heir and developer of the excellent traditional Chinese culture.
Li Yi
In the keynote speech, Vice President of Li Yi (Dean) of the Central Party School (National School of Administration) believed that from "one combination" to "two combinations" is a rich development of the connotation of the sinicization of Marxism, a new improvement in the understanding of the regularity of Marxism, and an important ideological symbol of the new leap in the sinicization of Marxism. It has opened up a new realm of the sinicization of Marxism, and its significance is reflected in four aspects: First, from "one combination" to "two combinations" , is a reflection of the development process of the sinicization of Marxism, and is also a symbol of its rich and rich development of its thoughts; second, from "one combination" to "two combinations", it reflects the cultural mission, responsibility and responsibility of contemporary Chinese Communists; third, from "one combination" to "two combinations", it strengthens the awareness of cultural rejuvenation that will inevitably accompany the rejuvenation of the national rejuvenation of ; fourth, from "one combination" to "two combinations", it makes China's excellent traditional culture the source of the sinicization of Marxism and becomes an ideological resource for creating a new form of human civilization.
Wang Xuedian
Executive Dean of the Institute of Confucianism of Shandong University, Wang Xuedian, delivered a keynote speech entitled "Oriental Historical and Cultural Traditions and the Governance of a Super Large Country". He specifically analyzed the characteristics of China and believed that China is a super-large, multi-ethnic and historical country. To control such a country, it must rely on an organized force to maintain a unified situation; and China's major task in the 20th century was to rebuild the core force of Chinese society. This reconstruction was only completed in the hands of the Communist Party of China, and the leadership of the Party was established as a fundamental national system. Westerners cannot understand this if they do not understand Chinese history. The concept of unification comes from Confucianism . Its social governance theory has three major heritages, and it still has special significance today. One is the wise politics, selecting talents and appointing talents; the second is the moral economy, which is similar to the socialist market economy; the third is the worldism of Confucianism , which emphasizes that the world is for the public. At the same time, we also need to face up to the limitations of Confucian social theory, such as checks and balances of imperial power and weak protection of individual rights, so Confucianism needs creative transformation and innovative development.
Qu Yingpu
China Daily President and Editor-in-Chief Qu Yingpu gave a keynote speech entitled "First Confidence and Tell the World the Story of Excellent Traditional Chinese Culture". He pointed out that the civilizational roots and dissemination of discourse of China's path need to promote the peace concept of harmony and symbiosis, harmony and difference, and tell the story of China always being a world peace builder; promote the world view of unity and one world, and tell the story of China always being a defender of international order; promote the development concept of profits that should be planned and profits of the world, and tell the story of China always being a contributor to global development; promote the diverse civilization concept of equality, inclusiveness, exchanges and mutual learning, and tell the story of China always being a advocate of common values for all mankind.
Yan Wenbin
In his keynote speech entitled "International Discourse Power and the Construction of China's Narrative System", Yan Wenbin, former vice president of Xinhua News Agency, put forward four suggestions for building a Chinese narrative system: First, grasp the time and trend of China's development, adhere to the destruction and establishment of Chinese narrative, and build the roots and soul of Chinese stories; Second, create a Chinese narrative label, build a discourse system for world consensus, empathy and consensus sharing, and promote the global expression of Chinese stories and Chinese voices; Third, adhere to the global development initiative and establish a Chinese version of the narrative system based on Chinese culture and China's development; Fourth, set agenda, refine concepts, aim at the best nodes, dare to speak, speak quickly, and be able to speak, and realize the transformation of Chinese narrative from passive response to active attack.
Unit 2: Chinese Civilization and China Road
Cao Weidong
Zhang Jun
The morning meeting seminar was co-chaired by Cao Weidong, Secretary of the Party Committee of Beijing Sports University, and Zhang Jun, Deputy Director of the Department of Literature and History of the Central Party School (National School of Administration).
Wang Hui
In his speech entitled "The Historical Location of China in the 20th Century", Professor Wang Hui, Director of the Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences of Tsinghua University, pointed out that in order to understand the Chinese path, it is necessary to combine the 5,000-year history of civilization and the relationship between the drastic social changes that took place in the 20th century and the history of civilization. There are two special premises to understand China in the 20th century. One is that during the turmoil in the 20th century, China became the only civilization that maintained the original regional population and its historical continuity. Therefore, it is necessary to give a dialectical explanation of the issue of revolutionary change and historical continuity as a problem; the other is that in the 1990s, China implemented profound economic reforms under the conditions of maintaining the continuity of the basic political structure, which formed a new dialectical relationship between change and continuity. In addition, if China is not placed in the global upheaval of the 19th and 20th centuries, the uniqueness of China's path will not be seen. Among the series of revolutions that took place in the marginal areas of capitalism in the 20th century, the Chinese revolution is the most important, profound and broadest revolution, with a far-reaching impact on global history. Without the narrative framework of world history, a new explanation of Chinese civilization history and Chinese path cannot be given.
Huang Ping
Researcher Huang Ping, Director of the Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macao Research Center of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, made a speech entitled "Continuity of China's Road". He pointed out that to discuss the continuity of China's path, we must deal with the relationship between and and reality. Usually, we look at reality from the right, but we can also understand a certain right from the right. In fact, the continuity of civilization history itself constitutes the factual legitimacy of the Chinese path. The Chinese path has emerged from more than 40 years of reform and opening up, more than 70 years of construction and exploration, more than 100 years of party founding, the history of anti-imperialism, anti-colonialism and international communism since 1840, and even thousands of years of Chinese culture. Continuity, rather than breaking, constitutes a major feature of the Chinese path, which is completely different from European modernity. But it is also necessary to answer at the appropriate level to avoid the question of what happened yesterday and that the future was inevitable. We must answer questions such as why the Chinese path can be continued, how it can be continued, why it is reasonable, universal and special.
Li Huaiyin
Professor Li Huaiyin of the Department of History of the University of Texas Austin Campus shared through the link "The Myth of Eurocentrism and the Chinese Path of the Formation of Modern Countries". He believes that the "myth" of Eurocentrism is mainly reflected in two points: first, regarding the European experience formed by modern countries as the only correct path, and only by changing from empire fission to many nation-states can the principle of "national sovereignty" be reflected; second, it is believed that only one person, one vote is the true embodiment of the principle of "people's sovereignty". However, they did not notice the "large" size of China and the "strong" structure of China, and then ignored the uniqueness and continuity of China's modernization transformation process.He emphasized that the formation process of modern China is not a break between the empire and the nation-state, but a transformation from a pre-modern territorial state to a modern sovereign state. This process maintains the continuity of territory, population and ethnic group, reflecting the "large" of China's size; at the same time, modern China is a "strong country" formed by internally shaping strong political identity and establishing a unified and concentrated fiscal and military force in the process of solving various problems caused by the downward movement of central power in the late Qing Dynasty, reflecting the "strong" of China's structure. Therefore, to correctly understand the formation process of modern China, we must get rid of the Eurocentristic historical thinking and return to China's historical reality for hundreds of years to find the answer.
Xie Maosong
National Innovation and Development Strategy Research Association Director of the Center for Research on Chinese Civilization and China Roads and member of the Expert Group on New National System Strategy of the Ministry of Science and Technology. His speech title is "Connecting Ancient and Modern Chinese and Western Malaysia: Basic Issues of Chinese Civilization and China's Road". He emphasized the need to have a "complete" understanding of the relationship between Chinese civilization and the Chinese path, and put forward the basic framework and basic issues of Chinese civilization and the research on Chinese path. These basic issues include: the Chinese path is connected to ancient and modern Chinese, Western and Malaysia, and has the universality of the civilization principle of "Tao" and "Tao Orthod"; the underlying structure of Chinese civilization and the "way that can be big or long-lasting"; the comparison of politics and religion in China and the West; the inheritance and innovation of Chinese civilization in terms of value and system, and the Communist Party of China is a civilized political party.
Wu Ying
Director of the Foreign Historical Theory and Historical History Research Office of the Institute of Historical Theory of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Director of the Center for Historical Theory Research, and Executive Deputy Editor-in-Chief of "Historical Theory Research", Researcher Wu Ying started from the writing method of civilization history and briefly analyzed the defects of the existing writing method and the appropriate response strategies. He believes that the writing of civilization history should have a vision of world history and a comparative vision, strive to learn from the lessons of Western civilization history writing, highlight the main position of Chinese people, reflect China's historical view and values, and reflect our identity consciousness. This requires the transformation of focus and entry point: the writing of civilization history should focus on "people" rather than starting from "capital". This also means that we must handle the relationship between writing methods and materialist historical view, and make good use of materialist historical view to write our civilization history.
Jiang Linchang
School of History and Culture, Shandong University Professor Jiang Linchang gave a keynote speech entitled "Ring the Mediterranean Sea and the Pacific Rim: Two Civilization Forms of the Ancient World". He compared and analyzed the different characteristics of the two civilization forms, namely the "breakthrough" of the ancient Greek civilization and the "continuity" of the Chinese civilization from the perspective of geographical environment and the "similarity" of the Chinese civilization. Among them, ancient Greek civilization has the characteristics of Mediterranean , while Chinese civilization has the characteristics of Pacific Ocean. Zhang Guangzhi Mr. Zhang once said that according to ancient Chinese history, we can clearly and effectively reveal the new laws of human historical changes. This law may represent the cultural laws of the cultural continuum of most parts of the world. Therefore, when establishing laws that apply to the whole world, we must not only use Western historical experience, but also especially China's historical experience. He quoted Zhang Guangzhi's view and further explained his conclusion, that is, just as the civilization theory summarized by Marx and Engels based on materials from ancient Greece and and ancient Roman can be applied to the ancient civilization forms of the Mediterranean, the civilization theory summarized by ancient Chinese materials can also be applied to the ancient civilization forms of the Pacific.
Ren Feng
Professor , School of International Relations, Ren Feng, editor-in-chief of "Chinese Political Science" and deputy director of the Center for Historical Political Science Research, made a speech entitled "Re-understanding the Tradition of Style and Theory: "A Hundred Years of Solitude" in "The History of Pre-Qin Political Thought".On the occasion of the publication of Liang Qichao's "History of Political Thought in Pre-Qin" for 100 years, he reminded us to pay attention to the significance of this book for the establishment of our independent knowledge system from two perspectives: one is from the perspective of civilization and the country. Liang Qichao reflected on the competition between Western civilization and the country, and emphasized the mission of Chinese civilization and cosmopolitanism. The other is the issue of the subject matter in the context of the founding of a country thinker and the republic. Liang Qichao also reflected on the excessive emphasis on the transplantation of political systems since the late Qing Dynasty, and emphasized the role of multi-dimensional political subject, political value, etiquette governance and great unification. Comprehensive analysis of these two angles will help us think more comprehensively about the political path of modern China and the roots and ways out of our political order.
Wang Bo
In his online speech entitled "The Issue of Order and Chinese Philosophy", Professor Wang Bo emphasized the fundamental significance of the Issue of Order to Chinese philosophy and the cultural characteristics of historical China revealed from this. The spiritual achievements of the classical era are reflected in the Five Classics, which all revolve around the issue of order, but each has its own emphasis. After the collapse of rituals and music, the thinking of rebuilding order opened the era of Chinese philosophy and made the issue of order a core issue of Chinese philosophy. In Confucianism, a fundamental shift from the order given by heaven to the order born from man has emerged, and man has become the core issue. Confucian philosophy centers on the order that people and conform to people, and on the human life world, especially the ethical world and the political world, thus establishing order metaphysical . But at the same time, this order has never left the dimension of heaven. The basic form of Chinese philosophy is the study of heaven and man, not simply human learning. The human-centered thinking on order has allowed heaven to gain a new understanding from the perspective of man, which is different from the classical era.
In the final discussion in the morning, Director Li Wentang raised a question that President Li Yi (dean) also paid attention to, that is, many scholars talked about the relationship between the continuity and drastic changes in Chinese history in the morning, but in what aspects are the specific manifestations of continuity and drastic changes? He believes that this issue is related to the important issue of how to write the history of Chinese civilization, tell Chinese stories, and thus form Chinese discourse and Chinese narrative system.
He further explained that several major civilizations have their basic orders. Voglin "Order and History" specifically talks about the relationship between this basic order and historical changes. Professor Wang Bo just now also discussed the Confucian view of order from a philosophical perspective. In the basic order of Chinese civilization, the unified order mentioned by Professor Wang Xuedian and Professor Li Huaiyin on the power relationship between the central and localities constitute some aspects of the basic political order of Chinese civilization. Even in the late Qing Dynasty, it basically defended the super-large-scale population and territory state form in a weak authority manner. However, this governance model has shaken and rebuilt in the process of colonial invasion and modernization, and the Communist Party of China has rebuilt a unified national governance model through new social mobilization. He said that this is also a question that Professor Wang Hui has been concerned about for many years, which is how the Communist Party of China uses new party mobilization to rebuild civilized order with new culture and people's nature, thereby completing super-large-scale national governance. Therefore, he asked Professor Wang Hui to respond to this issue.
Professor Wang Hui responded that just now, several professors such as Professor Li Huaiyin, have talked about the issue of political integration. From the perspective of political civilization , there are generally three main models of political integration. One road is party politics , parliamentary politics, which is what we call modern Western democracy model. However, in most dynasty countries, this integration is not successful, and this process is mostly related to political division, because party politics is related to the separation of various interest groups, local forces, and ethnic groups. This is also why most dynastic countries re-approve the centralized power when facing a separatist situation. For example, in Yuan Shikai , this creates a second model, which is to transform political integration into state integration, and completely use administrative power to tolerate the entire system. This is the path of modern nationalism. But this process was not successful either.The third model is the path of the Chinese revolution, which mobilizes socially in a revolutionary way, forming a continuous process of change from bottom to top and top to bottom interaction. This revolutionary order has been permeating all grassroots cells. The formation of this path began with the entry of the Communist Party of China into the countryside, and political reintegration was carried out through the process of agrarian revolution. He said that I used the word "people's war" to express this integration in the past, but this is not only in the military sense, because this process is also a process of political mobilization, economic reform, national construction, and social organization, and almost all of these processes are completed in a highly mobilized process. He believes that the revolutions of other socialist countries in were established in a major revolutionary change, and China's national construction took place in the long-term process of the revolution. The growth of order is continuously linked to the revolutionary process, thus being grassroots and fundamental. No socialist country has established order so deeply in the most basic social cell, so it is indeed a social revolution, which has also spawned a new order. This was difficult for intellectuals to understand at that time, such as Liang Shuming . Therefore, we cannot talk about the reconstruction of order without the revolutionary process, but should understand the relationship between the drastic changes and continuity of modern China in this sense, and think about the civilizational roots of the Chinese path.
Unit 3 Civilization exchange and dissemination
Dong Qing
Gaozu Gui
The afternoon meeting seminar was chaired by Dong Qing, Director of the International Cooperation Department of the Central Party School (National School of Administration), and Gao Zugui, Dean of the International Strategy Research Institute.
Qiang Shigong
Professor of Peking University Law School and Director of the Department of Social Sciences of Peking University Qiang Shigong in his speech ""Cross Civilization" and "New Frontier" - Taking Frontiers as Methods" pointed out that today's regional research in the academic community basically continues the Western academic community's Orientalism and imperial research tradition, forming the basic paradigm of the center and edge, civilization and barbarism, us and others, especially the West and the East. This imperial-frontier paradigm eventually forms imperial-civilization self-centerism. China's regional research should criticize Western imperial-civilization-centrism with "New Worldism" with a global perspective, take the frontier as a method, attach importance to the "activity" of the frontier, and regard the frontier as a "active frontier" in the cross-civilization perspective; attach importance to the " inter-intermediate nature" of the frontier, and regard it as an intermediary area for different civilizations to communicate, tolerate, learn and absorb each other; attach importance to the "revolutionary" of the frontier, and regard it as a revolutionary force that destroys the center. Finally, he emphasized the need to regard civilization as the "unfinished thing" that needs to be created and generated, and the spiritual power of free creation should be used as the source of vitality for the formation, transformation and development of civilization.
Li Xiguang
Tsinghua University International Communication Research Center Director and former executive vice president of the School of Journalism and Communication, in his speech "Epilogy of the New Situation and New Form of Human Civilization", pointed out that Western modernity is based on the level of civilization. Western colonialism and imperialism ideology invaded other countries under the banner of enlightenment and civilization, carried out "knowledge cleaning" of the excellent civilizations of mankind for thousands of years, and denied the political legitimacy and knowledge legitimacy of other civilizations. This outdated narrative of civilization forms brings greater chaos to the world. China should deepen cross-civilization cooperation and dialogue with Eurasian continent and other like-minded countries in the world, transcend the narrow and backward ideology created by imperialism and neo-colonialism since modern times, and make the ideology of Western colonists lose its appeal through the joint efforts of thinkers, academic circles and media in non-Western countries, and replace the ideas of Western colonists and Western imperialism with our ideas. The community with a shared future for mankind and the new form of human civilization advocated by China transcends the old narrative of the East-West civilization of North Atlanticism.
Yu Yunquan
Yu Yunquan, Director of the Contemporary China and the World Research Institute of the China Foreign Languages Administration, made a speech entitled "Civilization Exchange and Mutual Learning and Foreign Discourse Innovation". He believes that integrating China and foreign countries is the best path for foreign discourse innovation, and the knowledge system is the source of foreign discourse innovation.The exchanges and mutual learning of civilizations have been widely recognized by the international community. Only by taking the diversity of civilization as the foundation, the equality of civilization as the premise, the inclusiveness of civilization as the driving force, and the integration of civilization as the characteristics can we achieve emotional "empathy", "common in theory" and "sharing" in value in international dialogue. In specific practice, a platform can be built to form a discourse innovation communication mechanism; guide discussions, construct discourse in rational dialogue; enhance experience, enrich external discourse innovation perception; know yourself and the enemy, and let discourse innovation be implemented through interaction, etc.
Cao Weidong
In his speech entitled "Habermas's Civilization Exchange Theory and Its Contemporary Significance", Professor Cao Weidong, Secretary of the Party Committee of Beijing Sports University, pointed out that civilized exchange or tracing the origin of civilization must grasp a universal validity requirement, that is, acceptability, which is the most basic category of Habermas's communication behavior theory. Today, when studying the international communication of civilization roots or the Chinese road discourse system, we need to consider the acceptability of the communication content and further construct an acceptable ideal language environment. At the same time, finding the possibility of communication and dialogue among different civilizations requires returning to the axis era to rethink the dilemma that Western culture is trapped, and using the revolutionary power of Marxist practical philosophy, the revolutionary force of self-reflection of Western modernity, it is both transcendent and has not fallen into binary opposition to reflect and transcend Western culture. Here we can see a new perspective on the integration of Marxism with the excellent traditional Chinese culture, and have a deeper dialogue and exchange on the roots of Chinese civilization, the roots of the Chinese path, and the realistic discourse of the Chinese path.
Yang Rongjun
Professor of the School of Marxism of East China University of Political Science and Law and Executive Deputy Editor-in-Chief of "Foreign Social Sciences" Yang Rongjun believes in his speech entitled "The Road of Chinese-style Modernization and International Discourse Communication" that Chinese-style modernization is initiated and developed under the conditions of world history, and is also determined by the special historical situation of modern and contemporary China. The Chinese-style modernization path is a modernization that brings together the three dimensions of history, reality and the future. When we spread the path of Chinese modernization in international discourse, we must first clarify that this is a modernization path that unites universality and particularity. We are often accustomed to emphasizing and spreading the particularity and uniqueness of the modernization of socialism with Chinese characteristics, while ignoring the universality and learnability of it. Secondly, it is necessary to present a modern path that is an organic and unified whole, with systematic, comprehensive and coordinated characteristics. This is a modernization path that is harmoniously coexisting between economy and society, man and nature, in line with the future development direction of mankind and the common pursuit of human nature liberation. Finally, we must make it clear that Chinese-style modernization is a modernization path with a world pattern and a global perspective.
Zhou Yong
6 Executive Dean of the School of Journalism, Renmin University of China and Vice Chairman of the National Journalism and Communication Degree Postgraduate Education Steering Committee, in his speech entitled "Construction of International Communication Disciplines for the Future", pointed out that the future development of China's international communication disciplines must anchor the basis of "taking China as the foundation and the world as the oriented", uphold the open subjectivity, and face the practical community, multi-disciplinary, national society, and strengthen the width, thickness and depth of discipline construction in various application scenarios (skills), multi-disciplinary synthesis (intellectual), and the underlying logic (morality) based on Chinese and Western cultures. First, expand the "width" to adapt to the skill training of multi-scenario, multi-lingual, and multi-level diverse application scenarios. The second is to improve the "thickness", integrate multiple humanities and social science disciplines such as international politics, economics, law, sociology, and philosophy, promote interdisciplinary integration and cultivation, open up the "1+1+N" training model (i.e. news, foreign languages and other disciplines), and carry out multi-disciplinary comprehensive intellectual training. The third is to strengthen "deep" and cultivate virtue from the artifact level to the conceptual level.
Sui Yan
Dean of the School of Journalism, Communication University of China and editor-in-chief of "Modern Communication" Professor Sui Yan pointed out in his speech entitled "Group Communication: The Essence of the Internet" that the essential attribute of the Internet is the extremely diversified group cluster communication of the communication subject.This group has anonymity and high uncertainty. On the one hand, it has shaped new social modes and social scenarios in society, released active and creative social forces, and provided new vitality and opportunities for communication. But at the same time, while the Internet expands the scale of group gathering, it also implies powerful emotional explosive power, amplifies the irrational power in the group's psychology, and thus strengthens the social risks in communication.
Lu Xinyu
In his speech entitled "Leninism and War and Peace in the Twenty-first Century", Professor Lu Xinyu, Director of the Institute of Asian Marxism Communication at East China Normal University, believed that the Russian-Ukrainian conflict is still an extended version of Cold War , and is an inevitable and realistic consequence brought by the logic of the Western "clash of civilizations" theory. The new Cold War "containment strategy" that the United States is building not only points to post-Cold War Russia, but also to "communist" China. Chinese civilization should be the equal subject of mutual learning and exchange between civilizations. Socialist values themselves are the result of integrating human civilization from ancient and modern times. We need to use this as a basis to draw a clear line between the hierarchy theory of Western civilization and the conflict theory of , establish an international united front and people's front that opposes hegemony on a global scale, especially with the global south, and strives for world peace, and reshape the historical logic and strategic map from internationalism to a community with a shared future for mankind - this is the key to China's international communication capacity building.
Zhang Mingxin
Dean of the School of Journalism and Information Communication of Huazhong University of Science and Technology and a member of the Journalism and Communication Discipline Review Group of the State Council Academic Degree Committee, Professor Zhang Mingxin pointed out when talking about the "Difficults and Strategies of International Communication of China's Discourse" that Chinese discourse has its own practical care, cultural characteristics and value pursuits, and the international communication of Chinese discourse has world significance. Chinese discourse not only focuses on China's better integration into the world, but also focuses on human development and civilization progress. The current dilemma of international dissemination of China's discourse is that the subjectivity awareness needs to be strengthened. We must build an independent and independent knowledge construction and dissemination system based on Chinese experience, and improve the ability to produce, supply, circulation and transform discourse in the international community. Secondly, the channels and structure of international dissemination of China's discourse need to be optimized. China needs to make every effort to build a new internationally first-class mainstream media, build a three-dimensional communication channel matrix, and build a diverse cross-cultural exchange platform. Again, we must seek greater consensus in global mutual learning of civilizations and dialogue on knowledge. China's current national discourse needs to be improved in terms of the meticulousness and explanatory power of the conceptual framework and theoretical system. We must build a more flexible and extended discourse interpretation space, balance the scale of discourse expression, and optimize the folk-oriented Chinese discourse communication efficiency.
Qin Lu
月
月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月月Neo-Jacobianism in the second half of the 20th century further created a new myth that the United States is the leader in human morality and politics. The strong discourse power of the Western world in international communication is based on self-certification of its civilized virtues, and it runs through the powerful Western thoughts - media - political network in the form of political ideology. In essence, the relationship between China and the West is fundamentally unable to recognize and endure a country with non-Western civilization and successfully achieve modernization in a non-Western modernization way, which will gradually collapse the value of Western civilization based on the principle of universality. After the speech session of
, some scholars on the spot asked questions and exchanged and interacted with the speakers.
Professor Liu Chenguang from the Science and Society Department of the Central Party School asked questions to the speakers
Professor Wang Dongqi from the Party Building Department of the Central Party School exchanged with the speakers
Associate Professor Shen Weipeng from the Arts and History Department of the Central Party School asked questions and exchanges
Unit 4: Conference summary
Li Wentang
Li Wentang, Director of Education and Director of the Department of Literature and History of the Central Party School (National School of Administration) Li Wentang made a summary speech on behalf of the organizer. He further elaborated on the ideological background of the establishment of the two centers from an academic perspective, pointed out a series of international confrontations and conflicts in recent years, highlighting the importance of discourse power. He said that some original concepts of the Chinese path have been proposed and have been widely disseminated, but the construction of academic discourse has not yet been completed. This is not only a problem of the party's theoretical construction, but also an issue of academic support, education, art production and communication, etc. In a word, cultural leadership. During the Yan'an period, Mao Zedong reflected on the Western knowledge system and discourse system since the May Fourth Movement, and emphasized the "foreign dogma" that was both anti-rightist and anti-"left" and emphasized the historical view centered on China, emphasized the driving force within history and society, and emphasized the party's historical subjectivity and initiative. Today, our party further proposed the "two combinations" of the sinicization of Marxism, and further realized that our path and discourse system should be rooted in our civilized mother. On the one hand, we must face the international discourse power game, and at the same time complete internal ideological reconstruction. Only by producing a large number of thoughtful scholars, journalists, educators, artists, diplomats, translators, etc. can we master and spread our own knowledge system and discourse system. He believes that humanism, learning rationality, classical and historical traditions have shaped a social mobilization model with scholars as the core, which has continuously activated China's moral political civilization tradition and had a profound impact on today's Chinese path. Many scholars of this forum discussed the civilizational nature, independent knowledge system and discourse communication art of the Chinese path from different dimensions. The content is very rich, achieving the expected goals of this forum. Further exchanges will be organized in the future, in-depth discussions will be made to promote the construction of Chinese discourse and Chinese narrative system.
Source: Guangming.com-Theoretical Channel
