Marriage is a great joy in life, but a groom He from Taoyuan, Changde, Hunan Province, was asked by the woman to give an additional 40,000 yuan gift on the day of the wedding. The He family disagreed. As a result, a big day caused both parties to part with disagreement, and the wedding was cancelled.
Not long after, the newlywed couple went to court again because of the bride price. Recently, the Zhuxi Court of Taoyuan County People's Court heard the divorce case.
Network image
It is understood that the groom He and the bride Zhang fell in love with their menstrual period last February. In October last year, He went to the woman's house to propose marriage and paid a bride of 60,000 yuan and jewelry worth 16,000 yuan.
In January this year, the two of them registered their marriage at the Civil Affairs Bureau and set a wedding date. Unexpectedly, on the wedding day, when He went to Zhang's house to propose marriage, the woman suddenly asked for another 40,000 yuan in betrothal gift, otherwise she would not agree to marry Zhang.
The He family was very angry about the Zhang family's request and was unwilling to pay another 40,000 yuan in betrothal gift. The two families did not give in to each other, and the wedding was finally cancelled and both sides parted in disagreement.
After canceling the wedding, He filed for divorce, asking Zhang to return the 60,000 yuan gift and 16,000 yuan jewelry, but Zhang said that he could divorce, but he would not refund a penny. In desperation, He had no choice but to sue the court, hoping to divorce Zhang and request a return of the bride price.
The court held that He and Zhang voluntarily registered their marriage, and both parties should be well aware of the difficulty of establishing a family and should not regard marriage as a joke. Both parties should strengthen communication and understanding, face life difficulties together, and further ease the relationship between husband and wife. As long as both parties strengthen communication, they believe that there is a possibility of reconciliation. The presiding judge also patiently persuaded the two and did a lot of mediation, but the two sides never reached an agreement.
Since the plaintiff He did not submit sufficient evidence to prove that the relationship between the couple broke down, the court ruled to reject the plaintiff's lawsuit.
Statement: This article is reproduced for the purpose of conveying more information. If there is any error in the source marking or infringes on your legitimate rights and interests, please contact this website with the proof of ownership. We will correct and delete it in time. Thank you.
