Today, September 28, the Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council held a regular press conference, which coincided with the 30th anniversary of the founding of the Democratic Progressive Party. In response to a question from a reporter from "Strait Today", spokesperson Ma Xiaoguang of the Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council commented on this matter that has been going on for 30 years. Taiwan independence” political party.
Straits TV reporter asked: The Democratic Progressive Party is currently celebrating the so-called 30th anniversary of the founding of the party. From a mainland perspective, how do you evaluate the history of this party in the past 30 years and what are your expectations for its future?
Ma Xiaoguang, spokesman for the Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council: As we all know, the DPP has long adhered to the "Taiwan independence" party platform and insisted on the "Taiwan independence" separatist proposition of "one side, one country", undermined the political foundation for the peaceful development of cross-Strait relations, incited cross-Strait confrontation, and obstructed cross-Strait exchanges. , resulting in the good momentum and results of the peaceful development of cross-Strait relations since 2008 being seriously impacted and affected, and the vital interests of Taiwan compatriots being harmed. It can be said that if the Democratic Progressive Party does not give up "Taiwan independence", it will be difficult to find a way out in cross-strait relations. Whether it is pursuing radical "Taiwan independence" or pursuing the so-called gradual and flexible "Taiwan independence," it is doomed to fail.
For this political party that has been pursuing "Taiwan independence" for 30 years, there will naturally be no "birthday wishes" from the mainland. For the DPP, a stern "message" may not be "a good medicine that tastes bitter but is good for the disease". ", but if you continue to pretend to be asleep, no one will be able to wake you up. Ma Xiaoguang also warned Lee Teng-hui and others who clamored to promote the so-called "constitutional reform" that "Taiwan independence" is destined to be nothing more than a dream.
Ma Xiaoguang said: Compatriots on both sides of the Taiwan Strait may not have forgotten that during Chen Shui-bian's administration, he frantically tried to change Taiwan's status as a part of China through "constitutional reform" and "referendum", but suffered a shameful failure. If someone still wants to inherit the legacy of Lee Teng-hui and Chen Shui-bian, I think the end will not be good, and everyone can foresee it.
The editor noticed that Ma Xiaoguang also quoted a poem by Tang Dynasty poet Du Fu : "Your body and name will be destroyed, but the eternal flow of rivers will not be destroyed." As for the "Taiwan independence" elements, Du Fu, who has been very busy from more than 1,000 years ago to the present, has long predicted their fate: You people will be ruined in the end, and the world's trend will be as mighty as the Yangtze River, and It flows endlessly, rolling forward, and will last forever.
For the current Democratic Progressive Party, it has unprecedented power and displays unprecedented arrogance. In the face of mainland China's goodwill, the Democratic Progressive Party authorities refused to accept the "1992 Consensus" on the one hand, and rejected it on the other hand, claiming that "there should be no preconditions for cross-strait exchanges." In this regard, a spokesman for the Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council responded this way:
The "1992 Consensus" and the "One China" principle it embodies are objective facts that conform to the legal principles and reality of cross-Strait relations, and are not artificial preconditions. The consensus on was reached by both sides of the Taiwan Strait through communication and consultation and seeking common ground while reserving differences. It was not unilaterally imposed on Taiwan by us. When dealing with , both parties must first clarify the nature of their relationship. The key to the so-called lack of preconditions is not to recognize that both sides of the Taiwan Strait belong to "one China", that is, not to give up the stance of "two countries theory" and "one country on each side". By unilaterally destroying the common political foundation of both sides of the Taiwan Strait, the DPP authorities are actually imposing their denial of the consensus on the mainland. This is the prerequisite for cross-Strait exchanges and interactions. The editor of
secretly thinks that cross-strait relations are like two people dating. First of all, we need to confirm what kind of relationship the two people are, whether they are lovers, ordinary friends, or a working relationship. If the two parties have no consensus, can the relationship go smoothly? On the one hand, you don’t want to confirm the relationship, but on the other hand, you want the other party to treat you to dinner and give you gifts. Isn’t this deception? "Any relationship that is not for the purpose of marriage is a hooliganism"!
In a few days, Taiwan's "Double Ten Celebration" will be held. The outside world is paying attention to whether Tsai Ing-wen can hand in a qualified answer sheet. In this regard, the Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council once again warned the DPP authorities with sincerity:
Cross-Strait The practice of both positive and negative aspects of the relationship proves that different path choices determine different prospects.The key to safeguarding the peaceful development of cross-Strait relations lies in adhering to the political foundation of the "1992 Consensus". No matter what statements the leaders of the Taiwan authorities make, this hurdle cannot be circumvented.
Ma Xiaoguang reiterated: Our major policies towards Taiwan are clear and consistent. We will continue to adhere to the political foundation of the "1992 Consensus", resolutely oppose "Taiwan independence", resolutely safeguard the "One China" principle, and we will further expand exchanges between compatriots on both sides of the Taiwan Strait. exchanges, promote exchanges and cooperation in various fields, and build a cross-Strait community with a shared future. No force can block the historical process of the peaceful development of cross-Strait relations and the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation.
The words are old sayings, and the principles are old principles. After hearing these words, even the editor became a little impatient, and I believe other people are the same. Mainland China’s patience is not unlimited.
(original article, pictures from the Internet, please indicate the source for reprinting and sharing "Straits Today")
