reporter Xiao Caiwei/comprehensive report
Hollywood actor Amber Heard (also translated as Amber Heard, Amber Heard) lost the defamation lawsuit against her ex-husband Johnny Depp and was ordered to pay US$10.35 million in compensation ( About NT$300 million), but she was dissatisfied with the verdict and decided to appeal. However, even the insurance company that previously insured her was not supportive and refused to pay $8 million (approximately NT$238 million) for Amber Heard.
Amber Heard had purchased insurance before the lawsuit. (Photo / Reuters)
Foreign media "Daily Mail" revealed that Amber Heard purchased a $1 million liability insurance policy from "New York Marine and General Insurance Company" before suing Johnny Depp. , the purpose is that if you have to compensate your ex-husband after losing the lawsuit, the insurance company will bear part of the compensation amount.
However, the insurance company now refuses to pay Amber Heard US$8 million (approximately NT$238 million) on the grounds that Amber Heard's accusations against Johnny Depp are "false and malicious." In previous insurance contracts, it was stated that the insurance company could refuse to pay if there was "willful misconduct".
Amber Heard bit her finger in court. (Picture/ Reuters )
In order not to lose her pants, Amber Heard did everything possible, including pointing out that "inappropriate jurors participated in the verdict" in the post-trial motion filed by the team on the 1st. A No. 15 examiner's identity was suspected to be inconsistent with the information. The information stated that his birth year was 1945, but he looked younger, as if he was born after 1970. He suspected that someone was impersonating and asked the judge to review.
Amber Heard walked out of the courtroom lonely after losing the lawsuit. (Picture/Dazhi Image)
In addition, Amber Heard’s team pointed out that they have proved that they were raped by Johnny Depp many times, but the other party has no way to prove that he "never attacked Amber", nor did he. There was no way to prove that Amber Heard's column was written with malicious intent, so she asked the court to revoke the US$10.35 million (approximately NT$300 million) compensation verdict.
