(The Russian Ministry of Defense held a high-level meeting on the occasion of the Russian army's "liberation" of Luhansk)
According to Global Network , the report of the US Congress was published on the website of the US Naval Institute. This report attempts to analyze the current situation of the Ukrainian army. performance and future situation, in order to provide a basis for the next step of "support" from the United States. However, the report shows a very pessimistic attitude towards Ukraine's performance. The report believes that - the Ukrainian army had a brilliant performance in the early stages of the conflict, because the eight-year conflict in Donbass allowed Ukraine to retain a group of well-trained soldiers. Professional military personnel and retired veterans. However, this situation soon ceased to exist. As the conflict continued, the Ukrainian army suffered serious casualties, and the losses were often veterans. Now the Ukrainian army can only recruit new soldiers to increase its numbers, and due to the lack of front-line soldiers Nervous, even training has become hasty, and the combat effectiveness of the Ukrainian army has continued to decline.
(Ukrainian soldiers)
This report also mentioned the losses of the Ukrainian army in weapons and equipment. In fact, Kiev announced last month that they had lost about half of their equipment. Moreover, Ukraine claims that military aid from the United States and Western countries can only meet 10% to 15% of the needs of the front line, which means that Western military aid is obviously a drop in the bucket. In addition, the Ukrainian army is seriously lacking in heavy weapons. Although the United States clamored to provide the Ukrainian army with long-range strike equipment such as " Seamaster ", the quantity is not large, and ammunition is also restricted. This makes the Ukrainian army passive in front of the Russian army. The state of being beaten.
(File picture: "Haimas" rocket launcher)
The report of the US Congress clearly believes that the Ukrainian army's war performance is getting worse and worse, and this is different from the various cover-ups of Ukraine's failure by Western public opinion. After all, this is a report that must be used as a basis for Congress, and it cannot be explained with false information. However, the report was posted on platforms such as the U.S. Naval Institute website, which also shows that the Pentagon is pessimistic about military aid to Ukraine. In the early days of , Ukraine was able to compete with Russia, and even had a "half-measure" situation. This made the United States think that "the opportunity has come." For this reason, Western countries also "assisted" tens of thousands of sanctions against Russia. As a result, Russia did not move at all. After adjusting its strategy They are fighting against Ukraine, but the military aid from Western countries obviously has no effect.
(The Ukrainian army held out for two months at the Azov Steel Plant before surrendering)
The siege of Mariupol lasted for two months, which made the United States think that the Ukrainian army should be able to hold on for a long time in Donbass . Unexpectedly, Beidon The Battle of Netsk lasted only a month, and it was originally thought to be "Mariupol2.0". After the Ukrainian army retreated from Severodonetsk, they defended Lisichansk . As a result, Lisichansk was controlled by the Russian army in just one week. In the process, the Ukrainian army also lost a large number of troops, which means that the attrition problem mentioned in the US report will become more prominent in the future.
(In Severonetsk, the "Azot" chemical plant is completely unable to withstand the Russian offensive)
Seeing that Putin has ordered the Russian army to move towards Donetsk, fierce fighting will break out in many local cities. The U.S. report clearly set a pessimistic tone for the Ukrainian military in advance. This may cause the United States to reconsider its assistance to Ukraine, and it is not even ruled out that Western countries will once again send a signal asking Kyiv to negotiate. After all, Western countries are also "bleeding" now, and they always need to consider stopping losses when necessary. There is no doubt that the victim must be Ukrainian .
