Source: China Jingwei.com
The "Phoenix Cloud" news reported by Zhongtian News on February 18, 2019 was fined NT$400,000 by the NCC. (Reposted from Youtube "Zhongtian News" channel)
According to Taiwan's "China Times" report, Taiwan's Zhongtian News reported the Tainan "legislator" by-election the year before last. The Commission (NCC) imposed a fine of 400,000 yuan (NT$, the same below) in accordance with the so-called "Satellite Broadcasting and Television Law". Zhongtian filed a lawsuit, and the Taipei High Administrative Court found that when the NCC held a consultation meeting, 12 of the 16 members believed that it did not violate the "law", but the NCC ignored it, and decided to issue a fine based on the opinions of the other 4 members. The original trial failed to clarify this part of the investigation, so it found that Zhongtian's appeal was justified and sent it back for a new trial.
Zhongtian's noon news report on February 18, 2019 "Vision? ! "Phoenix Spreading Wings" clouds appeared in the sky when the three mayors merged", and the evening news re-reported "Folklore Experts: Luckily Now Marquis Lu Han gathered in the sky to show "Phoenix Cloud"? ! ", NCC believes that the content has not been verified, leading the public to combine specific political figures with the theory of strange powers and gods, and fined 400,000 yuan according to the "Wei Guang Law". Zhongtian filed a lawsuit to resist punishment, and appealed to Beigaohang after losing the first instance.
Bei Gaoxing found that the NCC had held a consultation meeting on this news. Among the 16 members present, 9 suggested "send a letter for improvement", and 3 suggested "not deal with it". At that time, there was no discussion on the recommendations of the consultation meeting, nor did they explain the reasons for not adopting the opinions of the majority of the committee members. They only picked up the opinions of the other four committee members in fragments, and directly determined that Zhongtian violated the "law". The original trial did not clarify this part, and did not perform its due diligence investigation obligation.
In addition, the original judge held that the by-election day was approaching, and the news was "harmful to the reliability of voting", but there was no evidence that affected voters' willingness to vote. Moreover, the news was marked with the words "Don't believe in folk beliefs", and the reporter narrated Explain the name and cause of "Phoenix Cloud" in Meteorology . It does not involve violence, bullying, etc., which may have a negative impact on children, or make readers anxious and frightened. Beigaoxing believes that the factual determination of the original trial Lack of factual evidence and violates the laws of reasoning.
Bei Gaoxing also pointed out that the photos of "Phoenix Cloud" broadcast were provided by netizens to the editor of the Zhongtian Facebook fan group. The departmental observation system inquired about the weather conditions. It can be seen that there is no verification at all, and the interviewees are not fictional characters. If the original trial has doubts about the verification process, it should notify the editor or reporter to testify. The whole case still needs to be investigated, so the original judgment is revoked and sent back More trial.
