This is naked contempt! The legitimate rights protection of Chinese consumers was ignored by Apple!
As we all know, Apple’s latest iPhone12 series has completely cancelled the random charging head. If you need it, you need to buy it yourself. Regarding the cancellation of the charging head, Apple’s statement is based on environmental protection.
But anyone with a discerning eye can find that this is just an excuse from Apple. This can be seen from the C-head charging data cable that comes with the iPhone12. If Apple really cancels the included charging head for environmental protection, it will definitely give priority to the charging cable with port A, so that some old iPhone users can directly use the charging head of the old version of the iPhone.
But obviously, Apple’s purpose is not simple. It cancels the charging head, but more to increase the profit margin of its new products.
And according to financial reports on January 27, the Chinese consumer Mr. Yang formally filed a lawsuit against Apple’s cancellation of the random gift of charging heads, and took Apple to court, demanding that Apple use the C-port lightning cable for free Replaced with port A adapter cable, provided matching port A charging head, and paid all litigation costs in this case.
Chinese consumers did it, but the ending is too ironic!
took Apple to court, Chinese consumers did it! You know, in terms of rights protection, Chinese consumers have been quite Buddhist since ancient times. Sometimes it is obvious that businesses are at a loss. Domestic consumers rarely choose to defend their rights, let alone defend their rights against international technology giants like Apple.
After the news of Chinese consumer Mr. Yang's legitimate rights protection was disclosed by the media, many domestic netizens were a little bit unbelievable for a while, but after reacting, they all expressed their support for Mr. Yang's decision to choose legitimate rights protection. However, it is regrettable that the legitimate rights protection of Chinese consumers was finally ignored by Apple. The ending is really ironic.
It is reported that after the formal hearing of this lawsuit, Apple did not send a representative to attend, and did not respond at all. It was completely "you sue you,I won’t even look at you with a straight eye." This is blatant contempt! Some legal professionals pointed out: Under normal circumstances, in the face of consumer lawsuits, Apple should send representatives to The court may issue a related statement, but Apple’s approach is quite arrogant, which can be said to be a blatant contempt for Chinese consumers and Chinese laws! Besides, Mr. Yang’s lawsuit is reasonable and Apple does owe consumers a reasonable explanation. _P1p
The ending is really ironic. Chinese consumers finally mustered up the courage to defend their rights, but they were ignored by Apple! And the irony is another reason, that is, abroad In the market, the arrogant Apple chooses to follow the rules!
Friends who bought the iPhone 12 should know that in addition to the iPhone 12 does not come with a charging head, it also cancels the wired headset. However, in a country, the new iPhone 12 is equipped with Lightning EarPods earphones with interfaces, and the price is equivalent to that of the iPhone 12 without earphones. This country is France.
The reason why Apple chooses to include earphones is also very simple. It respects French laws. According to reports, France has this. One law: Every smartphone sold in France must be accompanied by earphones (hands-free kits) to prevent electromagnetic radiation from harming local consumers.
You see, facing the French law, how good Apple is "Observe the rules"! However, in China, Apple has ignored the Chinese Consumer Protection Law and even allegedly flouted Chinese courts!
In addition to complying with the laws of other countries, in terms of the "degree of respect" for consumers, Chinese consumers It’s also not in the number. For example, as everyone knows, in the past few years, Apple had a scandal about frequency reduction, that is, through software means to limit the performance of the old iPhone to encourage consumers to buy the new iPhone. After the frequency reduction incident was exposed, many Apple users were not calm and chose to take up legal weapons to protect their legitimate rights and interests.
In the United States, facing the prosecution of American consumers, Apple finally compromised. All American consumers affected by the frequency reduction event,A compensation was paid. But in China, hundreds of millions of Chinese consumers who are also affected by down-frequency gates have been ignored by Apple.
Through the above two examples, I believe it is not difficult for everyone to find that Apple ignores the legitimate rights of Chinese consumers, which is a tradition that has existed since ancient times. Perhaps, in Apple’s view, Chinese consumers are indeed better bullied. They only need to give them a little benefit and they will rush to buy the new iPhone.
What is even more ironic is that the fact seems to be the same. Even though last year’s iPhone 12 has many slots, the buying enthusiasm of Chinese consumers does not seem to be affected at all.
Perhaps, this is Apple's courage to ignore Chinese consumers and despise Chinese laws.
.
