On July 14, Uzi’s Douyin account was suddenly banned. The reason for the ban was “alleged infringement.” Since Douyin and Uzi did not disclose the specific reasons for the suspension, many fans were discussing the matter, which aroused considerable public opinion.

. Uzi responded to Douyin account ban

On July 14, Uzi’s Douyin account was suddenly banned. The reason for the ban was “alleged infringement.” Since Douyin and Uzi did not disclose the specific reasons for the suspension, many fans were discussing the matter, which aroused considerable public opinion.

Subsequently, the Uzi operator released relevant content on Weibo, explaining the reason for the suspension: The creator of Uzi’s Douyin account was the RNG Club, and he joined Douyin in 2019. As one of the contents of the brokerage contract, the account was transferred to the former brokerage company Xiaoxiang Interactive Entertainment along with the brokerage contract. Now Uzi has changed his agency, but the account has not been transferred, which prevents Uzi from carrying out any activities and cooperation on Douyin in the future.

Uzi’s current brokerage company and the former brokerage company failed to achieve results after three months of negotiations, so they could only create a new account. The old account filed an account ownership dispute application with Douyin and temporarily suspended its operation.

2.LDL adopts the "fearless call-up" competition mode

After last year's clean-up, this summer LDL and had fake matches again. In order to better regulate the professional league and avoid manipulation, LDL decided to implement a new competition mode “Fearless Calling.”

html On July 14, the LDL Development League issued an announcement announcing that starting from the second round-robin of the summer season, the game will adopt the "Fearless Recruitment" mode. The heroes selected by each team in each game cannot be the same as the previous game. That is to say, in the first game, team 1 uses male gun , and in the second game the male gun is banned by default, and so on.

This mode has been used in the neighboring King of Glory for a long time. The purpose is to improve the viewing experience of the game, but there are many heroes in the King of Glory, and League of Legends There are only a few players who can play in each position in each season. Plus In the five ban positions, when BO3 is played, each team will have to ban 15 heroes. Doesn't this increase the BP workload of the coaching staff and test the players' hero pool?

The audience thinks that there is no problem with LDL implementing the new model, as long as it does not rise to LPL. On the one hand, players of King of Glory and League of Legends often exchange fire, and now the new model is that the king comes first and League of Legends adopts it later. It is inevitable that there will be Being criticized for plagiarism. On the other hand, they are afraid that the game will be full of BO3 and BO5, and both sides will have no heroes to win, creating a strange lineup and reducing the quality of the decisive game.

3.LCK: It is not true that the referee stood by and did nothing to punish the BUG.

Yesterday, in the third game between T1 and HLE, a bug appeared in the punishment of Oner player. At that time, Oner responded to the referee, but the referee did not deal with it accordingly. When the game progressed, After a certain period of time, a player initiated a timeout, and the LCK went back in time and space to restart the third game.

This incident aroused heated discussion among LCK viewers. Some netizens felt that Oner maliciously used the punishment bug to destroy the balance of the game. Some netizens read the INS clarification posted by Oner and believed that all the blame lies with the LCK referee. If the referee dealt with it earlier, it would be No time-traveling occurs.

Today, LCK related people responded to the referee’s judgment in this incident. Relevant sources said: It is not true that the referee stood aside and did nothing to punish the BUG. Before the Oner player raised the BUG, ​​the referee team had already discussed the relevant BUG due to the question raised by the HLE side. It is operationally difficult to unconditionally interrupt the game before it is clear whether the BUG exists.

There seems to be no problem with this explanation. In fact, the referee only paid attention to the problem of HLE's reaction and ignored Oner's feedback. After all, there was a problem with the Hero Punishment controlled by Oner. He knows the bug better than anyone else. This also shows that the LCK referee is in There is a lack of professionalism, and LCK is also correcting this part, stating that it will improve the game operation rule manual and enhance professionalism.