一. Sima Nan calls on Jack Ma to return
People's Daily once said: "There is no era of Jack Ma, only Jack Ma of the era" . I think this is the most objective and reasonable positioning of Jack Ma.
Recently, Sima Nan called on Jack Ma to come back in his program. He said that Jack Ma, as a famous private economy entrepreneur in China, should come back to make suggestions for China's economic recovery instead of hiding in Japan to live happily. At the same time, he also claimed that this is a responsibility and obligation for Jack Ma, which is quite a bit of moral kidnapping .
Let’s not say whether Jack Ma will come back. Even if he comes back, what can he do? After all, times have changed, and the glory that once belonged to him has become a thing of the past. Since the failure of Ant Financial to go public, Jack Ma has been quite disheartened and finally chose to retire. Now he and his family have settled in Japan, which is not the best choice for him.
If something bad happens again if he comes back this time, it is still unclear whether he can escape unscathed again. So I say that Teacher Sima Nan is not a party involved, so don't make decisions for others. Just like the old saying goes, "Don't persuade others to be good if they don't face difficulties." For now, you should take good care of yourself and think of other ways.
But from now on, Teacher Sima Nan seems to be unable to think of any other way. This is the same as . He was once called, He knows astronomy and geography below, and he has three teachings and nine streams. , the evaluation of Five Elements and Eight Works is obviously not consistent.
Although I am dissatisfied with Sima Nan’s proposal to bring back Jack Ma, I still agree with his view that private enterprises are an important driving force for economic recovery
2. On the people. The importance of the private economy in recovering the economy
But in reality, although everyone talks about attaching importance to the private economy, it is not uncommon to treat the private economy differently or even discriminate against it. For example, financial institutions set far more conditions for the loan needs of private enterprises than state-owned enterprises. Therefore, during this epidemic, many small and medium-sized private enterprises had to choose to close down due to the break in their capital chain but unable to obtain loans from banks. It can be said that the private economy has suffered unprecedented trauma.
If during next year's economic recovery, the restoration of the private economy is not listed as a key support object, but only through the return of real estate to attract investment or stimulate domestic demand to expand mass consumption, I I think it is not feasible, because real estate cannot fundamentally solve the employment problem of the masses, , and the absence of good jobs means that there is no way to increase income. Just imagine that everyone is worried about life. Even if there is domestic demand, how can we expect everyone to expand consumption?
I think some people within the system simply do not understand the hardships of people outside the system , especially during the epidemic lockdown period, how many people were locked at home and unable to work, resulting in their income being interrupted. But those within the system are not affected by this, and their wages are paid every cent, and even various additional epidemic subsidies are provided. The only thing we ordinary people can hope for is that the economy can recover as soon as possible so that we can slowly get out of the current hard days. And the most critical part of this is whether the private economy can succeed To recovery?
A large number of facts show that the private economy can not only play a huge role in promoting social employment and improving people's livelihood, but also play a pioneering role in driving national industrial upgrading and technological progress. For example, private technological innovation enterprises such as Huawei, Djiang, BYD, don't they lead the trend of China's scientific and technological progress?
It is said that manufacturing is the cornerstone of the rise of great countries. Even technologically powerful countries such as the United States have begun to pay attention to manufacturing again, and the rise of manufacturing is not driven by these private economies. Putin once said that a nation that relies on the real estate industry as the backbone of its national economy has no future. So what do you think about this? Let’s share your views together.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-