Text/Dingfengbo Lihaitian Flavor Industry issues another statement denied the "double standards". A friend asked me, what do you think? I said, my opinion first emphasizes that it is immature and unprofessional. But I plan to tell you a real feeling. Whether it is a star or a com

text/Dingfengboli

Haitian Flavor Industry issues another statement denied the "double standards". A friend asked me, what do you think?

I said, my opinion first emphasizes that it is immature and unprofessional. But I plan to tell you a real feeling.

Whether it is a star or a company's statement, its credibility and public effectiveness are essentially after Li Yifeng's statement was hacked. People have become accustomed to these dry statements . It is unknown whether Haitian Flavor Industry's statement can achieve obvious results.

Statement

summarizes the statement of Xiahaitian Flavor Industry, which mainly expresses that some people attempt to use food additives to mislead consumers and make consumers think that Chinese food is worse than foreign food; they attempt to use the so-called "double standards" to provoke conflicts between consumers and Chinese brand enterprises. How do you view

?

It should be said that Haitian Flavor Industry's statement did not provide evidence, nor did it indicate that it would use legal weapons to sue. A statement like is dry and sensational, and may also give people a very high impression of self-esteem. To be honest, I am not optimistic about whether

can stop the boiling public opinion.

Perhaps that's exactly what it is. Based on personal observations, whether it is the Haitian Soy Sauce Live Room or the online message about the Haitian Flavor Industry's re-issue of another statement, it can be seen that people have many questions and confusions.

In other words. When people take something seriously, whether a dry statement can be effective does not depend on how sensational and pleasant the statement is. But it depends on the past history and credibility of this company.

The current doubts about Haitian Soy Sauce on the Internet are summarized as follows:

(1) What is the matter of changing the tag overnight?

(2) Please explain why the ingredients lists in China and abroad are different?

(3) Haitian As the drafter of the standard for setting Chinese soy sauce, is there a problem of too low standards? Does the opinions of netizens make sense? Do you need a positive and specific response? I will not make any comments.

However, in addition to thinking that the dry statement may not dispel public doubts, it will even have a counterproductive effect. I also have a few opinions on this statement.

1 Why is Xinjifei clearly named many chaos or problems in the food industry, but the public opinion of Haitian Soy Sauce continues to ferment and heat up? This question is worth thinking about.

Second, can Haitian represent Chinese food and Chinese brand enterprises? Personally, I don't think so. The 5 examples of html represent the whole, and often exist to generalize from a partial perspective. This is not recommended. This also reminds me of Lenovo , which was also deeply trapped in the vortex of public opinion last year. It should be said that the operations of the two are too similar. The former represents Chinese brands and Chinese food, while the latter represents national enterprises and private enterprises. But I want to ask the next question, can we be more low-key and more practical, you represent yourself, can you? Can it be said that as the drafter of the Chinese soy sauce standard, it can represent all Chinese food and Chinese brands?

Then why are there other brands of soy sauce not caught in this problem?

3. Does Haitian Flavor Industry only declare to prove that it has no problems? Is there no other way to prove yourself? Obviously not.

Whether it is the double standard issue of domestic and foreign ingredients lists or food additives, there are some methods to prove it. For example, the live broadcast displays the ingredients list of foreign Haitian soy sauce, such as taking legal means. Are these more powerful than dry statements?

Netizens have many questions. I also have many questions. But this question is sensitive and non-professional, just click to stop.

Finally, I would like to emphasize: I will no longer issue dry statements. Can I not always use my own beliefs to represent all Chinese brands and Chinese food?

In addition, in the face of Xin Jifei and netizens' doubts, I believe that if I can judge the facts and show tangible evidence, it will be much more useful than the so-called statement.

What do you think about this?