Picture: Taiwan's 3 vice presidential candidates Xu Xinying, Wang Ruxuan, and Chen Jianren (from left) attended the first TV debate held on Sanli TV on the afternoon of the 26th/Central News Agency
Dagong.com, December 27th, Taiwan general election debate on the 26th In the afternoon, the first show was staged, with three vice "presidential" candidates Wang Ruxuan, Chen Jianren and Xu Xinying taking the lead. Compared with Zhu Lilun and Tsai Ing-wen's intense debate on cross-strait and economic issues in the political conference on the 25th, the deputies' debate this time was slightly less sparkly and the topics were relatively scattered. However, the trio’s questions and answers mostly involved youth issues such as low labor wages, education reforms, housing, etc., and even mentioned new-generation terms such as well-known dramas and princesses in an attempt to grab votes from the young people.
According to China News Agency and China Central News Agency: Taiwan’s Vice Presidential Candidate’s TV Debate was held at Sanli TV Station at 2 pm on the 26th. There was only one debate. The format of the debate was commentary, 6 questions from citizens, cross-examination and conclusion, and 3 people. The order of the candidates’ speeches was Xu Xinying, the deputy “presidential” candidate of the People First Party, Wang Ruxuan, the deputy “presidential” candidate of the KMT, and Chen Jianren, the deputy “presidential” candidate of the DPP. However, the three people hardly focused on issues such as cross-strait, foreign trade, and energy, focusing on issues such as low wages and housing for young people. Xu Xinying, who was on the debate stage for the first time at
, could not hide her tension. She said that when she visited the grassroots, she found that the people's voice was "sorrow, sorrow, sorrow, misery, and absolute". Except for corporate worries about not making money, salaried employees were not about getting retirement In addition to the money, there are also problems such as the decline in youth salaries and the inability to buy houses. In order to improve the economy and the dilemma of low wages, she advocated that the government must actively support the industry. After the economy becomes more active, it is expected that salary increases will be driven. Xu Xinying also proposed to build public housing to let young people live at ease.
Wang denounced green exclusivity, regardless of black and white, while Wang Ruxuan made good use of his expertise to attack women, maternal and child policies. When talking about labor, Wang Ruxuan said that he was not a "rich second generation" or "second generation of officials", but a "second generation of labor." ; Because I came from a working family, I can better understand the injustices that workers have encountered in society. Wang Ruxuan also compared the differences between the two parties, saying that the DPP is very exclusive. As long as it is her own, she can stand through it regardless of black and white. What she feels in the KMT is tolerance and urges everyone to give the KMT another chance. Wang Ruxuan also took the initiative to mention the military house case and walked off the stage to bow and apologize. Chen Jianren, who was the last speaker at
, proposed five innovative R&D programs for employment, which will allow Taiwan to increase its advantages in international competition, create job opportunities, and propose a youth entrepreneurship assistance program. As for the education reform, Chen Jianren said that the gap between learning and use should be greatly increased, the skills required for employment should be cultivated, and the experience of industry professionals in the academic world should be strengthened.
Chen approved the government to make housing prices soar.
Chen Jianren severely criticized the Malaysian government to make housing prices soar. He proposed to build 200,000 residential houses that only rent but not sell, so that young people studying abroad and newly married can afford to buy houses and implement housing justice. At the conclusion of the conclusion, Chen Jianren played the perceptual card, using his father and wife's family story to emphasize unity, calling for an end to political violence and making Taiwan better together.
It is worth noting that the “22K program” (a monthly salary program of NT$22,000 for workplace internships for college graduates) introduced by the government in the past in the debate has also become the focus of the debate. Chen Jianren and Xu Xinying separately questioned Wang Ruxuan’s 22K system as a cause of youth Low salary problem. Wang Ruxuan said that 22K is definitely too low and the government should use policy tools to improve the situation. She also emphasized that "someone deliberately associates my name with 22K", but she clarified that the 22K policy is not her plan, it is a policy of the Ministry of Education.
More than the "King of Langya Ranking"
In order to solve the problem of low wages for young people, Wang Ruxuan throws out Zhu Lilun's previous policy of "salary improvement", which increases the amount of human capital and turns "talents" into "people" "Finance", companies help students pay tuition expenses can be tax deductible, with 150% for tax returns, complete the functional supervision standards, and expand vocational training institutions and colleges to join the "salary" college, just enter the "salary" college For the students, the guaranteed monthly salary starts from NT$40,000. Z3z
also appeared many times in the debate. For example, Xu Xinying compared herself to the "King Jing" in the popular TV series "Langya Bang", not very good at talking but doing things so that the people can live a good life; Wang Ruxuan is at the conclusion Said that he had never been a "princess" in his life.
Xu Stiff Wang Sensual Chen Tension
z49Photo of z
: Wang Ruxuan answers questions from the media at the press conference after the debate/Central News Agency
The vice presidential candidate debate held on the 26th, scholars believe that the brilliance is not enough. Chen Jianren looked nervous when he read the manuscript. Xu Xinying answered the question, her body movements were stiff.
had less excitement than the script.
commented on the overall debate. NTU’s Journalism Research Institute Director Wang Taili said “disappointed.” Three people read more manuscripts that day, and they also used the script to announce the performance. According to Wang Taili, Director of the Journalism Research Institute of National Taiwan University, Xu Xinying compares herself with the mainland TV series "Langya List". During the defense, there was no positive response to the question, and sometimes he did not respond on the grounds that the question had no logic. In addition, no matter what the problem is, it is frequently emphasized that "choosing the right person (Soong Chuyu) is the most important."
As for Wang Ruxuan, Wang Taili analyzed that the military house dispute has come to an end, but in the debate they constantly mentioned that it was the point of "losing points." Xu Xinying and Chen Jianren commented on the policies of the KMT, but Wang Ruxuan did not defend Zhu Lilun and the policies of the KMT. However, compared with the other two candidates in her own capacity, she created emotions and aggrieved feelings.
Chen Jianren seems nervous to create a warm male image, but he has issues that face the concerns of young people nowadays, and he can answer questions from netizens truthfully.
Qiu Shiyi, associate professor of the Department of Political Science of Donghai University, believes that Wang Ruxuan is more exaggerating, too emotional and dramatic. Chen Jianren looked at the manuscript frequently, did not look directly at the camera, and seemed boring and boring. Xu Xinying's thinking is peculiar, and it can be seen from the debate that Xu Xinying is not familiar with James Soong's policies.
Xia Xueli, a professor at the Performing Arts Institute of Taiwan Normal University, said that although Chen Jianren showed the most smiles in the debate, his body language was relatively rigid. "Chen is the left-handed one-armed swordsman," and there is always only one gesture. On the whole, Wang Ruxuan feels "smart", and this debate often has emotional performances, but he reads the manuscript too frequently, which affects his sincerity. Xu Xinying is the only one who does not read the manuscript frequently, but her body movements are not well coordinated, which affects her persuasiveness.
Xu Mismatch Wang Qingshuang Chen Laocheng
Picture: Chen Jianren (left) and his wife Luo Fengping attended the TV debate/Central News Agency
The vice presidential candidate debate held on the 26th, the clothing of the three candidates also became the focus of attention, the fashion designer Lin Guoji commented on Xu Xinying, the deputy "presidential" candidate of the People First Party, whose suit jacket was too large, affecting professional image; the KMT vice "presidential" candidate Wang Ruxuan's suit was fresh and close to the public; DPP vice "presidential" candidate Chen Jianren wore a regular and image Mature.
The three candidates performed differently. Lin Guoji said that Xu Xinying's suit jacket was too large with a yellow high collar inside, which did not add any points to the image and was not suitable for wearing in the debate.
Wang Ruxuan is the most suitable of the three. She wore an off-white suit and made her debut on stage. She changed her past simple image and looked ready and aggressive. Lin Guoji pointed out that Wang Ruxuan's suit was tailored to fit, and the light brown suit was refreshing and close to the image of young people. However, Wang Ruxuan is recommended to wear dark, rounded frames to modify his face.
Chen Jianren is well dressed and stable. Lin Guoji believes that he is a bit like a university professor and business owner. The overall clothing has no major drawbacks, but compared with the previous image, he can change the frame to modify the eye bags.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-