text/Yin Susu
Recently, a hot search entry of "Zhou Zhennan's plagiarism" caused heated discussion.
After being accused of plagiarizing Bewhy, Zhou Zhennan once again fell into a "plagiarism" storm. The cause of the incident has to start with Zhou Zhennan's new album.
Zhou Zhennan released a new song, but he was accused of plagiarizing
as an original musician. Zhou Zhennan released his new album not long ago, but it was not applause but curse that followed.
A fan of a member of the WINNER group picked up the soundtrack of Zhou Zhennan's new album "Love" in the dynamic, and compared it with a single released by the WINNER group in 2018.
It is not difficult to hear from the video posted by the fan that the preludes of the two songs are indeed very similar, which seems to be to safeguard the rights and interests of the idol, so although the follow-up work has not been completed, the fan posted a dynamic saying that Zhou Zhennan’s new release The original works are not completed independently, but have elements that borrow from WINNER's combined singles. As soon as the news of
came out, Zhou Zhennan's fans were also very dissatisfied. After all, the nature of "plagiarism" is indeed a bit bad. For an independent musician, plagiarism is undoubtedly the final bottom line.
So although Zhou Zhennan is accused of plagiarizing WINNER, it is really too sloppy to characterize a work as "plagiarism" based on "sounds like". In order to further clarify the "plagiarism" controversy and to protect the works of his idol, Zhou Zhennan's fans also picked up scores in the shortest time and invited more professional musicians to evaluate. Z1z
Zhou Zhennan's clarifications issued by fans are concise and concise, not only showing the scores of the two songs, but also analyzing the scores in detail.
From a professional point of view, the similarity of the scores of the two songs is not high, neither the structure nor the rhythm is similar, so naturally there is no plagiarism. Some highly authoritative musicians of
also voiced this matter, directly saying: "There is no plagiarism in "Love"." With the clarification of fans and the support of authoritative figures in the industry, Zhou Zhennan can be regarded as unjustified.
simply "sounds like" that the other party has plagiarized, and WINNER's fans are indeed not rational.
Zhou Zhennan was labeled "plagiarism" again this time, which seems to be related to his previous suspected plagiarism of Bewhy, so everyone will have a preconceived stereotype of him.
The situation reversed and Han fans were mocked for "The Origin of the Universe"
After Zhou Zhennan's fans released a clarification, the situation began to reverse. At first, fans who thought Zhou Zhennan had copied WINNER had also cleared all their own dynamics, and at the same time, they caused Zhou Zhennan's own cause. Sorry for the negative impact.
rashly questioned that plagiarism by others is indeed bad behavior, and this fan should also be responsible for his actions.
As the situation reversed, the public opinion related to this matter also turned around 180 degrees. WINNER fans questioned Zhou Zhennan’s plagiarism, and even some netizens directly used "the origin of the Korean fan universe" to mock WINNER fans. His personal behavior rose to the entire group, and Han Fan’s wind commentary was once again in crisis.
Many netizens believe that Korean fans have repeatedly labeled domestic independent creators "plagiarism", which will only make the Chinese music scene worse, and it will be more difficult for many domestic musicians to find their own on the difficult road of development. Way out. Compared with the well-known KPOP, there are still many obstacles to the future development of Chinese pop music.
Because of this, some netizens are dissatisfied with the behavior of fans forcing the label of "plagiarism" without showing evidence.
Plagiarism prevails, where is the way out for originality?
In fact, there are indeed many singers in China who have been plagiarized, and many variety shows are also copied from Korean variety.
has not done a good job in protecting originality and combating plagiarism. It is also because of plagiarism incidents that everybody's evaluation of domestic variety shows and songs has dropped.
For a work, one of the most important evaluation criteria should be the originality of the work.
Protecting the interests of original creators is the best way to maintain the domestic original atmosphere, and it is also the best way for many people to take off the colored glasses "domestic originality equals plagiarism". The reason why the development space of the Chinese music scene is getting narrower and the variety show model is becoming more routine is because the domestic market does not encourage originality enough.
The authors and investors of some plagiarized works have made a lot of money and even won awards. However, the original creators have been plagiarized, but they cannot find a way to appeal, and even bear infamy.
In this way, those who are unable to live a basic life on original works either choose to go with the plagiarism, or choose to give up creating and engage in other industries.
In this way, there will only be fewer and fewer domestic original creators. The plagiarism of
has long been common in China, and discussions on this topic have also been controversial.
But I still hope that more and more people can devote themselves to original music, and use their own abilities and wisdom to wash away everyone's stereotype of "domestic plagiarism".
