announced its entry into the platform at the end of November and started live broadcast. By December 3, Fang Qingping was a guest at the "Da Jiao Football" chat gown. Mr. Jiang Kun has not updated the updates for five days.
has settled in the interruption. In just four days, where has Mr. Jiang been? Is it because I am too busy with work, or is it because I can’t bear to give up?
The reason was that Mr. Jiang did not say, and there was no relevant information on the Internet. Even the Jiang Zhong fan who praised Jiang Kun for joining the Internet as "a bird entering the forest" did not talk about this. I thought he was quite familiar with Mr. Jiang, but now it seems that this is not the case.
and those people who seem to care about Mr. Jiang on weekdays have no questions about this matter. Their performance is simply too cold and disheartening.
So I have said a long time ago that their usual praise and support for Jiang Kun is just to open and close the upper lip and lower lip. Their real purpose is to borrow Mr. Jiang's name and vent their indescribable personal anger towards people and things that are not in line with their own minds.
In the past two years, I have never counted how many articles I have written about the crosstalk circle. What I care more about is whether my opinion has been affirmed by most people, because the eyes of the masses are sharp and most people think it is right, that is right.
online discussion. Anyone can participate as long as they are interested and have the opportunity to speak. The key is whether it has a point of view and attitude. Whether the opinions are conscience-oriented, whether the attitude is objective, and whether the basis has been verified by multiple parties are the main factors that can be recognized by the majority.
Say the master Ma Sanli , Master Hou Baolin , what is the wonderful crosstalk of crosstalk? We are not professionals and cannot comment in professional terms, but the basic things should still be said.
A while ago, someone wrote a 100-word short essay, praising Mr. Jiang Kun's good crosstalk, based on the fact that he does not stutter, does not stutter, and does not say the wrong words. It also said that when Mr. Jiang’s crosstalk was played, there would be no people. There is another one in
who wrote two thousand words, compared Mr. Jiang and Mr. Guo's penis, and finally came to the conclusion that Jiang Kun's penis is much better than Guo Degang's . What are the comments on these two articles:
? I don’t have to say more, you can think of it, right? Well, exactly the same as you think. Then why is this happening? The reason is that the first article is purely about not understanding crosstalk but not working hard to understand, but insisting on talking about crosstalk. The second article is that before writing, neither washing hands nor purifying the heart, nor purifying the hands or heart, and the things written naturally ignore the facts and are difficult to convince the public.
For arguments, I think we need to look at them with a dialectical perspective. If you only look at one side of anything, it must be bland and boring. The same is true for crosstalk. If no one argues that day, it will become a legacy.
debate is just a process, and removing the false and retaining the true is the goal. From arguing to verifying right and wrong through practice, yes continue, and wrong correcting wrong, this is why debate can promote the development and progress of things.
We told a doll that something cannot be eaten, it is smelly. But the baby doesn't understand, and he cries and makes a fuss to eat. Later he went to eat, but he ended up crying. He didn't eat it next time he asked him to eat it.
The noisy process is argument. If you cry, you will practice. If you never eat it again, you will make progress.
A few decades ago, I listened to crosstalk on the radio. No one told us that there are so many things to pay attention to crosstalk. Anyway, I just need to know that this thing can make people happy and relieve the worries of life, even if it is only ten or eight minutes.
This is actually the meaning of crosstalk and its greatest value.
The era is changing. Nowadays, most people’s food, clothing, housing and transportation are no longer a problem, but people’s desire and demand for laughter have not faded at all.
The Spring Festival Gala used to be very good because it is a veritable "gala". Chen Peisi became popular, Zhao Benshan became popular, Guo Degang became popular, and the "Coffee Cleaning Mouth" and many sketch actors such as Xiao Shenyang also became popular.
Why do they become popular? Because it can bring laughter to everyone.
Think carefully, everyone who makes it the top priority to bring laughter to the audience is recognized. Even if some of them have retired, their names and works are still nostalgic for people.
On the contrary, why has the Spring Festival Gala been criticized in recent years? Why no one likes the crosstalk and sketches on the big stage?
Personally, I think that the Spring Festival Gala is not liked today because it no longer has the flavor of "gala". The sketch is not liked because it has entered a fixed mode of playing ugly and sensational. No one likes crosstalk because they have too many additional conditions such as educational significance.
Of course, everything is not absolute. Take "formula crosstalk" as an example. There are still people who love it. According to Li Hongye , an alumnus once said, "Da Li, you have to persevere. Without your crosstalk, I will not be able to survive."
The so-called objective is actually relatively objective. That is to say, even if we have tried our best, in the eyes of some people, and are still subjective.
Everyone will involuntarily take the individual as the central point and will think that their cognition is correct. This is a normal human nature and a problem that humans can never solve.
For the new crosstalk advocated by Mr. Jiang Kun, I think after Feng Gong Niu Qun and Liu Wei and other crosstalk actors, they have actually come to an end and cannot make any breakthroughs. But it is obvious that many people, including Jiang Kun, do not admit it, or are unwilling to admit it. But in fact, the new crosstalk is indeed unable to develop, at least there is no targeted stage. The "North and South Comedy Joy" has shown that from ticket sales to ticket increase, from big fanfare to a sad ending.
As a non-professional person, I know that I do not have the ability to conduct a deeper analysis of the current situation of crosstalk, so I can only give a simple view:
In my opinion, because the threshold for some famous crosstalk masters to accept disciples is too low, the number of people who are just filling in the numbers is rampant; blind innovation has led to the popularity of "four-no-like" crosstalk; because crosstalk must have "educational significance" and "smiling with tears", the space for crosstalk creation and performance has been severely compressed; some practitioners have awe-freedom to blindly regard tradition as dross... These are important reasons for crosstalk to enter a dead end.
In an interview with a certain media, Mr. Jiang Kun once said that if you don’t take a step forward, you can only stand still.
is right, but the truth is the truth after all, and only by putting it into practice can its significance be reflected. My personal opinion is that progress requires many factors to be facilitated, while tolerance is a very important one.
cannot be said, that life cannot be done, this is indecent, then it is too vulgar, it is not good to say that peers are not good, the audience is not good, or the supporting actor is not good, only "laughing fruit" is not good, and only funny is not good, no educational significance is not good.
regards a folk art form as a heavy-duty car with eighty wheels, and wishes to let it pull the spark of human civilization to ignite the entire universe. Can it bear it? What else can we talk about moving forward? If we can move forward, we will really see Li Huiniang in broad daylight.
This is by no means a young man is talking nonsense. Do you still remember the famous gentleman host? When he said seriously and righteously, "The older generation of crosstalk masters and artists have used their whole life to move crosstalk into the temple, while some crosstalk actors have pulled it back to the street stall overnight." This statement was made by Mr. Shengjie, a teacher of , who was a guest, refused to comment on this statement. When Mr. Jiang let out the "gift and give" laughter, the reason for the decline of crosstalk was found.
If I say this, it will definitely attract different opinions. I welcome the real argument.
A friend left a message today. I read it very seriously. Although I had different opinions, I respected him very much. I read his comments several times and replied seriously.
On the Internet, not many people can discuss issues with the attitude of dealing with the facts. There are a few people who, except for posting rumors everywhere like small advertisements, would just give you a few bones to the old young man.
It's really what kind of animal cares about what food? I thought to myself. When he said the word "bone", his eyes must have a green light, and saliva flowed on his long tongue. I don't care about this kind of thing, and I advise you to try not to mess with it, because this guy is too protective of food and is really biting it.
In short, to comment on some phenomena, you must first do your homework, try your best to understand and explore, and judge things with a relatively objective attitude. This is a responsibility to yourself and respect for everyone. Only by doing this can you be recognized. If you believe that most people still like to be reasonable, they can distinguish right from wrong.
From the moment he was energetic when he started live broadcast on the platform to the quiet and restless interruption, some people said that Mr. Jiang Kun encountered a cyber violence, and these were all done by the steel wires.
I don’t know what basis they say so, so I can only use myself as an example to talk about this issue. I only watched Mr. Jiang’s live broadcast for five minutes because he was talking about football, and I am not a real fan. I always see the World Cup indiscriminately. Because I had no idea about the topic, I only went in and took a look, and left without saying a word. I believe there are many people like me.
Why did Jiang Kun stop live broadcast? The real reason is probably only known by himself. However, according to relevant information, the Qu Association will usher in a new term election this month. As Jiang Kun, who is over 70 years old and has been in charge of the Qu Association for ten years, may also retire gloriously. Such a big event is much more important than live broadcast.
This is probably the main reason why Mr. Jiang stopped updating.
