mentions Korean War movies, what do you think of? It is Wu Jing and Yi Yang Qianxi starring in "Shuimen Bridge" and " Changjin Lake ", and it is also Zhang Yimou directed by " Sniper ". It has to be said that although these two movies have some problems, they are still very good war movies in the end. However, putting aside these movies, there is also a Korean War movie in recent years, but it has been criticized by netizens, and this Korean War movie is "King Kongchuan".
This movie has even been criticized by netizens as a public-known movie. It’s strange, why does a movie still cause so many people to complain? You know, no matter what, this is also a rare Korean War movie. After all, there are very few domestic theater war movies. A few years ago, a movie " Red Sea Operation " was released to make the audience happy, not to mention that the historical science fiction film " Eight Hundred " of Guanhu can all get a lot of box office. So why has this movie become a public-known movie?
is actually very simple, that is, it seriously vilified the image of our army. What did the volunteer army rely on to push the US military back to 38th parallel ? It relies on strong fighting will and intelligent combat skills. However, in this movie, I'm sorry, this movie turned such a plot into a quagmire. The volunteers rely on brainlessness and the opposite side. Take the air defense position in the play for example. Generally, the anti-aircraft cannon will change the place after it is finished, but in this movie, it will not change the place.
And they received a task to protect the bridge, which was the main task. As a result, afterwards, everyone completely forgot the task of guarding the bridge. The platoon leader of the artillery platoon in the play, Zhang Yi, played by in the play, actually exposed his coordinates at the end and attracted those fighter planes to come. This is no different from openly treason. We carefully check the information and we will know that the Volunteer Bridge was passed by cars at that time, and the soldiers climbed over through ropes. After all, US planes would not dive down and specifically deal with soldiers on the cableway. That was simply a person seeking death.
The most important thing is that this movie can't forget the traditional nature of Hollywood , that is anti-war. However, their anti-war is on the Americans, and we have become the side that provoked the war. The play constantly emphasizes the inconvenience of the US military, especially in the end, the US military was moved by our spirit and let go of the Volunteer Army. It was simply nonsense. In fact, the US military was beaten by the Volunteer Army to doubt his life, so she sat down to negotiate with us. If they got a happy day on the battlefield, they would not talk to you at all.
Secondly, it is to ignore the collectivist spirit of our army. In the play, Wu Jing and Zhang Yi's air defense position in charge of defense fully exert personal heroism. There is also Liu Hao, the scene where he used the submachine gun to in the play, which is even more unorganized. You must know that the fighter pilots of the US military have all been baptized by World War II . Their experience is not bad. With this little flame, the coordinates of the bridge can be directly exposed and even caused secondary damage. But the movie ignores such things and blindly discredits the image of our army.
However, I was curious about why the movie was sitting in a crooked manner. Later, I looked at the cast and crew list of this movie and found that the director and screenwriter of this movie were Guan Hu, so it was not surprising.
