Comrades, things have developed now and have entered a new stage. Originally, we thought that Chengdu TV Station only authorized it to one company, and everyone’s focus was on this Youshu company.

, things have developed now and have entered a new stage. Originally, we thought that Chengdu TV Station only authorized it to one company, and everyone’s focus was on this Youshu company. But then two more licensing contracts were revealed.

" Tan Tan Traffic " has long been subcontracted by them.

The first authorization letter:

A certain TV station transferred the copyright property rights of the audio-visual works in the "Tan Tan Traffic" section to You Shu.

The second authorization letter:

Youshu transferred rights protection matters to Meizi Culture,

The third authorization letter:

Meizi Culture transferred it to Xiyan.

Afterwards, I discovered that this so-called girl culture and analysis are probably all leather bag company .

Netizens conducted an on-the-spot investigation

What do we think about the current problems?

1. Why do they subcontract layer by layer?

Obviously, in order to confuse the public, the legal team prepared by Officer Tan did not know who to sue. These three companies are actually white gloves. can see that they have been planning for a long time and have woven this network long ago, and then they enveloped Officer Tan and went up.

Having one more company to defend rights will consume more time and energy than before, whether in legal proceedings or in other aspects, because there are more parties to the litigation.

Moreover, these three companies and Chengdu TV can be said to be a community of interests for , attracting more people to join , and also adding legal power to their so-called claims.

2. Is Chengdu TV station suspected of making malicious claims? Malicious tendering and damage to state-owned assets.

one by one.

maliciously claims :

This second-generation program has become popular two years ago. According to online retrieval, Tan Qiao Traffic has become popular on the entire network as early as 2020. Then why didn’t Chengdu TV issue a statement at this time? ? Why don't you say it? Second creations are not allowed, now they can't say they didn't see it! They actually waited for more than a year to lay out the plan, especially in 2021, after Officer Tan resigned from public office, they started the copyright transfer in just two months. With a mentality like , there is no need to guess at all. Especially in today's Internet age, it is completely false to say, ah, I didn't realize it in the early stage, but I realized it in the later stage.

A hot spot, a hot search, popular all over the Internet, I don’t believe that the relevant stakeholders don’t know, but they are waiting for you to create more and more, and finally, waiting to cut the leek .

Malicious bidding:

Chengdu TV station, if you want to protect your rights, why should you authorize it to a leather bag company? Have you gone through the procedure? Take the so-called Youshu Company, a company just established in 2018. Its main business is nothing. It subscribed for 500,000, but actually didn’t pay a dime. How did they get ? This kind of authorization letter must give a clear answer . And the two so-called companies later.

Damage to state-owned property:

How did Chengdu TV damage state-owned property?

1. If nothing else, then this brand stinks.

2. Does the authorization letter involve illegal bidding?

requires that the minutes of the meeting be made public, and positive answers must be given especially when it comes to the distribution of benefits.

Why can a leather bag company get 65% of the profits?

This is obviously an illegal authorization. The TV station is not the party that makes the biggest profit, since it is not the biggest party.

Why should they authorize a leather bag company instead of going directly to a law firm and going through formal channels to protect their own rights and interests? Instead, they have to go through a dispensable so-called company to take this step? can be said to be problematic at every step.

3. What happened to Tan Tan’s traffic in the first place?

"Tan Talks about Traffic" is a traffic safety education program led by Chengdu Public Security Bureau and participated by Chengdu TV Station. Tan Qiao appears as the host. The TV station only follows the filming and is responsible for post-production.

Police Officer Tan said:

"The purpose of the program at that time was to widely and interestingly promote traffic safety knowledge, so I did not make any agreement with the TV station, neither verbally nor written."

The Road Traffic Safety Law began in 2004 In Tan Qiao's view, the popularization of the law at that time was very important. He himself had not studied the Copyright Law, and at that time, no one defined the copyright issue of this program.

4.What exactly is copyright?

Some netizens pointed out that Chengdu TV did not participate in the production of the script content at all, and the copyright should belong to the creator. . Although the author did not claim the copyright, although you participated in the post-production and enjoyed priority use rights, there were no restrictions on others. person’s right to use.

Comrades, in fact, we have long been able to see that the matryoshka-like authorization of is the greatest malice against individuals. There are three companies that waste time and energy on you to force you to compromise. This is also the reason why we ordinary people do not want to get into lawsuits. Later legal procedures must speed up the trial. The law should play the role of protecting vulnerable groups. Everyone is equal before the law, but everyone's economic level is not equal.

Finally, I quote the words written by netizens to end this article.

"It's clear that I want to bully you, but you can't do anything about me. If I slap you, you have to give me money. This kind of evil is often the most vicious and despicable."

Alas, in life, interests are Whatever you do by forcing people to do it, do it and cherish it, and support Officer Tan.

#Tan Qiaoshai Authorization Letter: Tan Tan Traffic was subcontracted at all levels#​# sued Tan Qiao for infringement. The company sued 61 times in one month#​#Tan Qiao responded that Tan Tan Traffic was completely removed from the shelves#