In the past few days, in the intensive interviews with the media, some Hong Kong stars talked about the weight of the word "China" in front of the camera. They all recalled that before 1997, when filling out the nationality form when leaving the country, the nationality column wa

The problem of identity recognition is actually a problem of belonging. During the intensive interviews with the media these days, when some Hong Kong stars talked about the weight of the word "China" in front of the camera, they all without exception recalled the nationality column when filling out forms when leaving the country before 1997. Blank experience. Among them are Wen Zhaolun , Eric Tsang , and the famous Hong Kong principal.

happened to come across a scene from Wen Zhaolun’s previous interview, where he talked about similar experiences, with some differences. When I heard him say, "They said that Hong Kong is a colony, not a country...", I suddenly realized something. Reminiscent of the turmoil caused by Western media more than half a month ago when the new version of Hong Kong textbooks deleted the statement that Hong Kong was a British colony, it makes people feel that this is indeed a problem.

In the education received by Wen Zhaolun's generation, they must have been instilled with the concept that Hong Kong is a British colony. Even in recent years, many textbooks in Hong Kong still state this. It can be seen from Wen Zhaolun's interview video that he is not too wary of the statement "Hong Kong is a British colony". He just feels that there is no country to fill people's hearts with. What are the facts about

? Hong Kong has never been a British colony. According to our explanation, the United Kingdom only has the right to govern. The governments after the Qing Dynasty have never recognized British sovereignty over Hong Kong. Britain's propaganda that Hong Kong is its colony is, at best, playing word games; at worst, it has bad intentions, confuses the public, and deliberately creates "facts."

Therefore, whether Hong Kong is a British colony is not a word-picking issue, but a political issue of right and wrong.

The hour hand goes back to December 14, 1960. The United Nations General Assembly passed Resolution 1514, "Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples," which gave colonial countries and peoples the "right to self-determination", allowing them to freely determine their future and their political status. The key point of - colonies and have the right to self-determination. A referendum decides whether to become an independent country! The seriousness of the

problem is that was on the list of colonies recognized by the United Nations and at that time, and Hong Kong and Macau were among them! At that time, China had not been carried into the United Nations by its African brothers and had no say at all on this pressing issue. It was not until 1971 that China's legitimate seat in the United Nations was restored at the 26th United Nations General Assembly, and China began to address this issue.

On March 8, 1972, Huang Hua, China’s ambassador to the United Nations, wrote to the United Nations stating China’s position: Hong Kong and Macau are the result of a series of unequal treaties imposed by imperialism on China. Hong Kong and Macau are part of China's territory occupied by the British and Portuguese authorities. The resolution of the issues in Hong Kong and Macau is entirely within the scope of China's sovereignty and does not fall under the usual so-called "colonial" category.

China’s attitude and stance is very firm: Hong Kong’s sovereignty belongs to me! Hong Kong is not a colony. Therefore, China requires that the erroneous reference to Hong Kong and Macau as "colonies" be deleted from all documents. On November 8 of the same year, the United Nations General Assembly passed a resolution to delete Hong Kong and Macau from the list of colonies. However, the UK pretended to be deaf and mute and stirred up trouble, publicly stating: "The actions of the United Nations General Assembly will in no way affect Hong Kong's legal status." China ignored it.

On March 17, 1997, on the eve of Hong Kong's return to , " People's Daily " published an article "Why is Hong Kong not a colony?" The article said: "So far, the British have implemented typical colonial rule in Hong Kong, but it does not mean that Hong Kong is a colony. Because, in the usual sense, a colony mainly refers to a country that has lost its sovereignty due to foreign rule and jurisdiction. "Hong Kong is part of China's territory, so the colonial concept does not apply to Hong Kong."

Despite this, the teaching materials on Hong Kong Island still talk about themselves and sell the fallacy that Hong Kong is a British colony.In the eyes of some people in Hong Kong, their role model is Singapore - however, Singapore is a British colony, and its independence is also due to this identity. Hong Kong cannot learn from Singapore, because there is a strong motherland to the north of the Shenzhen River , and she does not agree!

Regarding the question of whether Hong Kong is a British colony or under colonial rule, not only many locals in Hong Kong, but also many mainland students who have received a certain level of education do not know much about it. This is the problem - 's habitual and careless problem statement is most likely to distort the rhythm and confuse people's minds. The new version of Hong Kong textbooks must be completely decolonized and eliminate the worries in some people’s minds.

The Hong Kong Police Force will fully switch to the People's Liberation Army Forces starting from July 1, which is great! The appearance and appearance of the Chinese army are among the best in the world. Why should they imitate the British? In previous Hong Kong films, I was trained in Scotland Yard and . So what! The redbud has been blooming for twenty-five years, and the Pearl of the Orient is still beautiful and dazzling. Goodbye, Hong Kong Royal Police , wait for the Hong Kong Public Security Bureau to come online!