I wonder if you have discovered something? Whether it is domestic war movies or foreign war movies, there is a very traditional theme, which is to weaken the strength of the army. Not only war movies, but also some science fiction movies even portray the army as weak chickens. The existence simply describes the army as an existence with worrying combat effectiveness. Then, the question arises. Why do war movies like to weaken the strength of the army?
First of all, this is really not nonsense. The most typical one is definitely Transformers. I remember it was in the second movie. A nuclear-powered aircraft carrier of the US military was actually taken over by several robots. And that one In the movie " Netherworld ", the strongest special forces of the US military were crushed in various ways, and even in the domestic "Operation Red Sea", a small team was beaten by the armed forces of the third world , let alone other movies. So, why has this become a common inertia?
First of all, we have to talk about the true combat power of the army. Maybe in the eyes of many people, or maybe because of the influence of war movies, they think that war movies are about both sides shooting at each other with weapons, or else driving a tank out to fight. But in fact this is impossible. The real situation is that in modern warfare, there is first a wave of artillery fire coverage, and then a wave of air strikes, and the ground troops have no chance to take action.
Take the movie as an example. If it were shot according to a real war and the subtitles would be out in less than ten minutes, what else would be interesting about this movie? Obviously it's impossible. Therefore, real war movies cannot be shot completely in a real way like many movies. To put it bluntly, what do current war movies need to pursue more? It's profit, it's box office performance, and this is something that many wars don't have.
Audiences are more willing to see fierce battles between soldiers from both sides, because in such a scene, the picture is more exciting and the visual impact on the audience will be greater, so the audience is more willing to go into the cinema and pay for this movie, and If you take pictures based on those armies in real wars, the soldiers are waiting in the rear, and the missiles and artillery in the rear are bombarding them indiscriminately, and then the air force is dispatched to operate as fiercely as a tiger.
In the end, the infantry followed the armored vehicle . Then, this movie has absolutely nothing to watch. Who would want to watch this movie? There is no doubt that such a movie will definitely have its place in the box office of the year and the title of the worst movie of the year. Therefore, real war movies cannot be based on real war movies at all, like the Russia-Ukraine conflict. , is the real war. The war movies we see are more like entertainment for the audience.
