was browsing the headlines and came across an article about talking about pictures. The picture is as shown in Figure 2. is a collection of portraits from Stephen Chow's works. After the author confirmed who was in which work one by one, he sighed, only Stephen Chow can be so profound!
I want to tell the author, are you sure this is profound? His method is the same as Benshan Media , which is to label each character and commonly used actors. This is the simplest and lowest way to create characters. There is no flesh and blood, no soul, and all the jokes come from nonsense.
What is the connotation of comedy? It's a tragedy. Stephen Chow's comedies have always lacked the description and analysis of human nature, and they also lack the ability to foreshadow and highlight the lens art.
saying that Stephen Chow is profound is the same as saying Zhao Benshan is profound. Before the story unfolds, each character has a label. This one is a lame, that one stutters, and another one is a psycho. There is no normal person in the whole play. Using abnormal human beings to show abnormal plots to make people laugh is completely divorced from life and reasonable logic. How can such a work be profound?
I don’t know why the author prefers Stephen Chow so much, but I understand that the author lacks the basic ability to observe society and the basic concern for the people at the bottom. Otherwise, how can he describe the work that distorts the people as profound?
When did our Chinese people's ability to appreciate literature and art become so underground? We regard vulgarity as comedy, and we are so complacent about it.
I tell this author that only the "Two Sons Series" filmed and starring Mr. Chen Peisi in the 1980s is a real comedy, because it keeps up with the times, takes root in life, and tells the stories of the people themselves.
I don’t like Stephen Chow because his works don’t have truth, goodness and beauty!
