Recently, the Ministry of Education has studied and formed "Interim Measures for Administrative Penalty for Off-campus Training (Draft for Comments)" , and publicly solicited opinions from the public.
It is reported that the " draft for soliciting opinions " proposes that natural persons, legal persons or organizations recruit preschool children and primary and secondary school students over 3 years old to the public, and conduct off-campus training in violation of regulations, and should be given administrative penalties .
Specifically, through instant messaging, online meetings, live broadcast platforms, etc., those who use residential buildings, hotels, cafes and other places to conduct subject training for a fee in the name of consultation, cultural communication, quality expansion, , residential teachers, summer camps or custody, are all "off-campus illegal make-up lessons."
And the punishment measures for these illegal acts have also been clarified:
"If the circumstances are serious, a fine of not more than 50,000 yuan will be imposed; if the circumstances are particularly serious, a fine of not more than 50,000 yuan will be imposed."
So around the school, teachers or training institutions that have been transformed, such as Xueersi and New Oriental , and still communicate and discuss paid tutoring with parents in private in various forms and names. It is probably going to be completely disappointed.
actually implemented in double reduction . After some large and medium-sized education and training institutions transformed, went bankrupt or ran away, some in-service teachers or training companies that originally made a lot of "creative" in off-campus training.
If you buy a cup of milk tea, you can have a dedicated person to tutor your homework;
will be a makeover to conduct "Chinese studies tutoring" or "cross-cultural exchange";
will also be trained on the surface for children to train sports but actually teach questions on the court.
Anyway, it is who is determined to take advantage of the loopholes in the double reduction policy, and take advantage of the parents' mentality of hoping that their children will be successful and their education anxiety to make a fuss about their children and give them greater learning pressure and homework burden.
And for parents, if their children's academic performance has declined, it is indeed a very headache:
directly invites the teacher to his home for a make-up lesson, saying that he is his relative. As long as the parents of students find out, it will undoubtedly report it;
sends the children to various training classes in the name of summer camps and quality training, which is particularly expensive and the score improvement effect is not obvious.
So, after the release of the "Draft for Soliciting Opinions", many parents seem to be deeply confused and confused about their children's learning again.
After all, If children can focus on listening to classes and studying self-discipline, most parents will definitely be happy to spend less money and effort , so that their children can save their time and energy in cram school every day, learn their interests and hobbies, and do what they like, wouldn’t it be beautiful?
The problem is that more and more children, under the educational methods of " Chicken Kid ", are increasingly highlighting their anxiety and eagerness for quick success and instant benefits, and are becoming less and less interested in studying, studying and preparing for exams. For a long time, they have even begun to experience irresistible burnout in going to school, making up for classes and exams.
In this way, students' grades decline, parents are anxious, and they are always staring at the training institutions that are anxious about doing business, so they naturally find "business opportunities" to take advantage of the situation and start classes.
Fortunately, the heavy hammer of the double reduction policy of knocked apart the ambition of crazy expansion of large and medium-sized training institutions. The release of the "Draft for Soliciting Opinions" will inevitably deter and punish those teachers or institutions who want to evade the supervision and review of education policies through "changing patterns", "changing forms" and "clever packaging" methods, and continue to carry out illegal tutoring around schools.
This is indeed a good thing for students and parents who have been forced to participate in "national tutoring" in recent years, driven by educational anxiety and social atmosphere.
Of course, some parents also expressed their own different opinions on the practice of "off-campus tutoring" in relevant institutions:
"It is of course not good to blindly add burden to children, but the teaching level of teachers in some schools is really poor. Even if the children have always been able to study actively and consciously, a bad teacher has taught the children's only little interest in learning. Now all kinds of off-campus tutoring classes are eliminated, then will the children's studies be delayed?"
Furthermore, also has many parents, and they have complained about internal tutoring classes in some private schools.
After all, most children are studying in public schools. Social public opinion and management departments supervise public schools teachers in particular, but there is a lack of certain disclosure and attention on the internal tutoring phenomenon of some private schools and repeat schools, which is obviously not conducive to the realization of educational equity and the reduction of students' burden.
However, in the future, all high school children will participate in the college entrance examination. If some schools can make up for the lessons and some schools strictly prohibit them, the difference in grades between students will definitely be obvious.
In short, the "Interim Measures for Administrative Penalty for Off-campus Training (Draft for Comments)" for the identification and punishment of off-campus training, after public soliciting opinions and revisions, may impose severe administrative penalties of less than 50,000 yuan or more than 100,000 yuan for all kinds of "illegal tutoring" behaviors of less than 50,000 yuan, or even more than 50,000 yuan or less.
believes that with the release of a series of policies and regulations, the learning pressure of primary and secondary school students and the educational burden of parents will definitely be significantly reduced.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-