According to the teacher's mindset, the first question must be to choose "train", because except for "train", the other three items are fuel-based cars, and all three can drive on the road; while the train can only drive on the rails in a regular manner. Once "detrait" it means that the car is destroyed and people are killed. However, according to parents' thinking, cars are private cars, and the other three are obviously not private cars. This reason is a bit far-fetched, but you can't say that there are problems with the other party's thinking.
Second question Goose, ducks, and chickens are all poultry, all with wings, and they all survive on land, which is essentially different from fish that live in various waters. As for the student who chose a chicken who couldn't swim, we have to say that the child's brain circuit is particularly novel, and such an answer will inevitably give people a refreshing feeling.
So the question is: Is it because our Chinese language exam standard answers are too conservative, or is it because students' thinking is more active, which leads to such a phenomenon? I personally think that it is best not to take questions with ambiguous answers. If you have to take the exam, it is necessary to take the exam in another way.
For example, the four options for the first question are not only to ask students to choose different types of items, but also to let students write down the specific reasons for this choice. As long as the reasons for the students' writing are convincing, the teacher can give students appropriate points, or simply give students full marks on this question.
In this way, the original intention of cultivating students' aggregated thinking can be replaced by cultivating students' divergent thinking. This move can not only improve students' efficiency in doing questions, but also effectively cultivate students' thinking ability. It kills two birds with one stone. Why not do it? As for the single-choice questions, the questions require students to choose the correct answer. As a result, there is more than one correct answer among the four options. You must not get such ambiguous question, otherwise it will be a joke.
After marking the paper, the teacher will give different answers to the students, especially the controversial answers. It is best to understand why they do this first. If the dialect is reasonable, then the students can affirm the way they think about problems from different angles, rather than criticizing them in a simple and crude way, and then sarcastic manner. This will dampen the students' enthusiasm for learning and will also cause students to be too lazy to think in subsequent learning. This is harmful but not beneficial to the study of related subjects.
Let students become confident in thinking. If the teacher carefully cared for the students' confidence, then students will become more and more interested in learning.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-