It is a pleasure to read articles and listen to music. Leave a message to inform you what you want to hear (all paid lossless packages)
With the sudden change and development of the mobile phone market, no matter what positioning products are, it shows a rapid increase in the number of products, commonly known as "the speed of new phone replacement" . Anyway, it is called the same, but this phenomenon will lead to a problem. In the face of the increasing number of mobile phone products, how should we consumers choose? This question is difficult and easy, because it depends entirely on everyone's different cognition.
In layman's terms, it can control the ultimate operation of mobile games, and at the same time, the quality and details of various functions are done very well. Then such a mobile phone is flagship and . Similarly, it can control all functions, and at the same time, it can guarantee that it will charge every two days. Then such a mobile phone is a mid-range mobile phone . Furthermore, it can control functions and battery life very well, so such a mobile phone is a cost-effective product.
or above is our basic understanding of flagships, mid-range phones and cost-effective phones.
Next, let’s take the cost-effectiveness of thousands of yuan as an example to talk about the essential things.
First of all, what is a cost-effective mobile phone worth 1,000 yuan? Generally speaking, cost-effective mobile phones are divided into two categories in terms of price. One is the range of above 1,000 yuan and below 2,000 yuan, and the other is the range of 1,000 yuan.
Although we divide the cost-effective mobile phone into two categories according to the price, you should not be confused by the price, because no matter what the price of the cost-effective mobile phone is, the commonality of is based on battery life. "The battery life here is the objective battery capacity, and it has little to do with fast charging". The function experience is the standard "or benchmark" , but here has two aspects for the cost-effective mobile phones on the market. "One is, The functions are complete, the second is that the details and functions are comparable to flagships. "Written first, because the cost-effective mobile phones have the above two differences.
Finally, I returned to the superficial. The fundamental reason is that the price must be cheap. Why says that the price is superficial? In fact, the reason is that "when we look at a product, it is recommended to put the price behind our minds first and focus on the functions, performance, and black technology of the phone itself." will be more interesting. But in this way, many people will be obsessed with one aspect, because humans like to be obsessed with it. This is something that there is no way, so we can only try to be less obsessed with it, and it is OK to have more dialectics and rationality.
At this moment do you understand what a cost-effective mobile phone is? There is no doubt that battery life is the first and function is the second, and cheap price is the most basic element. Looking at all cost-effective mobile phones on the market with the above three ideas, you can basically understand the things behind the cost-effective mobile phones.
But one thing is emphasized, with the current changes in the mobile phone market, we should not simply look at cost-effectiveness based on the cheap price, especially for cost-effective mobile phones under 1,000 yuan. On the surface, they give people the impression of being a "salted fish product", but in fact they are far-reaching products.
Why is cost-effective and effective? In fact, we are inspired by a mobile phone. This mobile phone is OPPO A35. Although the price of this phone is 899 yuan, its corresponding version is 4GB+64GB. It is obviously a useless salted fish product. Although the surface is indeed OPPO A35 is a useless salted fish product, it is precisely because it gives ordinary people the impression that it is extremely low-end that we get inspired from the perspective of "the best is like water"
? There is no doubt that what's wrong with the low-end one? To be honest, if you look at the low-end phone from the perspective of mobile phones, it is natural to say that "the audience of low-end phones mainly pursues backup machines, or the elderly phone as the main one". Then there are some that do not care about the ultimate performance and ultimate function. For mobile phones, it is based on the attitude of "just useable". Therefore, from the backup machines, elderly phones, and indifferent to functions and performance, it can be concluded that the key element of low-end phones is battery life "objective battery capacity"
and then the functions can basically ensure a certain basic operating experience. Just like the OPPO A35 mobile phone, said that "using 4230 mAh and fast charging 10W" in terms of objective battery capacity, basically does not meet the current cost-effective battery life standards, so the description of this phone is also low-end cost-effective , but it is that simple. Then in other functions, since it is an elderly machine, do you think it will be strong? It definitely doesn't exist, so the functions of this phone are almost guaranteed to have a basic experience. However, it is worth noting that the screen is made of 6.52-inch LCD material, a refresh rate of 60HZ, and an eye protection foundation is OK.
So, whether the cost-effective mobile phone is good or not is determined by user needs, and how many sub-positions of cost-effectiveness are mainly due to the different needs of a wide range of users, so what inspiration can you get from the OPPO A35 mobile phone? Why not interact.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
