Professor Nan Huaijin's statement on the sources of the "Gua" and "Xiantian Bagua" in the Book of Changes
has become Yixue Confusion in the learning environment
Guessing the origin of "Bagua" has become a misguide and obstacle to the study of Yi.
Regarding the question of how the "Bajing Gua" and the "Innate Bagua Diagram" are generated, in the past decade or so, due to the mainstream media platforms, the people who preach and spread the knowledge of the "Book of Changes" are mainly from Taiwan's "Yi Xue" "scholar. Among them, there are more influential professors such as: Professor Nan Huaijin, Professor Professor Zeng Shiqiang , Professor Professor Fu Peirong , Professor Ni Haixia and so on.
They popularize the knowledge of Chinese learning, propaganda and teach the Book of Changes, give video lectures in major media, go to live lectures in many places across the country, open online classes, publish articles, and write books. All of a sudden, it had a big impact on the domestic environment of learning Yi and the growth of Yi learning thoughts. Professor Nan Huaijin's "Shuzhu" "I Ching Di Zhuan" and "I Ching Miscellaneous Notes", Professor Zeng Shiqiang's " I Ching Mystery ", etc., have become popular books for a period of time. The content and viewpoints they talked are clearly oriented and influential. They have created a craze for learning "Yi-learning" in China for a long period of time.
However, scholars in Taiwan have based their cognition on the key points of "Yi Xue", such as how the "Bagua" is produced, and how the "Innate Bagua Diagram" is formed. And the wrong guesses are almost unanimously spread and rumored, which also brings a lot of difficulties to the academic environment of "Yi Xue" in China.
At the same time,Because of the lack of research results on the study of Yi (or insufficient dissemination) in China, it cannot be understood and convinced. Gradually, a wrong understanding has been formed. There are a group of people who study and talk about the knowledge of the Book of Changes who are studying, delving into, propagating, and disseminating such absurd claims, and these influences will be further expanded. This is indeed not a good thing.
Professor Nan Huaijin said:
Regarding how the "gua" is produced, Professor Nan Huaijin (1918-2012) said in the "I Ching Miscellaneous Notes": "The hexagram is hung. Phenomenon, gossip tells us that there are eight things in the universe, and the phenomena of these eight things are gossip."; "☰, the first qian hexagram represents the sky. When we look up, the sky is always above it. , When you get to space, turn your head upside down. The sky is still above your head, and the sky must be above your head. ☷, 坤 hexagram is the earth, human beings are the culture of the earth, the earth always steps under the feet, and the phenomenon of this earth hangs there. ......☲ Li Gua represents the sun. ☵ Kan Gua represents the moon.”
Regarding what is innate gossip, Professor Nan Huaijin said in the "I Ching Miscellaneous Theory": "What is'Xiantian'? With philosophy According to the view, everything in the universe was so-called innate before it was formed. With everything in the universe, it will be the day after tomorrow."; "Now that we put the topographic map of China in front, it would be even better. At that time, the gossip was drawn. Taking our China as the base, try to look at the four hexagrams of Gen, Dui, Zhen, and Xun. Gengua is in the northwest, while the northwest plateau of our country is a high mountain. Gengua is the representative mountain. To the southeast is duigua, and the southeast of our country is the ocean...but the southwest is windy, the southeast is more rivers and oceans, the northeast is more thunderous, and the northwest is more high mountains. This gossip pattern represents All the phenomena of the universe, the plane phenomenon, represents the topography of China, because it is based on China.”
Professor Nan Huaijin’s statement, we don’t know whether it came from after the war of liberation. inherited,However, it did extensively influence the understanding of gossip by a large number of scholars in Taiwan, such as Professor Tseng Shiqiang and Professor Fu Peirong. At the same time, it has also become a mainstream view in our country.
However, it is indeed a pity that this seemingly reasonable and more "rigorous" and can withstand argumentation is only to illustrate the gossip pattern and the orientation of the Xiantian gossip map, and then it is hard to add A set of rhetoric for gossip patterns and gossip graphs. The essence is that, before understanding what the "gossip" is, it is just "sorry for the new words."
.
