In the past three months, the core service providers under Amap have been subject to a wave of administrative penalties across the country due to issues such as safety management, illegal operations, illegal dispatching of orders to unlicensed drivers, and irregular operations.
In particular, the core services actually controlled by AutoNavi through equity pledge, such as travel with China, timely use of cars, proper e-travel, etc., have become frequent visitors on the penalty list, which makes the majority of drivers question whether AutoNavi has already Lost basic compliance management capabilities?
What is even more puzzling is that service providers have been heavily fined one after another, but Amap itself rarely takes responsibility. Serious cases are also like Yichang , Nanning and other regions, which only require AutoNavi to remove illegal service providers. For AutoNavi is limited to interviews without actual fines.
It is clear that Amap is the one that dispatches orders to the service provider's drivers. It is clear that Amap has the authority to review the drivers who take orders, but it is completely free from supervision and punishment. The brilliance of the aggregation platform is fully reflected here.
