Disclaimer: This article aims to convey more market information and does not constitute any investment advice. The article only represents the author's point of view, and does not represent the official position of Marsbit.
editor: Remember to follow
Source: MarsBit
Original Title: This is why Phrasees Like 'Giving People An on-Ramp to Crypto' Make Absolutely No S ENSE to Me.
I am not interested in blindly criticizing encryption technology. After all The second time with new technology was born, people are full of doubt, for example, it is not expanding, useless, and technology is not innovative at all. On the contrary, I also hope that the feasibility of self -custody of user data, or the security of smart contracts, or the security of smart contracts. In -depth discussions.
has some obvious ways to decompose crypto technology, but it will also make the encryption lose its unique features, just like someone said: "If you try to repair the encryption technology, it may no longer be encrypted technology anymore anymore. "
In general, when something is very technical and complex, this is useful because it will make users tired of understanding and think that this is advanced technology. But if the user owns even if the ownership of this social application data, or it can be transferred, or it can be securitized. What is the significance of this application?
open source has become a more effective writing. The way to manage software, but as far as users are concerned, it does not have any differences. But the innovation of web3 lies in software, which is completely different.
If some content is very technical, it is confusing and difficult to use, it is easy to be damaged. It can let the public help you solve its problems by removing its complexity. But the abstraction layer means control and centralization. Taking user experience as the standard. If you apply web3 with such a purpose, is it still web3?
is therefore needed to do a parallel method -technically use open source to run, but it is not open -it runs in Amazon Amazon Amazon You can't change it in or your iPhone. It does not pass the purity test. So, if the cryptocurrency fails to pass the purity test, it retains some key features. What ways can it make it have a widely used practical application?
I think that most ordinary users will not care about encryption or or WEB3's so -called principles, ideological , or moral standards, just like they do not care about whether this thing is open source.
So, either the user does not need to know (just like you don't need to know that Amazon or your iPhone is full of OSS), or enable some functions they will care about. But you have to do it right and do well. If the encryption technology supports X, we like X, we will use X, but we will not use X because it is encrypted technology, such contradictions really exist.
This is why it is meaningless to me, like "a entry of people entering encryption". It is not because it is the entrance to Arm and WCDMA. You must start with the user experience.
Editor in charge: Kate
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-