I remember a football reporter said a few days ago: is innocent in front of Chinese football! In fact, it’s not difficult to understand, because Chinese football is not good, so all the sprays are right. If you want to refute, you will take actual actions? It is precisely because of this that every time the Football Association introduces some policies, it will inevitably be questioned by fans. After the end of the 2020 season, the new team of the Football Association introduced a policy, which was questioned by fans as being specially formulated for SIPG.
Since Chen Xuyuan became the chairman of the Football Association, every policy issued by the Football Association will be more or less linked to SIPG by fans. There is no alternative. Who made Chen Xuyuan once the chairman of SIPG? The new name changed by SIPG a few days ago, fans and the media were questioning the Football Association's double standard. Closer to home, or back to the beginning of the topic. What policy has the Football Association introduced that was questioned by fans as being formulated specifically for SIPG?
After the end of the 2020 season, the Football Association once again imposed a salary limit under the salary limit policy of the previous year. The Football Association has also introduced a policy called "transfer lock" while limiting salary. Just listen to the name and you will know the meaning. If you want to transfer, you must be locked and not let you go. According to the written meaning of the Football Association, "The team has a player contract expired. If the team is still willing to renew the contract with the team and the maximum salary is given, the player can only renew the contract with the team and cannot transfer. Meet his team".
When this policy was introduced, many fans questioned that it was formulated for SIPG. Because as early as when the transfer was locked out, there was gossip that Yan Junling wanted to leave. So some fans think that after this policy of the Football Association comes out, Yan Junling will not be able to leave because SIPG can use the transfer lock to keep Yan Junling. What I never expected was that Evergrande might take the lead in becoming a profit-maker for this policy that fans thought was formulated specifically for SIPG. After all, the "transfer lock" is not unique to a certain team, but every team has two "transfer lock" quotas.
This year’s Super League transfer period is very strange.Many players from giant clubs such as Suning, Shanghai SIPG, and Evergrande are unwilling to continue their contract extensions after their contracts expire, and they are still in the case of a maximum salary. For example, Evergrande’s new door god Liu Dianzuo’s original contract expired on December 31, 2020, but until now, there has been no news of the two parties renewing the contract, and there was also news that Liu Dianzuo was unwilling to renew the contract. , I want to return to Dalian to play. In fact, in this transfer window, only Xu Xin and Liu Dianzuo have not officially renewed the main players whose contracts have expired at Evergrande. I heard that both of them want to leave. One wants to go to Dalian, the other wants to go to Shanghai Shenhua.
However, with Evergrande holding the "transfer lock", it may not be easy for Liu Dianzuo and Xu Xin to leave. As long as Evergrande activates the "transfer lock", with a maximum salary of 5 million for the two, they can only continue to play for Guangzhou Evergrande, and other clubs simply cannot dig. Therefore, when this policy of the Football Association has not been used by SIPG, Evergrande may become the first profiter. In fact, fans have misunderstood the meaning of the Football Association’s establishment of a transfer lock. It was not formulated for SIPG, but to prevent someone from using signing fees to attract player transfers and creating an unfair competitive relationship when the salary is limited. , Disrupt the normal transfer order!
.
