At this table tennis World Cup, Mima Ito became the focus of attention of the media and fans, one of which is her so-called "new serve". Because Mima Ito's play style determines that she pays much attention to the first three rebounds, and the core of the first three rebounds is the serve. Mima Ito played a total of four games, 4-1 Tian Zhixi in the first round, Chen Siyu 4-1 in the second round, losing 2-4 to Sun Yingsha in the semifinals, and swept Han Ying 4-0 for the bronze medal.
Except for Sun Yingsha rarely eats her new serve, the rest is not eaten. Many fans watched Mima Ito's serve and thought there was a clear cover. But Mima Ito's serve is rarely directly penalized by the referee. I remember that in the match with Sun Yingsha, the referee only warned her of the serve and did not directly penalize her. Why did the referee "turn a blind eye" to her serve? The sixth person of
believes that Mima Ito's serve is really fancy, and she herself admits that she can't serve the same ball, and there are indeed many types. Many fans also think that her serve is as good as dancing. This is a matter of opinion.
The referee does not impose penalties, which does not mean that there is no violation. But an important reason why the referee does not make a penalty is that when Mima Ito touched the ball, he moved very quickly, and almost the referee couldn't judge whether there was any cover. So the referee can't conclude that it is occlusion, and can only default.
is even more critical that none of the opponents who have played with her say that she serves to cover up, at most, she says that her serve changes a lot. Although she can't catch her serve, the referee will not question her serving violations during the game. This is also a very important objective reason. In turn, it will affect the judgment of the referee. If your athletes think there is no cover, it should be no cover.
Also, Mima Ito’s new serve is exactly the same as her original serve. The difference is that the preparation before serving is more exaggerated. It is innovative while spreading the pancakes. During the serve, the racket is shaken hard, which makes it more difficult to judge the rotation of her serve. The sixth person thinks that her serve sometimes It's a temporary play, so there are more serve errors, and the action has not been finalized.
It is worth mentioning that Sun Yingsha seldom eats her serve now and has done a good job in receiving the serve. This shows that Sun Yingsha has a clear judgment on the spin of Ito's serve, and Guoping has worked hard in this regard. Facts have proved that Mima Ito's serve is not as terrible as imagined. During the game, the more you worry about eating her serve, the more likely it is that you will not receive it. Sun Yingsha did a good job in this regard, once she broke Mima Ito's serve, her threat was reduced by more than half.
Do you think Mima Ito’s serve violated the rules? Welcome to leave a message to discuss.
