was first published on the official account: Basketball Friends
Warriors lost to the Hornets!
The last five minutes of regular time + overtime, Kerr sent five smalls, indicating that in this game, Kerr is the one I want to accept
, but it is precisely this lineup that sent the Warriors to the guillotine
The reason why the Warriors' five smalls killed people is because:
The offensive end has " Splash Brothers " unsolvable shooting skills + everyone can hold the ball and push counterattack + everyone is willing to run + everyone can pass + everyone can throw three-pointers
Defensive There are 2-3 players who can defend more than 3 positions on the end. When encountering pick-and-roll, you can switch to defense without limit
. However, in this game, the advantages of five small offenses and defense were not played out.
caused this result. The subjective reasons accounted for 40% and objective reasons accounted for 60%
Let’s talk about the subjective reasons first: "Spring Brothers" collectively silenced, and the threat from the outside was insufficient
In this game, Curry three-pointers and 13 shots, Klay three-pointers and 1 shot 7 shots
In the last 5 minutes of the regular season, Curry made 4 three-pointers and hit 1 goal; Clay made 0 shots
In overtime, the two brothers threw three three-pointers in total (Curry 1, Clay 2) all missed the correctness
The bad feel brought a series of chain reactions:
The threat from the outside line → the opponent's defense line contracted, the personnel piled up in the basket → the difficulty of breaking through → the cooperation cannot be played → rely on personal abilities to solve the problem
Speaking of this, let's put the subjective reason first and take a look at the objective reason
html l5
The objective reason is only because of one person, that is, Hornets head coach Clifford
In this game, Clifford must be given a big thumbs up
He saw the Warriors join the five smalls and began to implement the tactics of killing people
and decisively took Plumley, replaced McDaniels, pushed PJ Washington to the 5th position, and set up a 4-front lineup
, and played the five smalls
The set of five smalls and the five smalls of the Warriors 5 smalls
Compared with that, it is not only more accurate but also higher
three-point shooting rate is more than 35%:
Hornets 4 people ( Hayward , PJ Washington, McDaniels, Smith Jr.)
Warriors 2 people (Curry, Mouth Brother)
height is more than 200CM:
3 people (Hayward , PJ Washington, McDaniels)
Warriors 1 person (mouth brother)
The threat from the outside brings enough offensive space, the height gap brings the advantage of inside offense
There is an offensive space and an advantage of inside. The rest of the work to do is to launch an impact on the Warriors' penalty area
1 I have to admit that the Hornets players did a great job in this regard
The last five minutes of regular time, the Hornets players did not make a three-pointer, except for two points, they were able to make a layup in the inside. l3
overtime, only McDaniels took a shot against the big open position and hit a three-pointer. The rest of the attacks were still ended through the inside
. On the premise of making full use of its own advantages, the Hornets player hit the Warriors' seven-inch
The offense was excellent, but there were some minor problems with the defense
In the 1-2 minutes of changing to a small lineup, the Hornets' defense did not immediately keep up with
PJ. Washington faced the pick-and-roll and thought. Recycling, this gave the Warriors a chance to close the score
When there were 3 minutes left in regular time, Clifford took advantage of the opportunity to pause to change the strategy of preventing pick-and-roll
Infinite switchover instantly turned on, cutting off the Warriors' pass-through system, forcing them to solve the problem through their personal abilities
You see, whether it is subjective or objective factors, the final solution is to solve the problem through their personal abilities
forcing the Warriors to end the game in a way that they don't like. Has Clifford been successful?
Of course, at this time, the Warriors are not without solutions. At most, they can just fight each other.
Give the ball to Curry and Wiggins
"Travel the way across mountains and build bridges across water". The Warriors rely on these two people to swing, can't they win?
Three days ago, Knicks faced the same problem. Relying on Brunson and Randall 's performance in the last moment, they both beat the Hornets. What's worse than Curry and Wiggins?
Curry thought so, and did the same, dragging the Warriors to overtime
As for the guy, emm... you have to give the ball to others!
