1. Chinese team ~ Italian team game big data. 1. Large scores and innings (see screenshot) 2. Technical statistics of the team of the Sino-Italian Battle. Offensive score: 35-53. The Chinese team has a clear gap in offensive ability, with a net loss of 18 points. Blocking score:

2025/05/0710:11:34 sports 1607

1. Chinese team ~ Italian team game big data. 1. Large scores and innings (see screenshot) 2. Technical statistics of the team of the Sino-Italian Battle. Offensive score: 35-53. The Chinese team has a clear gap in offensive ability, with a net loss of 18 points. Blocking score:  - DayDayNews

1, Chinese team ~ Italian team game big data.

1, big score and innings (see screenshot)

1. Chinese team ~ Italian team game big data. 1. Large scores and innings (see screenshot) 2. Technical statistics of the team of the Sino-Italian Battle. Offensive score: 35-53. The Chinese team has a clear gap in offensive ability, with a net loss of 18 points. Blocking score:  - DayDayNews

2, technical statistics of the team of the Battle of China and Italy.

offensive score: 35-53. The Chinese team has a clear gap in offensive ability, with a net loss of 18 points.

blocking score: 4-6. The Chinese team lost 2 points in net loss, with the main sub-attack Yuan Xinyue and Wang Yuanyuan . It was incredible that he didn't get a single point in the blocking. Block 4 was obtained by Wang Yunhuang , Gong Xiangyu , Diao Linyu and substitute deputy attacker Gao Yi , respectively.

serve score: 3-7, the Chinese team lost 4 points, 3 points were scored by Wang Yunzhang, and Li Yingying 1 sent.

lost points: 10-18. The Chinese team's offensive scoring ability is obviously not as good as the Italian team, but they still lost a lot of points.

1. Chinese team ~ Italian team game big data. 1. Large scores and innings (see screenshot) 2. Technical statistics of the team of the Sino-Italian Battle. Offensive score: 35-53. The Chinese team has a clear gap in offensive ability, with a net loss of 18 points. Blocking score:  - DayDayNews

2, Chinese women's volleyball team on the field player statistics.

1. Chinese team ~ Italian team game big data. 1. Large scores and innings (see screenshot) 2. Technical statistics of the team of the Sino-Italian Battle. Offensive score: 35-53. The Chinese team has a clear gap in offensive ability, with a net loss of 18 points. Blocking score:  - DayDayNews

3, statistics on the Italian team's players.

1. Chinese team ~ Italian team game big data. 1. Large scores and innings (see screenshot) 2. Technical statistics of the team of the Sino-Italian Battle. Offensive score: 35-53. The Chinese team has a clear gap in offensive ability, with a net loss of 18 points. Blocking score:  - DayDayNews

The three main side attackers of the Chinese team: Wang Yunhua scored 11 points, Gong Xiangyu scored 8 points, and Li Yingying scored 8 points. The three players scored a total of 27 points in three games (63 deductions, 22 blocked 3 times, and 10 mistakes were blocked), with a spike success rate of 34.92%, and an efficiency of 19.05%.

The three main side attackers of the Italian team: three players scored a total of 42 points in three games (1 blocked 36 for 71 deductions, 5 rounds, and 9 mistakes were blocked), with a spike success rate of 50.70%, and an efficiency of 38.03%. Egnu scored 27 points alone and tied with the Chinese team's three-sided attack. The ratio of side attacks is unparalleled.

The two major deputy attackers of the Chinese team: Yuan Xinyue scored 5 points and Wang Yuanyuan scored 4 points, totaling 9 points (1 of 21 deductions was blocked for 1 mistake, and zero blocking score).

The Italian team's two deputy attackers: Danesi and Rubian have a total of 21 points in three games (15 points in 20 deductions, 5 blocked and 1 shot, and 1 mistake was blocked). The comparison of the data of the secondary attacker cannot be compared.

The main attacker of the Chinese team, Li Yingying, who is regarded as the scoring champion and offensive core in every game, performed poorly in the strong confrontation, was completely out of shape, and still made many mistakes (first in the team), and still had few net scores (the fewest in the team). With the first ball (22), the spike success rate was 31.82% and the efficiency was only 9.09%, setting a lowest record. Data like

are too eye-catching and cannot bear to look at it directly. Such performance is unsatisfactory (more ball rights, more mistakes, low efficiency, few scores, less net gain, and less ball rights are not proportional to score, efficiency, net gain and contribution value), which is completely unrealistic with the previous title and ban on off-court.

The best player in this game is Wang Yunhuan. Wang Yunhuan is the player with the most obvious progress in the World Championships. None of them, like it! It is not surprising that

loses, and it is also expected. After all, it is not strong enough, but the data gap reflected on the field is so large that it is puzzling and thought-provoking. The Chinese women's volleyball team must summarize and face this gap carefully!

hopes that the Chinese women's volleyball team can be able to think about danger and dig deep into the potential in the battle between life and death against the Belgian team. will have normal and better performance! Have good performances in first pass, defense, blocking, and self-control, come on! Chinese women's volleyball team! [Light on the peace lamp][Light on the peace lamp][Light on the peace lamp]

1. Chinese team ~ Italian team game big data. 1. Large scores and innings (see screenshot) 2. Technical statistics of the team of the Sino-Italian Battle. Offensive score: 35-53. The Chinese team has a clear gap in offensive ability, with a net loss of 18 points. Blocking score:  - DayDayNews

sports Category Latest News