At the post-match press conference when Guoan played against SIPG, Stanley's sentence "The result of the draw may be more reasonable" was enough to give the opponent face. But Leco on the opposite side was already a little shameless, and he once again threw the blame for the loss

2025/04/2823:58:36 sports 1803

At the post-match press conference of Guoan's , Stanley's sentence "The result of the draw may be more reasonable" was enough to give the opponent face. But the Leco on the opposite side was already a little shameless, and he once again threw the blame for the loss! And his actions also gave the outside world a sense of incompetence.

At the post-match press conference when Guoan played against SIPG, Stanley's sentence

is the highest in the entire league, and the cards are also one of the best; then why did SIPG not play a performance that matches investment and cards? Objectively speaking, a huge change in the preparation period before the start of the season did have a great impact on the team, resulting in their poor play in the first stage and the huge gap between the three towns was opened early. However, after the first stage is finished and the second stage begins, there is a one-month interval in the middle; and for well-known reasons, after Shanghai SIPG played Cangzhou on September 1, the next game was already against Henan on September 20, which means there was another small break. After the first stage of

, it has been enough time for SIPG to adjust; an excellent coaching team should be able to adjust the team's condition, but it is obvious that Lecco did not do this! Before the Chengdu fight, Shanghai media "Shangguan News" criticized Leco's team for lack of order in offense and unclear ideas for substitution on the spot, "making the roast goose a pickle flavor." Of course, if you can get the points you deserve, the scene will be ugly and it will not be unacceptable; but facing Dalian, which is an all-Chinese team, facing Jose Kante, who has just been lifted out of quarantine and hastily joined the Cangzhou, and Guoan, who has long-term wage arrears, aren't these games that Shanghai SIPG should win? Why can't they take it? Especially in the fight against Guoan, they almost suffered a crushing defeat.

While everyone is dissatisfied with the results and the scene, there are also many doubts, such as why are the big list still unsatisfied?

First of all, this is related to injury. Wu Lei , Xu Xin , Feng Jin , Zhang Linpeng are all on the injury list; but Isa Caron, who came from summer, did not appear on the injury list, nor did he make it into the big list. Where did he go? This statement came from the team - Because Leco gave , Caron , the chances of the two clashed, so they would rather report the roster to dissatisfied, Leco would rather have to Caron than use it.

At the post-match press conference when Guoan played against SIPG, Stanley's sentence

For example, why are the controversial Zhang Huachen and Endiaye always reused by Leco? It is not visible at the current game or in the backcourt. Zhang Huachen, who has been doing ineffective running, can play a more tactical role than Yang Shiyuan ? Or was he still Li Shenglong stronger than a dozen times when Ndiaye fell down with the opponent's defender throughout the game, and his back-to-back success rate was almost 0, and he kept spitting cakes?

In addition, anyone with a discerning eye can see that these players are very unhappy on the court; especially when Vargas, who just came to the team, showed dissatisfaction with Zhang Huachen's handling of the ball many times, why was Leco still indifferent?

Everyone has seen the problem of Shanghai SIPG; but has Leco really realized it? After playing Guoan, he said that during the defense of set pieces, there were actually six to seven players in the penalty area who were nearly 1.9 meters tall, but they still lost points in the defense of set pieces and corner kicks. But Leco ignored one thing. The key to determining the quality of offense and defense of set pieces is not the figure of the player, but the coach's layout; on Guoan, when Xie Feng led the team, he focused on the offense design of set pieces. After Stanley came, he also focused on the offense of set pieces. On the other hand, Leco's team has not practiced set pieces well for a while; What's the surprise of a team that often practices set pieces in the game using set pieces offense to break through a team that basically does not practice set pieces? When defending the corner kick, when Zhang Huachen, Jiang Guangtai , Endiaye, Li Ang , Wei Zhen grab a point, the ball can also fall on Wang Shenchao to form an assist to the opponent. This is the head coach's problem.

At the post-match press conference when Guoan played against SIPG, Stanley's sentence

SIPG's performance has always been unsatisfactory. SIPG fans can't bear it anymore. Under the club's official microblog, "Leiko's dismissal" has been flooded with the screen.The Shanghai media did not save face for the club. Chen Hua, a famous media person in the Liberation Daily, said explicitly, "The coach Xi Zhikang and Xi are better than Leko, at least he knows the team." Zhang Dexiang, former president of " Oriental Sports Daily ", described Leco's coaching as "high-quality steak" burned .

Seeing the continued downturn in Shanghai SIPG, everyone was puzzled what Raike wanted to do! Of course, Leco has led all this so he can rest assured in this position, which brings a bigger question - what exactly does Zhang Min want to do in ?

After Zhang Min airborne the club and became the top leader, he proposed to build a century-old club. Since Shanghai already has the old brand of Shenhua, if Shanghai SIPG wants to build a club for half a year, it naturally has to compete with Shenhua for territory. They need to achieve better results and play better scenes to win fans. However, Chairman Zhang Min seemed to live in his own world. During the internal meeting, he even said stupid words like "SIPG registered fans 8,000, Shenhua registered fans 6,000" .

. When a stupid helmsman comes to control the market, many of his decisions are naturally unreliable. . If he doesn't change Leco at this time, it may also be related to selfishness.

At the post-match press conference when Guoan played against SIPG, Stanley's sentence

Many Shanghai SIPG fans are wondering, who bought the "pseudo-center" like Ndiaye that does not meet the team's needs? Who bought Isa Caron, which Leco doesn't use at all?

In response to similar questions, the explanation given by the club staff in private has always been - signings were made by the club according to the requirements of the head coach. , and the same broker introduced by Meistrovic, Xiao Paulinho , and the same broker introduced by Big Black and Lecco himself. But this shows that they were asked by Leco? Obviously not, otherwise everyone will not understand why Leco doesn't use Isa Caron. What's more, Leco's predecessors, Boas and Pereira , were restricted in the support they received in signings during their coaching in Shanghai SIPG. Does Leco have such rights?

In fact, a dish that has not been fried well is not only responsible for stir-frying, but also responsible for side dishes. Now that the dish is not fried well, the side dishes can also be blamed on the people who are cooking. But once you change to a gold medal chef, these dishes will still prove to be unsatisfactory, so who will bear the blame?

spent a lot of money for several consecutive years and bought a lot of people who are not very useful. The core framework of this team is still the old people in the first phase of Chongming, which is obviously not the problem of the head coach. When the outside world pointed the guns at Leco and asked him to continue to be scolded in this position, isn’t this a kind of protection for himself by the club’s senior management? Even if

is just used to take the blame, as long as Lecco still has value in utilization, I am afraid that Shanghai SIPG will not change its coach!

sports Category Latest News