Judging from the performance of the WTT Zagreb Challenge, both male and female national table tennis players have a relatively conservative attack in the first three boards. It's not that they don't have the ability to take the initiative to attack in the first three boards, but

Judging from the performance of the WTT Zagreb Challenge, both male and female national table tennis players have a relatively conservative attack in the first three boards. It's not that they don't have the ability to actively attack in the first three boards, is that they are unwilling to take the initiative to counterattack in the face of the opponent's offensive pressure, but passively wait for the opponent to counterattack before defending.

Active offense and passive offense are completely different concepts. You can't be frightened by watching your opponent play aggressively. As long as conservative psychological activities occur, it will be too difficult to reverse and win in the game. Take a look at the first three offenses of young Japanese table tennis players. From serving to placement and speed, they are all proactive and aggressive.

The main impression left by the young players participating in the national table tennis competition this time to the fans is that their playing style has no characteristics. The reason why this situation occurs in is that the national table tennis team is also at a crossroads in terms of play style. Guoping still insists on the stalemate style of defensive counterattack, but in the era of big ball, the shortcomings of this style of play have been exposed.

How many rounds does it take for both sides to score a point? Look at the simple first three boards of Japanese table tennis. You can score directly by creating a threat through the serve. does not require too much physical and energy. Japanese table tennis players pay more attention to the connection advantage of speed, and the quality of single cricket is also very high.

In the doubles match, Chen Yi / Kuaiman continued to eat Mima Ito 's serve. Japanese table tennis players worked hard on their serving skills and achieved good results in the competition. The impression that national table tennis players leave on fans is that they are always unable to show their full strength when facing Japanese table tennis players. The main reason is that the opponent restricted the performance of the national table tennis players in the first three boards, and the opponents did not compete with the national table tennis players.

So no matter how strong you are, if you can't show it, it still means that your technology is not comprehensive. Paying attention to the offense in the first three boards has become a consensus among fans. However, the current national table tennis style has not undergone any technical iterative upgrades in more than ten years. Both coaches and players still insist on a training model based on stalemate balls in terms of ideology.

This kind of technical passivity is reflected in the players born after 2000. Although Chen Yi and Kuaiman can also twist backhand during the serving session, their active offensive skills are rarely used. still has the mentality of focusing on defensive counterattacks during the game, one step is slow and every step is slow. cannot be the first to attack in the game, cannot form counter-suppression and can only passively lose points. When

Chen Yi faced Miu Hirano , he played too flatly and the quality of the return was average. When fell behind in the score, he still insisted on an offense without adding quality. The opponent was not a single-ball player. How could a player of poor quality have a better chance of counterattacking than these young players?

Now Japan's table tennis attack on the first three boards has become systematic. No matter which Japanese table tennis player is very sharp in the offense on the first three boards. Some fans think that we can just hold on to the opponent's attack on the first three boards. The key problem with is this. Since Japanese table tennis players insist on attacking on the first three boards, will they give you the space and time to hold on? The method of Japanese table tennis players is to pass with one stroke, focusing on the ultimate in speed and strength.

Facts have proved that not every player is Sun Yingsha and Wang Manyu . The excellence of these two players has been fully verified by the WTT Zagreb Challenge. Although they did not participate in the competition, the Japanese table tennis players won the championship, which further verified the advanced nature of these two players' playing styles.

Although Chen Yi and Kuai Man are both rising stars, their playing styles are not as distinctive as those of Sun Yingsha and Wang Manyu. They do not have the characteristics of threatening forehand and backhand attacks. The current national table tennis players are not particularly good at backhand or forehand, they are all relatively balanced types.

This is no different from the previous Ding Ning , Zhu Yuling , Liu Shiwen , so it is difficult to win against Japanese table tennis players. In 2017, Miu Hirano defeated the main national table tennis players in a row. Now he met the younger Chen Yi and still won easily. seems to have not changed at all compared to five years ago, except that the players Miu Hirano encountered have become younger.

None of the young players from the National Table Tennis Team can beat the main players from the Japanese Table Tennis Team, which in itself means a sense of crisis. Sun Yingsha and Wang Manyu were able to win adult competitions when they were 17 or 18 years old, but the younger generation are not yet at this level. This is completely backwards in the eyes of many fans. Why is the training level of the national table tennis team getting worse and worse?

In fact, the training level of national table tennis has always been maintained at that level, but Sun Yingsha and Wang Manyu are unparalleled players. The excellence of these two players in the past two years has given many fans the illusion that any national table tennis player can defeat the main Japanese table tennis players. It is not only the fans who have this idea, but also the national table tennis coaching staff.

That’s why the National Table Tennis Team will not send its main players to participate this time. It seems that the National Table Tennis Team will send six or seven players to participate, at least they can win the championship in singles. only has a numerical advantage but no technical advantage. Even if 100 people are sent to compete, the result will be the same. Although the coaching staff and fans are also envious of the large number of new players coming out of competitors Japan Table Tennis and Korean Table Tennis, so this time they sent a large number of young players to compete with them.

The young players of Japanese Table Tennis and Korean Table Tennis are focused on training, and they are not just young. The national table tennis players are ranked completely according to their age. As long as the national table tennis players win the championship and runner-up, the winner must be the older one. However, the older Kuaiman failed to defeat the younger Korean table tennis player Kim Na-young. It is too difficult to defeat her opponent by relying on her age advantage.

Because this is not a competition between national table tennis teammates, will the foreign players play tacitly? Sometimes the national table tennis teammates are used to playing with each other tacitly, but they really think that this rule is also applicable to international competitions. At least through this foreign challenge, the national table tennis coaching staff has become much more awake and can see the gap with their opponents. I don’t know what fans and friends think, please leave a message for discussion. Follow Erlang Shen’s talk about football and bring you the purest thoughts on table tennis.