In the first leg of the Champions League quarter-final, Juventus lost to Porto. There was a scene in the match that sparked everyone's discussion-near the end of the game, Ronaldo was placed in the penalty area by opponent defender Senussi. Down, the referee did not give CR7 a penalty. After the game, the analysis given by Gazzetta dello Sport was: the referee missed a key penalty kick from Juventus. After the two had physical contact, Ronaldo fell into the penalty area. This ball could have been harvested by the Bianconeri. A draw. At the same time, the four celebrities also feel that Ronaldo deserves a penalty. These four big players are the former Real Madrid coach Capello, the former Italian star Piero, and beIN’s commentator Wenger and Wired. Guest commentator, Gullit, one of the "Three Musketeers" in the Netherlands.
These four famous people felt that Senussi had made a more obvious foul before the end of the game. CR7 deserved a penalty. VAR did not make a correct judgment. In fact, this cannot be blamed on the video referee. The referee Grande thought that Senussi's actions were normal, so he did not watch VAR. Of course, the reason for Juventus's loss is not just a penalty. Those who have watched the game know that Pirlo used a system of attacking from the back, but this method is not as effective in the Champions League as they are in Serie A. After the game, Sleepy said at the press conference that he would stick to the mode of attacking from the backcourt. Bentankul did make a mistake in this game. However, a mistake does not prove that this system is unsuccessful, and the Bianconeri still has a chance to comeback in the next game.
Gullit supported Pirlo's backcourt offensive concept: "Initiating an offense from the backcourt is the correct concept of football. Some people say what is the use of a full offensive system in today's football? Of course it works— —Defensive counterattacks and fast-moving warfare are not attacks that can be launched all the time. I still support Pirlo’s backcourt offensive concept.” The author understands the reason why Gullit said so after the ball. For the international team, he is also a disciple of Michels, and of course he supports the development of the concept of teacher. Sleeping skin allows the team to attack from the backcourt, which is one of the infrastructure of Mi Shuai in the system. Later, Michels’s disciple Cruyff, his apprentice Guardiola and others all made variations on the mentor’s tactical system.
Whether it is the "reverse full offensive and full defense system" of Kesheng back then,Or Guashuai's pass and control football, all have the characteristics of attacking from the backcourt. In this system, the attacker is usually the midfielder. So Gullit believes that Pirlo's concept is completely okay, but Juventus needs to select a suitable offensive candidate. Ramsey obviously does not meet this requirement. After the ball, I feel that the Bianconeri defensive personnel are basically full-time defensive personnel. They can invest in the offense, but it may be more difficult for them to lead the offense. To a certain extent, Chiesa's goals in this game were also achieved by the concept of all-attack and all-defense. In other words, Sleephide needs to improve the efficiency of positional warfare while maintaining its own philosophy.
Pirlo admitted that Juventus lost the ball to Porto to a large extent due to errors, because the Bianconeri did not find a player in the frontcourt at the time, and Bentancourt tried to push the ball forward instead. very dangerous. Porto is obviously experienced in dealing with strong teams from Serie A-this Portuguese club defended from the whistle of the match, and obviously they know that Juventus is clearly above Porto in terms of the strength of the lineup. The author thinks that Wenger’s analysis in the game is also very convincing. He also affirmed that Sleeping Skin’s concept is correct, but the method suitable for the current layout of the Bianconeri is actually the former head coach Sarri or Alleig. Thinking inside.
Take Bentancourt's return error in the first half as an example. Although the error is accidental, under the tight defense of Porto, the defensive players will inevitably produce psychological pressure and make mistakes. Taremi scored with a shovel shot, which can be said to be a manifestation of the advantages of Porto's defense at all levels. So while Gullit supported Pirlo's offensive concept in the backcourt, he also praised Porto's defensive thinking from the frontcourt to be more targeted. In other words, Sleephide learns the essence of the concept of total offense and defense, and only learns the offensive aspect. If the coach can learn from Michels or Cruyff's defensive system back then, midfielders will devote more to the defense, and perhaps they can also reduce backcourt errors. At that time, everyone will not have to worry about whether Ronaldo should get a penalty or not, because this offense is due to CR7's personal ability.
.
