weekend is really too important. Before the fierce battle, Gazzetta dello Sport and Repubblica both pointed out: "Maybe the formations are similar, but Inter Milan and Juventus, Conte and Pirlo , are two completely different genres. "
as no surprise Or a surprise, the Italian Derby, Inter Milan and Juventus are likely to send 352 starting formations over the weekend. Both
teams have experienced some changes this season.
Inter Milan played 3412, played 3421, and finally returned to 352. Juventus is also constantly adjusting between various formations such as 442, 3412, 3421, 352. Both teams have taken some detours and lost some points. If in the end, both coaches choose 352 as the fighting routine of this life and death battle, it is undoubtedly a coincidence.
However, the Italian media emphasized: people always like to say that Pirlo "follows Conte", but since the beginning of the season, in the course of a series of changes, Pirlo has proved to everyone that he and Conte are similar. However, there is a fundamental difference in coaching philosophy. Conte is "general is greater than individuality", Pirlo is "people-oriented, formation is not important" .
commented that for more than a year, no matter how Conte changes his formation, some of his principles are absolutely untouchable.
Italian media cited two sets of examples.
one is Eriksson, Artur . Both
didn't know anything about Serie A before joining, and both had strong offensive ability and limited ability in fighting.
Conte gave Eriksson a chance to play, but while letting him play, he kept asking him to work hard, grab more and fight melee. Because in the eyes of Conte, you must do this in midfield. If you can't do this, it's a good bench.
So in Inter Milan, Eriksson had a miserable life and became an "unplanned player".
As a midfielder, Atul is also constrained by size, strength and style of play. In the early days of joining, he made many mistakes in the fight and performed mediocre.
But on the one hand, Pirlo kept talking to Artur, on the other hand, when he was sent on the field, he would fine-tune the division of powers and responsibilities in the midfield, so that other players could fight more and grab more, so that Artur could be less exposed. Weaknesses and show strengths.
So at Juventus, although Artur’s overall performance is not outstanding, the Brazilian has played 16 times in double lines so far this season, played 818 minutes, and became a qualified rotation player. Overall, he is also walking. Upward momentum.
The other group is Perisic, small Chiesa . Before joining the team,
were both wingers. In recent years, they have made great achievements and played wingbacks before joining, but they were not successful.
Conte’s use of Perisic this season is: transformation.
He wants Perisic to play the wingback, but the effect is not good, so he goes to the bench. Even if Inter Milan’s main left-wing defender Ashley Young is old and can’t hold the audience playing one game a week, Perisic can’t stand up, because at the wingback position, his appearance may not be as effective as Young How good is the professor.
Pirlo uses little Chiesa in a different way.
On the one hand, he will spend a lot of thoughts on arranging the "assistant" to cooperate with him to kick the wall beside Chiesa, and arrange the "thugs" to supplement the defense behind him.
On the other hand, he often changes into a four-back system, allowing Chiesa Jr. to play his more suitable wingers, even forwards. Since the
season, Chiesa has scored 5 goals in the double line, assisted 4 times and participated in 9 goals. His performance is fair. If you break down
, 2 goals and 2 assists are created when playing a 3-back system as a wingback, and the other 3 goals and 2 assists are created when a 4-back system is a winger.
Italian media cite these examples, not to compare players, but to analyze the concepts of the two coaches.
"Gazzetta dello Sport" pointed out that although Conte is inWen, Italy coached Pirlo during the period. Although Pirlo does not deny that it was Conte who gave him the idea of coaching, the coaching ideas of the two coaches are completely different.
Conte wants "soldiers", and Pirlo values "handsome talents".
For Conte, the most important thing is not the ability of the players, but whether the players can adapt to the overall routine. Once the routine is finalized, the players must change themselves to adapt. For Pirlo, the most important thing is the player's ability. As long as the player has enough ability, it doesn't hurt to change the overall routine for it. The formation number does not matter . The two ideas of
also gave birth to the different styles of the two teams.
Inter Milan runs tightly and occasionally looks stiff, described by Italian media as a "machine built for war" .
Juventus always has a genius, and occasionally appears messy, described by the Italian media as a "heroic distribution center" . Which
is better? Hard to say.
In today's football, both genres have successful precedents, and there are also lessons of failure. How can one simply distinguish between each other? In the sport of
, no one cares about the idea at all, and everyone cares about the result. Enter the competition to interpret the answers to the questions!
