Article comes from the WeChat public account: Memory carrier. Welcome to follow and read the full text.
Many people asked me a point of view, which comes from the Internet. It roughly means that the former Soviet Union lost the chip battle with the United States back then because they were not a pure free market mechanism.
Actually, I will tell you a trick, as long as you have no social experience, especially those who are studying in liberal arts, no one wants to apply for a company after graduation, and they have been writing articles within the system for two years, but they can't stay there.
No matter how you write it, it is an article.
He was telling you over and over again that the reason why things didn’t work was entirely blamed on the leader for not listening to me. who I am? I am a military advisor, I am a teacher. If the teacher doesn’t come out, what can the world be like?
Then the person below cried, sir, come out of the mountain, this is it.
You don’t believe it, you can read it, one hundred big Vs of similar origins, write a million articles, all of which means.
No matter what they write, it means this.
Why? Because this is their entire life experience.
In school, I read a few so-called literary classics all day long, and went back to the market to try it. Does anyone want it? No. You can only go within the system and be a pen, and you have to write whatever your leader asks you to write.
In fact, they just treat you as an typewriter , but you don’t know it yourself.
I felt aggrieved and felt that I was the current Zhuge Liang . The manuscript I wrote was beaten back all day long. I was so angry that I resigned and went to work as a self-media.
No matter what content these people write, they all have the same taste. To put it bluntly, they just want to vent their complaints about being unsuccessful.
I don’t mean to look down on anyone, I just tell the truth.
My assistant is a liberal arts student, from Peking University , and has been a reporter for ten years before. I told him all kinds of things all day long, but I didn’t let him write articles, and I didn’t let him express his opinion a word. Why?
Because no matter what he expresses, he will complain in the end, he can only complain or give in a random way.
He has never done practical things, has neither been responsible for large projects nor started a business, nor has he participated in any game of power or money.
Do you think I'm belittle him? NO.
He was so happy after hearing this. You said it in his words that he didn't want to write articles, and he never wanted to write articles in his life.
He has written it for ten years because there is no way. He has to make a living by relying on this and pretend to have a lot of opinions. Please be careful, pretending.
Now someone gives him five times the money, and it will cost him five years to work for a year. He told him, you don’t have to pretend, you don’t understand, you don’t have to do this, I will give you another job.
He was so happy that he didn't want it.
Remember this sentence, people’s cognition cannot surpass their own experiences. So if you force a liberal arts student to give advice on the country since graduation, you are also making things difficult for others.
shouldn't have such a profession at all.
expression must be classified, commonly known as listening to opinions, you must listen to professionals.
Can unprofessional topics be extended? Yes, but you must bring the focus back to your professional field.
I talked about medicine before, cross-professional, so what field did I focus on?
has fallen into the market field, into the capital field, into the distribution field.
Is it possible for me to tell people what to eat if you have a cold? Of course it is impossible. If you really express it like this, it will become nonsense.
Back to the topic of chips, I once interpreted this topic very clearly in the technology trade and trade industry and technology .
I said this is a market problem, there is no technology, industry and trade, and it won’t work. You can only trade industry and technology. If you make a product, it will definitely be imperfect at the beginning, and it will be high in price, poor in quality, and has no competitiveness.
Unless the market accepts you, gives you opportunities, gives you suggestions, and allows you to improve, you will have room for growth.
In other words, without user demand feedback, there is no way to develop technology. This is why there is only trade and industry technology.
What we really need to guard against is trade and trade, and what we advocate is trade and industry technology.
Then someone will ask, isn’t what you are talking about the failure of Soviet chips the same as others’ comments on? They all emphasize the important role of the market.
of course not.
The Soviet Union is not a problem of free market and planned distribution. Who told you that the market under the planned economy is not a market?
The Soviet Union lost not only chips at the beginning. It was difficult for them to win in any civilian field. This is essentially because the scale of its consumer market is obviously unable to increase.
If you have a little common sense, go back to the era of The United States and the Soviet Union competing for , you will find that the consumer population mastered by both sides is not of the same order of magnitude.
The consumer population of Europe, the United States and Japan is far greater than that of the former Soviet Union and his friends.
If the former Soviet Union had brought us on, even India, I mean if. This is really hard to talk about. Because China and India are both populous countries. The problem with
is that it didn't pull it up.
The former Soviet Union was a country with a sparsely populated country with only a small population. It was like a fool to develop the civil consumer industry.
This is common business knowledge. When I say this, businessmen understand what I am talking about in a second.
If you open a noodle shop, at least 100 customers will come in every day to live. If you can’t even sell 100 bowls of noodles, you can only close the door.
Because some things are fixed expenses, rent, water and electricity, your stove will be hot, and it will cost you a day to burn it.
Only when you start from the 101st bowl, you can make a profit. The previous one is to cover the rigid cost.
If this place is vast and sparsely populated, there are not even a hundred residents, where can one hundred people eat your bowl of noodles every day?
understand? It has nothing to do with whether you sell noodles in the free market or planned economy. No one in your place can make up for the base.
You say that your people are rich, and no matter how rich you are, you can't eat ten bowls of noodles a day, so the land is wide and the people are destined to be unable to establish a consumer industry chain.
Compared with the former Soviet Union, Europe, the United States and Japan are not only rich, they also have some, and there are also relatively dense populations to form a consumer market.
This is the starting point of the consumer industry chain, and no one can avoid it.
When we made chips, the cost of chips was rigid. If it was only three times, it would be meaningless to continue to do it, and the cost could not be held. The slitting back from
is called a test slitting test. The software running on FPGA may not be able to run on the test slitting test. There may be bugs and it will only appear under stress tests.
continues to be modified, and the modification is completed. The following is a small batch, and then a large batch. If you sell 1 million pieces, that is mature.
If there are no 1 million customers here, would you sell yarn? Can you figure it out
? Where is the person? I believe if I buy one mobile phone by myself, and do you believe if I buy one mobile phone by myself? Is this a money problem? No matter how rich he has, he will not buy ten mobile phones, nor will he eat ten bowls of noodles.
I said a few years ago that the market is very important in terms of chips. This market does not mean that you must develop it freely or lead it. That is not important. The market I am talking about is very important, which means that the market size must first be.
You have to be able to increase the amount!
I am a chip company who works in an operating system. Don’t I know how chips rely on to live? Just rely on quantity.
The population size is insufficient, which is a great restriction of the former Soviet Union. Today we have a very big advantage lies in the internal market. I mean internal demand, and the volume has started.
We have a population, really a population. You say that the middle class is only hundreds of millions, and the others have no money.He has no money and he is also a population, and he also has the ability to consume low-end products.
and the former Soviet Union did not. His basic population is not enough, so what is the consumer market competing for? It is to increase the quantity.
You have more than 50 million customers. Every extra one added above is a new profit. If you can't achieve 50 million customers, you will lose money no matter how you do it.
This is called the market model of consumer products.
In a nutshell, some people are not omnipotent, such as India, you are a little too poor. But no one can be. It is impossible to start a consumer market if there is not enough population.
So what is our routine today? It's just a circle of people. We must seize Africa, Southeast Asia, , Middle East , seize the markets in various densely populated areas, plus our own huge population consumption market.
As long as you grasp these places, the low-end and mid-end market will be in your hands and you will be able to increase the volume.
Once you start the volume, you can live, and with money you can develop and use time to keep pace with the high-end market.
This is not a profound insight. What I am talking about is the most popular and common business strategy.
Ten years ago, when I was in charge of the bidding on Party A, Hisi came to bid. They couldn't win, and they knew they couldn't win. But the two of us, as their respective technical leaders, drank and chatted privately. What we talk about above is what
talks about.
shows that everyone's mind was clear in that era. The idea is just this way of thinking, and the way of playing is just this way of playing.
You can think that this is called surrounding the city in the countryside, but the essence is to use the principle of starting the consumer market, occupy the middle and low end first, and with the help of profits, you can quickly or later tie the high end.
The real lesson left by the former Soviet Union is not what freedom or plan, but that they do not have enough population. Not only do I have no one, but I have not found enough population to form consumer demand on the outside.
Originally they were engaged in heavy industry, and we were engaged in light industry, and the problem was that they dumped us halfway, so they deserved it.
Their population size is that they can't move on without us.
The scale mistakes they made in the consumer product market were deeply understood by us in the following years.
Otherwise, do you really think that so many elites who get rich in business are novices, and are not as good as those who are working as secretaries and writing articles?
When those pseudo experts and real novices talk about research and development that is separated from the basics, they simply don’t understand the essence of economies of scale, and they don’t even understand the most basic business routines.
If you ask him to open a noodle shop, he won’t be able to survive. Zhuge Liang is still giving advice to the country.
No wonder Ouyang Feng told the villagers in " East Evil West Poison ", do you have confidence in those swordsmen who don't even have shoes?
article comes from the WeChat public account: Memory bearer. Welcome to follow and read the full text.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-