text/Dingfengboli
A few days ago, I saw a social networking company boss Weixingzhai’s owner posting a report saying that Sima Nan was reported. The title is "The political and educational professors of colleges and universities report Sima Nan to the Discipline Inspection Commission. Is Sima Nan exhausted? 》, and then I learned that Sima Nan was reported
What is more worth mentioning is that one month ago, he also wrote a widely circulated article "For the sake of China's national interests, it's time to let Sima Nan and his teammates leave." This article has little content, about 1,500 words, with a display volume of tens of millions and a reading volume of more than 8 million. It should be said that this is an article that is not detailed and the content is not professional. As for why it can have such a large amount of display, it is a matter of opinion and wise.
The main article is to quote economic development policies and data from private enterprises, and then it is concluded that Sima Nan questioned Lenovo under the pressure of the overall economic environment. Sima Nan was also described as: has always used the leadership of the public opinion to consciously inspire public opinion, incite populism, bewitch people's hearts, and buy people's hearts. Whenever they provoke confrontations and conflicts, the result will inevitably be torn apart ethnic groups, turmoil society, causing chaos to society, and affecting the confidence of business development. After watching
, I personally commented that this is a creation out of nothing, taking advantage of social and economic anxiety. As for why it can be so widespread, there may be two things to note: First, Sima Nan’s public opinion on buying a house in the United States has completely fermented; second, Sima Nan reported Lenovo with his real name and topped the video.
. To be honest, as the younger generation, I don’t really want to get involved. It should be emphasized that I neither oppose Sima Nan’s questioning Lenovo nor other netizens’ questioning Sima Nan’s buying a house in the United States. What I object is that other netizens question Sima Nan in an extreme way without tangible evidence. This is exaggerating.
In other words, saying a few words of justice for Sima Nan does not mean that I must support Sima Nan. I really support the relative freedom of speech and the blooming of cultural thought. The more critical issue of
is that even if Sima Nan is banned, the economic difficulties still exist objectively. This is probably related to the epidemic and requires efforts from many parties.
In addition, to be honest, Sima Nan's works on economics account for a very small proportion in the past few months. On the contrary, there are more topics about the conflict between Russia and Ukraine and the epidemic. Of course, we still talk about association.
Therefore, it is believed that Sima Nan affects the development confidence of the business community, either nonsense or the deeply rooted thinking and understanding that has been formed: that is, Lenovo represents all private enterprises, and Sima Nan questioned Lenovo, which is questioning the entire business community.
But this is obviously a practice of making trouble, forcibly binding or hitting the car. Very inferior and common method. Reflects the generalization and illogical thinking.
Lenovo cannot represent all private enterprises. Private enterprises are divided into different industries and sizes, and their respective development directions and interests are also different. Not all companies can have Lenovo's background and opportunities. More importantly, in 2009, clear regulations on the restructuring of by state-owned enterprises were already established. Therefore, we can conclude as follows: First, it is extremely rare to have similar backgrounds and restructuring experiences with Lenovo; second, rather than saying that private enterprises are worried that Sima Nan will trigger public opinion to target the business community, it is better to say that private enterprises are more concerned about the level of local business environment. Because this is obviously more about the development of the company.
has to spend hundreds of words to explain this point, so as to better view Sima Nan’s reported.
How do you view Sima Nan’s report?
is not the parties involved, and there is no specific content or relevant evidence of the report. Not to express your opinion for the time being.
But as for a certain professor's reason for reporting, I personally think this is a very false thing. There is suspicion of false or labeling. It seems even more exaggerated.
Why do you say so? There are three main reasons here, and it must be mentioned:
1. Does the public have the ability to distinguish right from wrong? Answer: Obviously there is.The illiteracy rate today is already extremely low, and it is no longer simply confusing the general concerns of the people with amplifying social sentiment.
2. Are there any measures by various platforms to prohibit criticizing Sima Nan? A: Obviously not. There is no need to find more evidence. The best proof is that a short article with a low-level standard can be displayed tens of millions and read more than eight million.
3. What we have always advocated is that all flowers bloom. Even the world-class writer Mo Yan who won the Nobel Prize for , has a lot of controversy, and even criticism. As long as there is something in the words and there is no violation of the law or regulations, it should be allowed. This is how the Internet voice is, some support and some oppose it, which is normal. What is really abnormal are those practices that are out of the scope of the matter, labeling, labeling, and even more extreme.
Finally, I would like to remind you: Sima Nan, as a well-known commentator in society and a senior media person recognized by multiple platforms, is qualified and qualified to speak out on social issues.
Of course, professors from a certain university are also free to report with real names. But everything has to be told about evidence. As a place for teaching and educating people, schools should emphasize the importance of evidence and understand the importance of rigorous logic and thoughtful thinking.
At present, there is no real relevant evidence, no statement or evaluation.
But I would like to emphasize that you can use tangible evidence to report that he is indeed suspected of guiding fans, spending money to ask fans to support him, and even guiding public opinion in the comment area by deleting comments and controlling comments; you can also pick out relevant evidence of the actual problem from his large number of works to show that he does have a big problem.
However, if there is no way to provide tangible evidence. Instead, is just out of disagreeing with his point of view. May I ask, is this a malicious report?
Personally believe that this behavior is very undesirable. Especially at the level of professors in colleges and universities. It not only shows that you have a tendency to radicalize your thinking, but also shows that you do not value facts and logic.
Different views can be communicated or discussed. Even if there are huge differences in our understanding, we should learn to respect as long as others are legal. At least, we cannot attack and slander it in extreme ways. This kind of ideological sign is dangerous, and the mentality is not very peaceful, so there is no need to tear the public opinion field so much.
In short, a professor in a certain university reported Sima Nan. I hope he is not in falsehood. I hope he will not go to extremes if there is no tangible evidence. You can also learn from Sima Nan to publish his works on the online platform and express his opinions. What's more, a dignified professor should be confident that his true level is much better than Sima Nan, and there is no question of fear of debate but Sima Nan.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-