transaction veto power is essentially trust in players, this trust includes ability and loyalty, and both must be strong enough. We know that the relationship between players and teams is labor and management. Player transactions and signing are part of this business. In theory, any player can be traded, as long as he has transaction value. But the difference in the NBA is that he has some kind of human touch to some extent, which makes the NBA team not so cold-blooded.
Kobe is to the Los Angeles Lakers, Nowitzki is to the Dallas Mavericks, Duncan to the San Antonio Spurs, one person, one city, fame and fame, players, teams, and cities are integrated. Only this kind of player who can represent a team and a city can get the right to veto the deal. This is the preciousness of this right.
James also won the trade veto after leading the Cavaliers to the championship in 2016. This is Gilbert's thanks to James. The finals were 1-3 behind to complete the comeback, bringing Cleveland the first championship trophy, creating a new history. After winning the championship, James renewed the contract with the Cavaliers, and the trading veto has shown the Cavaliers' attitude towards James: I welcome you if you leave, and I wish you if you leave.
But when James joined the Lakers in the summer of 2018, he did not have this right. James won the Los Angeles Lakers with a maximum salary of $154 million for four years. But unlike Kobe’s meaning to this team, James did not get it. With enough trust, he didn't have strong results to show the Lakers his sincerity. Kobe is the faith and totem of Los Angeles, and James is the top-paid player. This is the biggest difference between the two in the Lakers so far.
Curry entered the league in 2009 and he is the longest player in the home team of all active players. From rookie to helping the Warriors win three championship trophies, Curry proved his ability and loyalty in the process. In the hearts of fans, he can already represent the Golden State Warriors, and Curry himself thinks so. Therefore, when the two sides discussed Curry's next contract, Curry wanted to add trade veto and player options, but the Warriors refused. Other super giant contracts are N+1, and Curry is a real 5-year contract.
Anthony also had trading veto power in the Knicks. He finally left the Knicks because he wanted to leave New York. The Knicks wanted to trade him a long time ago, but Anthony has the trading veto power, which has become the opposite of the trading veto power. Case: The big stars may change their dishes one day, and they can't be traded yet, so they can only get through slowly, which is extremely detrimental to the team.
Looking at all the active players in the NBA, players who are as strong as James and loyal like Curry do not have the right to trade vetoes, let alone others. Is it possible for Big Eyebrow to get this right in the Lakers? The probability is basically zero, and the glass attribute of the thick eyebrows is the biggest concern of the Lakers. Among the current players, the person most likely to have this right is Antetokounmpo. He is currently playing and has no potential injuries. Now the Bucks can accept any conditions for renewing Antetokounmpo, and the trading veto is no exception. .
Which current player do you think is most likely to get the right to veto the deal?
