On October 1 local time, the Russian Ministry of Defense said that due to the threat of being surrounded, the army evacuated the Chongliman settlements and retreated to more favorable areas. The Russian army exposed the reason for the defeat in the important city of Liman in east

On October 1, local time, Russian Ministry of Defense said that due to the threat of being surrounded, the army evacuated the Chongliman settlements and retreated to more favorable areas. Ukrainian President Zelensky personally announced the news of the liberation of Comorman. Gurulev, former commander of the Russian 58th Army, said on the 2nd that he did not agree with the leader of Chechnya accusing the commander of the Russian Central Military Region, Rabin, of taking responsibility for the loss in Liman.

Russian army exposed the reason for the failure of Liman in the important city of eastern Ukraine: the reserve mainly focuses on defense, and the troops fight for their own battles

Lost around the red Liman, Russian domestic public opinion high-profile Chechen head Kadrov accused the commander of the Russian Central Military Region General Rabin of incompetent command, and brought it to the forefront of Russian public opinion.

Kadrov said that only Lugansk and Donetsk militia troops were deployed on all fronts in the direction of Liman. These men were reserves, but Admiral Rabin did not provide them with the necessary communication, artillery support interaction and ammunition logistics support supply. Kadrov emphasized that General Rabin's command is 150 kilometers away from the front line. Kadyrov said that if he had the possibility, he would have to lower the rank of General Rabin to the private, and then drag him to the front line to carry out his bloody shame. But many Russian generals disagree with this view.

, former commander of the 58th Army of the Southern Russian Military Region, Major General Andrei Gurulev, said that Liman is an important milestone, not only military but also political, especially when the 4 places in Donbass are referendums to Russia today. It is difficult for military experts to evaluate the military significance of the city's "surrender" from a military perspective.

Gurulev added that the problem is not that the Russian Central Military Region commander's incorrect assessment of the situation, the problem is that The Russian army's impetuousness in the second phase of military operations, lies reported one after another, only said good but not bad, this system exists from top to bottom.

He pointed out that the core of Liman's defense is a unit of the Russian 20th Army and the 144th Division. This is a regular army. They have channels for the command system. Therefore, it is completely impossible to understand why they have not correctly evaluated the situation of the enemy and us on the front line, have not strengthened the establishment of in-depth defense and retained enough mobile forces, and no one correctly reported the alternative opinions put forward by the militia upward.

The general believed that Rabin could not command the troops that should be assigned to command at all. The complexity between these front-line formation types and militia branches did not have unified training and tactical coherence, and the critical moment of radio crashes, and even telephone lines could not be called.

The general believes that Liman has been holding on for more than three weeks. The Kiev regime is looking forward to concentrating its superiority on the Russian army at least five times its strength, conducting a raid on Lugansk and Donetsk, and occupying Volnovaha, cutting off the north and south western fronts and reoccupying Mariupol , but these hopes are blocked in the red, winning time for the Russian coalition's second-line corps. Therefore, the withdrawal of the Russian coalition is a strategic correct decision. This maneuver provides an opportunity to recover and rest, and in the long run, it will accumulate strong momentum to counterattack.

Russian Ministry of Defense stated that the Russian military's reorganized position was only a few kilometers away from the city of Liman. On that day, the Russian air-ground artillery fire attacked the Red Liman Ukrainian positions.

Phoenix Observation: What does it mean for Russia to lose Liman?

Ukrainian President Zelensky announced on the 2nd that the Ukrainian army had completely recovered Liman, an important eastern city. For Russia, what does it mean to lose Leman? The following content is excerpted from the comments and analysis of current affairs commentator He Liangliang -

loses Liman. For Russia, I think it is a very serious problem.

First of all, from a political perspective, the four regions in eastern Ukraine were merged into Russia after referendums, which has become a foregone conclusion, and the legal procedures are gradually unfolding. The problem is that when the referendum was held in four regions, Ukraine had already surrounded Liman under the command of , NATO, . Didn't Russia notice it? On the one hand, Russia launched a referendum in four regions of Ukraine, but on the other hand, it ignored the protection of a strategic city like Liman.

Then the next question is that Liman belongs to Donetsk Oblast . According to Russia's current statement, the Donbass region and the other two states of Donetsk Oblast are already Russian territory, but in this case, the Ukrainian army supported by NATO occupied Liman again. Although they do not recognize the outcome of Russia's referendum, whether it is NATO or Ukraine, the problem is that Russia must be able to protect these areas.

If this region has been declared as a territory of Russia, but Russia does not have enough ability to protect these areas, and although Liman is a small town, it has great military significance. So from a political point of view, this is a very unfavorable thing.

Second, from a military perspective, the Russian-Ukrainian war has been fought for more than 200 days, and some disadvantages of the Russian army have gradually emerged . Moreover, those who have some understanding of the military history of the Soviet Union and Russia will pay attention to the experience of the civil war that Russia was proud of in the past or the experience of the Patriotic War, which may not be useful now. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, Although Russia has also undergone military reform, the effectiveness of the military reform is not obvious enough to judge this Russian-Ukrainian war.

Therefore, Liman's loss can reflect that Russia currently has certain political and military problems. Of course, I think what is more interesting is the United States' reaction to Russia's possible use of nuclear weapon , and even threatened that if it occurs, The United States will launch a beheading operation on Kremlin . If this trend continues, the situation will worsen.

Source: Phoenix TV Information Station

Edited by: Mumu