On September 18, 2022, US President Biden was interviewed by the "60 Minutes" program of the US CBS TV station. When host Scott Pelley asked, "If Taiwan is attacked, will the US military defend Taiwan?" Biden said, "Yes, if there is an unprecedented attack in fact." Pelley answered because he was afraid that Biden would not hear the question clearly, so he asked again whether this meant that American soldiers would defend Taiwan under the circumstances of Chinese invasion. Biden's reply was an unmistakable "Yes!"
I thought about Biden's "Yes" for three days, and finally came up with some ideas, as if I suddenly understood what the US global strategy is.
Trump intends to unite with Russia and anti-China, but because the Democratic Party’s restraint has not been achieved. As soon as Biden came to power, he decided to abandon Trump's route and took action against the two major powers of China and Russia. On the one hand, he provoked the Russian-Ukrainian conflict in Europe, and on the other hand, pressing against China step by step in the Taiwan Strait.
, not only did I not figure it out, but many strategic experts also didn’t figure it out. Not only did some Chinese military experts not understand, some American military experts also criticized Biden's foreign strategy, thinking that he should either unite with China to resist Russia or Russia to resist China. People say that one punch can't beat four hands, why does Biden fight on two fronts? Isn’t it nice to unite one to kill one, and then kill another one?
As the saying goes, abnormality will lead to demons. Biden's boxing style is unreasonable! Among them is the Biden administration's witchcraft. So, from Biden's perspective, I thought about it carefully for his Democratic government. I have thought about these three questions: first, what is Biden’s global strategic goal? Second, what are the main factors that affect the United States' achieves its global strategic goals? Third, what are the methods and ways to achieve the United States’ global strategic goals?
It is not difficult for us to answer the first question. The United States’ global strategic goal is to consolidate the United States’ global hegemony. The question is, has the United States become the global hegemony after the Soviet Union fell? No one can challenge it! Is there a saying of "consolidation"? have! This is the second problem. The US government believes that China is challenging it. China has repeatedly stated that we do not engage in hegemony and only wants the Chinese people to live a good life. However, if the Chinese people want to live a good life, they need to seek the establishment of new international rules to ensure that China's development has a peaceful external environment. The Chinese take "peace and development" for granted, which is in line with the interests of the Chinese people and the people of the world, including the American people.
However, the US government believes that the international rules advocated by the Chinese government that are conducive to the peaceful development of all countries are bound to conflict with the international rules pursued by the US government that guarantees the barrier-free exercise of US hegemony. If the world recognizes China's international rules, the US' international rules must be abolished. Therefore, as a "experienced person" who has achieved hegemony, the United States will never believe that China will not engage in hegemony when it is strong. Even if China does not engage in American-style hegemony, the international rules advocated by China will inevitably eliminate the international rules pursued by the United States and eliminate the international rules pursued by the United States, which is equivalent to eliminating the hegemony of the United States and infringing on the core interests of the United States. Instead of being passively beaten in the future, it is better to kill China's vigorous ambitions while China has not yet become stronger than the United States. The US government believes that maintaining the US's global hegemony is to safeguard the US's core interests. This is a life-and-death struggle. The US cannot afford to lose and must win. This involves the third question: How to win?
just talk about this "how to win". There are many ways to win in the United States, but the Democratic government of the United States has chosen one that can maximize American interests, that is offshore balance.
At the beginning, as an offshore island in the European continent, the United Kingdom played this offshore balance, which made the European continent soar. As a former colony of the British Empire, the United States has deeply grasped the essence of offshore balance. The United States is playing this trick today is several levels higher than its sect leader, Britain, and it is not an exaggeration to say that it is the 5.0 version.
Let’s take a look at this globe. The east and west of the American continent are two oceans. Compared with the “European and Asia” continents that are connected into one, isn’t North America an outlying island? Why " World War II " can achieve the hegemony of the United States is because the war mainly occurred in the Eurasian continent, and the United States has become a safe island for talents and capital. In comparison, the Soviet Union did not have the geographical advantage of the United States. It could also rapidly rise to become a superpower that was on par with the United States after World War II, which has shown some advantage of the socialist system . It just rose too fast and lacked the necessary historical accumulation. In addition, the Soviet leader did not control it and embarked on the road of hegemony. As a result, hegemony failed to succeed and committed suicide instead. Relatively speaking, the United States has Britain as a role model and is blessed by superior geographical conditions. With the opportunity of the two world wars, the United States has successfully taken military hegemony and technological hegemony as its two legs, financial hegemony and rule hegemony as its two wings, public opinion hegemony and cultural hegemony as its eyes and ears, and political hegemony ( ideology or values that accompany the system) as its mind, and has swept a group of accomplices to build a complete global hegemony system.
The United States relies on such a hegemony system to do only two things to the world: plunder and enslavement. Why can Americans account for 4% of the world's population but own 30% of the world's wealth? It is the plunder and enslavement of the world by its global hegemony system. If the United States does not have this global hegemony system one day, the United States today will no longer exist. The US government knows this much more deeply than the Chinese, so any country that the US government thinks may threaten the US global hegemony must be eliminated soon! Today, the US government believes that China is the first country to threaten US hegemony, so the Biden administration is determined to fight to the end with China as soon as it comes to power. No matter how China evades, it is impossible for it to avoid the US offensive.
Does this mean that there must be a battle between China and the United States? This requires understanding the core essence of offshore balance. What is the core essence of offshore balance? For example, this time the United States wants to strangle Russia, and the United States does not pursue direct conflict with Russia. The Biden administration repeatedly emphasized that the United States will not send troops to Ukraine , and other countries do not take action directly, but choose a non-NATO country Ukraine as a proxy. Wars in Europe were flying, smoke from gunpowder was everywhere, and the United States was hustling across the river, cheering for guns, making a fortune in the war. European talents and capital were unsafe and fled to the United States one after another. In the future, the United States will use this trick to strangle China. In Asia, the DPP authorities in Taiwan are the first choice for the United States, and Japan and South Korea are the spare tires for the agents. The existence of Taiwan independence forces gave the United States a fuse to ignite the war in Asia. In other words, the United States must maintain an "offshore state" and not end in person, so that the United States can maximize its own interests -
first, There is no war in the United States, that is a place of peace and security, and a safe island for capital. With the US dollar's "international currency" status, the United States' efficiency in reaping world wealth through war will double.
Second, not only will capital surge in the United States, but scientific and technological talents from all over the world will also flood into the United States again. The harvest of talents is more significant than the harvest of capital.
Third, The United States will operate weapons manufacturing machines at full capacity and use the existing mature weapon technology to produce a large number of weapons input to the battlefield. The United States arms dealers and the U.S. government can continue to make a fortune in the war.
For the United States, there is almost zero cost and zero loss, so of course it will not let go of this business. This is the secret of the United States' rise in the two world wars and the fundamental reason why the United States provoked the conflict between Russia and Ukraine. Look at Europe, not only is it suffering from the energy crisis, but it is also worried every day whether the war will expand to its own territory. Do you think European capital will escape? Where is the most reliable? USA! Some capital was originally optimistic about China, and the United States continued to escalate the Taiwan Strait crisis, scaring the capital that could have fled to China back to the United States. Some people say that the United States has been sanctioned and caused inflation? In fact, these people are saying the opposite.The real logic is -
first, The more intense the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, the more fear Europe is, the more capital flees to the United States, which has become an important means for the Biden administration to alleviate domestic inflation and avoid economic recession.
Second, The inflation and recession trend in the United States is actually the multiple effects of the US epidemic, domestic policy imbalances, and the US government's excessive play to the harvesting role of the US dollar. However, Biden has successfully diverted domestic conflicts by using the Russian-Ukrainian conflict. The recent decline in US oil prices, ease of inflation, and rising Biden's support rate are all the results of the Biden administration's use of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict to manipulate the game between Russia and the United States.
Third, The United States not only encircled Russia but also weakened Europe and gained experience in dealing with China. It can be said that it kills three birds with one stone. The Biden administration is having a coke! It's not the storm that some media exaggerate. On the contrary, the US government firmly controls the rhythm of the game between the United States and Russia.
Recently, Putin is preparing to escalate the conflict between Russia and Ukraine. It is reflected in three aspects:
first, issuing a war mobilization order;
second, announcing the recruitment of 300,000 soldiers;
third, four regions occupied by Russia held a referendum to Russia.
Some people say Putin is going to use his big move, of course. However, this is exactly what the United States wants. The United States has been leading Russia's nose. In the past, Putin used the idea of joining NATO and integrating into the US system to take advantage of the situation and infiltrate Russian society in an all-round way, in an attempt to further cause civil unrest in Russia and continue to decompose Russia. Of course, the United States will not allow Russia to integrate into the European system. If Russia really enters Europe, there will be nothing to do with the United States. Russia will use its nearby geographical advantages, military advantages and energy advantages to really accelerate and become another powerful force that "threatens" the United States. What’s more important is how to play offshore balance on the European continent? The key to playing offshore balance is to create opposition! Let the other party be in a state of tension and always have to fight!
is the conflict between Russia and Ukraine today, and the United States has been working hard for a day or two. Why doesn't the United States allow Ukraine to join NATO? There are many excuses that can be made up. The most important consideration is that Russia and Ukraine will fight, the United States and NATO will not enter for the time being, and the core essence of offshore balance is here. Why does the Taiwan Policy Act adopted by the US Senate Foreign Affairs Committee emphasize the treatment of Taiwan as "non-NATO allies"? It is both an allies and not in the NATO system. In other words, Taiwan is not suitable for using NATO rules - a country in NATO has something to do is equal to NATO. The United States does not have to send troops to "guard" the Taiwan independence authorities, so why is Biden Yes? After looking at his speech at UN General Assembly , he claimed that he did not seek a Cold War with China , nor did he seek a conflict with China.
If that's the case, what does Yes mean? Let's look back at the game between Russia and the United States. The United States used Ukraine to press Russia step by step. When Putin won Crimea in 2014, some people in the United States criticized the Obama administration at that time for not stopping it. In fact, the United States also mobilized allies to sanction Russia, but it was just the right way to control it - it not only opposed the external attitude and "indulged" Russia continues to threaten Ukraine. The two thunders of Donetsk and Lugansk in eastern Ukraine have not yet exploded! What the United States wants is Putin's troops set foot on Ukraine, otherwise the play would not be able to continue. Over the past two hundred days, the United States has used the international public opinion it has mastered to portin to become a devil who loves aggression, making no one dare to demand a ceasefire. On the other hand, he has vigorously armed Ukraine to stop the ceasefire, which has made Putin think that he could end the Russian-Ukrainian conflict in lightning, but was forced into a protracted war by Biden.
Now, Russia is finally forcing its war to escalate the Russian-Ukraine war. The United States also used United Nations in New York to deprive Russia of its right to speak. Instead, it made an exception to let Zelensky speak in video form, further creating a situation of everyone shouting at Putin at the United Nations and further compressing Russia's international public opinion space. This made Russia have no place to sue, and there was no place to seek justice. This time, the United States has more reason to escalate its suppression of Russia. Britain, France and Germany scrambled to express their views that the United States has the conditions to launch a new round of encirclement and suppression of Russia.Continue to drive Russia crazy. When Russia becomes the target of public criticism and Putin betrays his relatives, the United States seizes the opportunity and then gives Russia a final fatal blow. It’s not that the United States does not want to end in person, it’s that the opportunity is not available, and the United States must ensure that it has zero losses. After understanding this, you will understand why Biden has been constantly switching between Yes and No on the issue of whether to send troops to "guard" Taiwan.
Why did the Democratic Party government dare to attack the two major powers of China and Russia at the same time? Why start with Russia first? It’s not that the United States chose Russia first, but that Russia was unable to hold back and was essentially fooled! If China is even more impatient than Russia, the current situation in which Russia is located may be replaced by China.
Last time, Russia successfully took back Crimea through a referendum. The United States saw that China has not yet recognized this result and has found China's trump card, that is, if Russia further takes action in eastern Ukraine, China will not express its support. The United States also fantasized about forcing China to condemn Russia and joining the U.S. camp to encircle and suppress Russia. So, if China really takes the lead as the US government wishes, will the US let China go? The answer is: No! As long as China has a slight intention to condemn Russia, the United States will continue to put forward new demands, and even use China's actions against Russia as bargaining chips to ask China for price. Biden has calculated that if China stands on the side of the United States, Russia will not last long, and it will be easy for Russia to deal with China if it falls. China's weakness is the Taiwan issue. It is always there. The United States can use it to control China at any time, and even forcing China to use force is just a matter of thought. China is passive on this issue. There is no way, the logic of history is like this.
The United States provoked a conflict between Russia and Ukraine, and its final purpose was to deal with China. How many people in China understand this principle? have no idea. If Russia falls this time, China will be surrounded by Western forces led by the United States in an instant. How many people know this truth? have no idea. This is the most central part of the US global strategy. If China is strangled under such conditions, the United States in this world will really become "Dugu Qiubai", and no country dares to challenge the United States.
To sum up, the logic of the United States and China fighting to the death should be clear. The United States regards hegemony as its core interest. The US government believes that China threatens the core interests of the United States and that the United States must strangle China. It's that simple. Therefore, it is meaningless for Chinese experts to repeatedly guess whether the United States will send troops to "assist in defense" Taiwan. The correct judgment is: when the United States uses its agent to consume China, the United States will not send troops to Taiwan. Only when the United States evaluates that China has been consumed almost all, the United States has absolutely certainty of winning and can achieve zero losses, will the United States send itself to fight to kill China in one go.
This analysis lets us understand, may China escape the containment, suppression and encirclement of the United States? Can't escape. Even if China agrees to all the requests of the United States, the United States will not spare China. It will continue to make new requests until China cannot agree. Just as Putin wants to integrate into the US-European system, it becomes the US's bargaining chip to seize Russia, the US will never spare Russia. The war between Russia and Ukraine has escalated, and Putin’s approach can only be called a Jedi counterattack and a life-and-death struggle! Russia has been forced into a corner and has no chance to surrender to the United States as a prisoner!
Then why do I say Putin can’t hold back? In fact, Putin is not without room for maneuver, he is indeed impatient. If Putin only chooses to be in a big army this time, he will incite Donetsk to and Lugansk to make independence first and then hold a referendum, that is, to constantly copy the Crimean model story. As long as the Russian army does not step into Ukrainian land, the United States will have no excuse to call the whole world to encircle Russia. Waiting for Zelensky to stop being calm, Russia will not be morally disadvantaged. When Zelensky was forced into a corner by domestic public opinion, he would inevitably make a desperate bet, and Russia had an excuse to send troops. But it's too late to say anything now. Russia's only way is to fight to the end. There may be hope for survival in death.Putin's speech this time was told to the Russian people. I think he should have a speech for the whole world. He cannot go to New York to attend the UN General Assembly. Russia has a representative to the UN General Assembly who can speak for Putin and raise the flag of anti-dominance, so as to seize a moral commanding height for Russia's military operations. Putin lost in the situation, and many people don’t understand this, thinking that the fighting nation can do everything with nuclear weapons.
Speaking of nuclear weapons, it also reveals that the United States has premeditated Russia. Not long before the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, the five permanent members issued a joint statement saying that the nuclear war, cannot be fought or won. This matter was initiated by the United States, and China can only agree with it because it is in line with morality and in China's interests, but the American motive is to tie Russia's hands and feet. If it is only compared to conventional weapons, Russia and the United States have a big gap, and as long as Russia does not use nuclear weapons, it will not have an advantage. If Russia threatens to act on its core, it will lose morally - to repent.
Isn’t this how things develop in the Russian-Ukrainian conflict? In terms of the game between the United States and Russia, Russia has an advantage in the Ukrainian battlefield, but in terms of the entire game between Russia and the United States, the United States has an absolute advantage, and the United States' overall advantage is eliminating Russia's local advantage. Putin issued a war mobilization order, which is precisely evidence that this local advantage disappeared. So, will the result of the game between Russia and the United States definitely be as expected by the United States? That's not. After all, Russia is a vast country with a vast territory and vast territory, and has nuclear weapons as its trump card. There are still conditions for a long-term confrontation with the United States. The key is not to cause trouble within the Xiao Wall.
Some analysts predict that the United States may ignite many wars around China. The Korean Peninsula is one, the Taiwan Strait is one, and South China Sea Countries like Philippines may also be in the way of the United States. There is also a question whether India can withstand the instigation and provocation of the United States. Japan is the biggest opportunist . Although Taiwan's fuse is the easiest to ignite, it does not necessarily have to start with Taiwan. As long as the goal of messing up Asia can be achieved, the United States will win firmly. I agree with this analysis.
has said so much, what is the essence of offshore balance? That is to always ensure peace on American land. In this way, the most effective way to break the deadlock is to lead the war to the United States. Who thought of this idea? If it's not someone else, that's Kim Jong-un, a post-80s generation. North Korea is already a nuclear-capable country, and its claim to launch the missile rocket has the ability to hit the US mainland. It is no joke that North Korea issued regulations on the use of nuclear weapons at this time. Kim Jong-un decided that as long as the United States and South Korea jointly threaten North Korea to the point where it can't bear it, North Korea will use nuclear bombs to attack the US mainland. Did Putin think of it? Of course I thought of it, but that was the last killer move after all, and Putin would not do this unless he had no choice.
Will China do this? Won't. First of all, China is a staunch pacifist and the only country that declares not to use nuclear weapons first and does not threaten the use of nuclear weapons against non-nuclear countries. China's image of adhering to principles and keeping one's word cannot be destroyed. Secondly, the quantity and quality of China's conventional weapons are not weaker than that of the United States, and the United States knows that it cannot threaten China. In response to the US's global strategy, China's idea of breaking the deadlock is to keep the US's plan to provoke war in eastern Asia forever on the plan. The only way China can't make the United States' offshore balance is that Asia itself will not burn the war. Therefore, as long as China cannot be as restless as Putin, it will not be fooled.
Someone is going to ask, if the United States encourages the Taiwan authorities to be independent, China will calm down and remain motionless? Of course not. If China wants to break the situation of offshore balance in the United States, it must do three things at the same time -
first, and divide the US camp. , both inside and outside, the US camp is not a monolithic part. There are many people in the United States who believe that China-US relations are in line with the interests of the United States, and most American companies are not willing to lose China's huge market. If we observe Ambassador Qin Gang's work in the United States, we will know that his continuous participation in some activities in the American industry, business, science and culture in the United States should have certain effects.In recent days, Foreign Minister Wang Yi, who participated in the UN General Assembly , has also intensively met with China-friendly people including Dr. Kissinger in New York, USA, and is also doing this work. This is true in the United States, and the US ally system is not a solid piece of law. They all have their own national interests, which is the entry point for doing their work.
For example, France, Macron shows a stronger sense of independence and autonomy, and he is willing to consider China-France relations based on France's own interests. Even if its government is clamoring to decouple from China, German companies have increased their investment in China, so that Germany's investment in China has increased instead of falling. South Korea has its own considerations about the so-called "chip four-party alliance" established by the United States. Even Japan is selling in large quantities of . The question now is that under the kidnapped by the US military-industrial complex, the US government has reached an extreme background in its attitude towards China. How can we do our work to make groups that are less hostile to China and value common interests a force that restricts the US government from crazy anti-China? This is our focus. In short, no matter what the effect is, the differentiation work is meaningful and we must persist in doing it.
Second, we must strengthen the power of peace. The core of offshore balance is to provoke war. What can prevent the United States from provoking war is the force of peace. In recent years, China has made frequent diplomatic moves, including the recent BRICS summit and the SCO summit, both of which are doing the work of "strengthening the power of peace". Some experts interpret that it is actually a misunderstanding that a group confrontation with the Western group led by the United States. The charters of these two organizations have one common content, that is, they are not targeted by third parties, nor by any country or organization. This is not to be a part of the game, it is the truth. The power of unity and peace is to oppose war and some things related to war, which makes the cost of provoking wars in the United States huge, so offshore balance cannot be achieved.
For example, the United States provoked a dispute over the Diaoyu Islands and wanted China and Japan to fight, but China and Japan were in a fierce battle, just not fighting. In the Huangyan Island incident, in , the United States hopes that the Philippines and China will directly use force, but they have returned in disgrace after teasing many times. China and the Philippines are also in a fierce fight, just not fighting. Including North Korea and South Korea, the United States has to hold several military exercises every year to stimulate their fight. These two families yell at each other but don’t fight. Why? They don’t want to fight, they all know the intentions of the United States. Regarding this point, China must talk to the outside world through diplomatic channels and public opinion channels so that all Asian countries can understand the principle that the United States should engage in offshore balance. We are all victims, and the United States is the only beneficiary. The most fundamental thing to strengthen peace is to strengthen China's own strength, and the key to strengthening China's own strength lies in unity!
The problems currently facing China are on the surface, but on the surface, but on the inside. The US forces cannot contain China from the outside, and it is the US's strength to do things within China. China must solve how to unite the people to the greatest extent, move forward for a common goal, and strive to develop and strengthen itself. When China becomes stronger, the power of world peace becomes stronger. At the same time, China must strengthen its image of peace and friendship internationally. Friendship inside and outside must be high-profile, and is friendship under the premise of mutual respect, peaceful coexistence and win-win cooperation. Some people don’t understand, and they blame them when they see that they are friendly to China and the United States and China-Japan. This is not understanding that “peace and friendship” is also a weapon of diplomatic struggle. The United States is well aware of this. Interference in the internal affairs of other countries and provoking wars are all under the banner of maintaining peace. But the United States is fake, and China is real. As long as we persevere and work hard to create and publicize, the people of the world will eventually realize it.
Third, be prepared for military struggle. may say, isn’t this contradictory? You said peace is coming. This is called not understanding the dialectics of peace and war. Many times peace is fought. China uses anti-imperialist, anti-colonial, and anti-feudal wars to create a peaceful new China. There will be no peace by compromise and gifts from others. The more fully prepared China for military struggle, the more secure the peace is.What preparations should be made? First, be prepared to engage in a large-scale war with international anti-China forces represented by the United States anti-China forces.
What should China do if the United States forcibly ignites the Korean War? What should China do if the United States forcibly ignites the war in the Taiwan Strait? We must think clearly and have specific combat strategies and practical training. Even if the war breaks out tomorrow, China will not be surprised or panic. It will not only calmly respond to the battle, but also take the initiative in the war. Secondly, be prepared to resolve the Taiwan issue by force. The United States recently launched a "Taiwan Policy Act". If this bill becomes law, the Taiwan authorities will lose the initiative immediately. The United States will directly interfere in Taiwan's military deployment and command. Taiwan has actually become a part of the United States. Regarding this, China must realize the space that can be used in the middle.
Qin Gang said that if the US government approves this bill, it means that Sino-US relations will collapse. What is disintegration? Because this means that the US government has actually invaded our Taiwan territory and can watch the US declare war on China. China can handle Sino-US relations in a state of war. China-US diplomatic relations may be demoted, and China may announce that any actions such as selling weapons to Taiwan and dispatching advisers are invasions against China, and China reserves the right to counterattack at any time. China has the right to destroy any means of transport that the United States has transported weapons to Taiwan. This principle must be discussed in the United Nations and in various international organizations. To make the whole world understand that the United States has invaded China, China must fight against aggression. The US's behavior is hegemony, and China must counter hegemony. If the US government realizes that it cannot gain advantage in doing so, it stops and China will follow the flow.
If the United States insists on its own way, China will never take a step back. Preparing for war is also an important way to gather internal forces. Has the United States successfully transferred domestic conflicts by exaggerating China's threat? The threat of China is false, and the threat of the United States is real. Why not explain the situation to the people clearly? Therefore, if Biden insists on signing the Taiwan Policy Act, China will have sufficient reasons to mobilize war and prepare for military struggle, and also have a means to further differentiate Taiwan independence forces. China can also formulate and issue the National Unification Law to bring unified actions into the track of legalization. Of course, in this process, all peace-loving and opposing hegemony forces in the united state are particularly important, and China cannot fight alone. In this sense, China-Russia back-to-back support is effective. At least if Russia does not take advantage of China to rob, China's north will be worry-free. China is currently working hard in Southeast Asia, Central Asia and the Middle East to vigorously cultivate the power of peace, which is to prepare for one day to counterattack external forces against China.
If these three things are done well, the United States’ offshore balance technique against China will fail. Only when the US government feels that there is no hope, will it sit down and learn to respect each other, live peacefully, cooperate and win-win cooperation, and will it realize the preciousness of these twelve Chinese characters. Only in the world can there be real peace.
If you understand the offshore balance of the US government, you will not be surprised by a sentence or expression from American politicians, including Biden. Some military analysts and some international relations scholars are accustomed to making a fuss about the words and gestures of American politicians, sometimes shouting and sometimes calling for peace, all because they have not seen through the US global strategy and its strategy toward China. I hope Biden's Yes will make them sober and focus on how to do the above three things.
China-US game, China's confidence in winning comes from within. China itself does not want to lose, and no one can defeat China!
Note: The author of this article is Mou Lin, a core member of the "Qin'an Strategic Think Tank", and is the original work of on this platform . In the new year, I wish everyone join hands, overcome the epidemic, curb hegemony, and move towards a better future together.
